
Sentencing
Doctrine in Criminal. 70 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Abdul Bai K.Amara v R (CR APP 45 of 1960) [1961] SLCA 2 (4 April 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: An appellate court has no statutory power to increase a sentence when the appellant has not appealed against sentence.
- Adrian Fisher V State (CR APP 4 of 2010) [2015] SLCA 1124 (28 July 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: A judicial officer may be charged with misappropriation of public funds under the Anti-Corruption Act for actions taken in their official capacity.
- Adupa v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 81 of 2020) [2024] UGSC 42 (21 October 2024)
Uganda · 2024
Principle established: An appellate court reviews whether a trial judge erred in sentencing for murder, particularly regarding the duration of imprisonment and the circumstances of the offence.
- Amara v S (CR APP 18 of 2013; CR APP 19 of 2013; CR APP 20 of 2013) [2013] SLCA 18 (6 December 2013)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2013
Principle established: A convict seeking to pay a court-ordered fine after the expiration of the deadline may apply for an extension of time to pay the remaining balance.
- Aryampa v Uganda (Criminal Application 4 of 2024) [2024] UGSC 33 (31 July 2024)
Uganda · 2024
Principle established: Bail pending appeal may be granted if the appeal is not frivolous, has a reasonable possibility of success, and the applicant provides substantial sureties.
- Attorney-General & Bejet Jojo (CR APP 6 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1222 (12 February 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: An appellate court should only interfere with a trial court's sentencing discretion where the trial court exercised that discretion on a wrong principle.
- Attorney-General v Bejet Jojo (CR APP 6 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1249 (12 February 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: An appellate court will disturb a trial court's sentence only if it is evident that the sentencing discretion was exercised on a wrong principle.
- Baby Alieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 26 (29 January 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Baby Alieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2019) [2018] SLCA 1281 (28 January 2018)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2018
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Baby Allieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 8 (29 January 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Bah v S (CR APP 1 of 2012) [2015] SLCA 4 (23 June 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: An application for bail pending appeal may be considered by the Court of Appeal following a conviction for receiving stolen goods, often supported by medical or legal grounds.
- Bob Maloba Ogola v Republic [2017] KEHC 2026 (KLR)
Kenya · 2017
Principle established: A sentence for burglary following a plea of guilty may be challenged on appeal if it is considered harsh or excessive under the circumstances of the offence.
- Buckle v Commissioner of Police, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 265
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: Where an offence-creating statute is repealed and re-enacted with stiffer penalties, an offence committed before the repeal must be punished under the repealed statute's original penalties.
- Buckle v. Commissioner of Police (MAG APP 23 of 1965) [1965] SLSC 4 (21 September 1965)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1965
Principle established: Where an enactment creating an offence is repealed and re-enacted with heavier penalties, offences committed prior to repeal must be punished according to the repealed enactment's lesser penalties.
- Chikiwa v State (30 of 2024) [2024] ZWSC 30 (30 January 2024)
Zimbabwe · 2024
Principle established: An appellate court may set aside a conviction and sentence for unlawful entry while upholding a conviction for murder based on the specific evidence presented for each count.
- Fudi Yankuba V The State (32 of 2003) [2006] SLCA 5 (13 July 2006)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2006
Principle established: An appellate court may quash a conviction and death sentence for murder and substitute a conviction for manslaughter with an appropriate term of imprisonment accounting for custody time.
- Gabiri v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 80 of 2018) [2024] UGSC 46 (12 December 2024)
Uganda · 2024
Principle established: An appellate court may consider whether sentences for multiple counts of attempted murder should run concurrently or consecutively to ensure the total punishment is not excessive.
- Haja A.O.E Kabba v S (CR APP 10 of 2014) [2014] SLCA 10 (30 April 2014)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2014
Principle established: Upon the quashing of a conviction, the court must order the refund of all sums paid by the accused as fines or restitution related to the quashed counts.
- Haja Afsatu Kabba v S (CR APP 10 of 2010) [2013] SLCA 14 (29 November 2013)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2013
Principle established: A public official may be convicted of misappropriation of public funds under the Anti-Corruption Act for giving verbal instructions that lead to the unauthorized disbursement of state funds.
- Haja Afsatu Olayinka Ebishola Kabba V The State (CR APP 10 of 2010) [2014] SLCA 5 (30 April 2014)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2014
Principle established: When a conviction for corruption is quashed on appeal, any monies paid as fines or refunds of the subject matter of the offences must be returned to the appellant.
- Hua v Republic (MSCA Criminal Application 21 of 2021) [2024] MWSC 5 (15 March 2024)
Malawi · 2024
Principle established: Leave to appeal out of time against a sentence for possession of listed species may be denied if the applicant fails to provide sufficient grounds for the delay.
- In Re: Contempt of Court Alleged Against Berthan Macaulay, Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Sierra Leone (CR APP 38 of 1960) [1960] SLCA 4 (3 November 1960)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1960
Principle established: A superior court judge has summary jurisdiction to convict and fine for contempt of court committed in facie curiae without following ordinary criminal procedure or hearing formal evidence.
- Kaberia (Criminal Appeal 68 of 2019) [2024] KECA 1128 (KLR) (6 September 2024) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: In cases of robbery with violence and gang rape, the court must evaluate the evidence of identification and the use of dangerous weapons to sustain a conviction.
- Kagonye v State (32 of 2024) [2024] ZWSC 32 (26 March 2024)
Zimbabwe · 2024
Principle established: A public official may be convicted of theft of trust property if they misappropriated assets entrusted to them in their official capacity.
- Kamara & 3 Others v S (CR APP 8 of 2010) [2012] SLCA 23 (29 November 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: Convictions for robbery with aggravation and wounding with intent may be appealed to the Court of Appeal to challenge the findings of the trial court.
- Kamugisha Bernard v Uganda (Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 0047 of 2019) [2019] UGCA 2025 (18 November 2019)
Uganda · 2019
Principle established: An applicant may be granted bail pending appeal if they demonstrate substantial sureties, a fixed place of abode, and have previously honored bail conditions during trial.
- Kibugi v Republic (Criminal Appeal 41 of 2018) [2024] KECA 1713 (KLR) (28 November 2024) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: A conviction for defilement of a minor results in a mandatory life sentence under the Sexual Offences Act, which may be upheld on appeal if the evidence is conclusive.
- Koroma v S (CR APP 3 of 2010) [2013] SLCA 19 (19 December 2013)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2013
Principle established: Convictions for abuse of office and failure to comply with procurement laws under the Anti-Corruption Act may result in substantial fines or concurrent terms of imprisonment.
- Kulaishi v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 187 of 2024) [2024] UGCA 181 (17 July 2024)
Uganda · 2024
Principle established: The court may impose consecutive sentences for distinct offences like rape and aggravated robbery, provided the total sentence is proportionate to the gravity of the crimes.
- MAPHOSA v THE STATE (SC 07 of 2026) [2026] ZWSC 2 (9 January 2026)
Zimbabwe · 2026
Principle established: Unlawful possession of a specially protected animal trophy attracts a mandatory minimum sentence unless the accused demonstrates special circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense.
- MB v Republic (Criminal Appeal 219 of 2019) [2024] KECA 324 (KLR) (15 March 2024) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: A sentence of life imprisonment for defilement may be challenged on the grounds of being excessive or unconstitutional, requiring the court to consider the specific circumstances and time spent in remand.
- Moses Karanja Mureithi v Republic [2022] KEHC 2026 (KLR)
Kenya · 2022
Principle established: Conviction for the defilement of a child requires proof of intentional penetration, and the court must adhere to statutory sentencing guidelines for such offences.
- MUKUTU AND ANOTHER v THE STATE (SC 05 of 2026) [2026] ZWSC 3 (6 January 2026)
Zimbabwe · 2026
Principle established: Public officers commit a criminal offense when they act inconsistently with their duties for the purpose of showing favor or disfavor to any person.
- Mutakura v S (SC 766/25) [2026] ZWSC 14 (17 February 2026)
Zimbabwe · 2026
Principle established: A conviction for fraud will be upheld where the evidence establishes that the accused made a misrepresentation with the intent to defraud, resulting in prejudice.
- Nakku Jackline v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 52 of 2024) [2026] UGSC 45 (27 August 2026)
Uganda · 2026
Principle established: A conviction for murder requires proof beyond reasonable doubt of the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought.
- Ncube v S (HCBCR 1442/26) [2026] ZWBHC 117 (28 August 2026)
Zimbabwe · 2026
Principle established: Fraud is committed when a person makes a false representation with the intent to deceive, causing another person to act to their prejudice.
- Ngeno v Republic (Criminal Appeal 24 of 2016) [2024] KECA 757 (KLR) (21 June 2024) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: The mandatory nature of the death sentence for murder is unconstitutional, and courts must exercise discretion in sentencing by considering the specific circumstances of the case.
- Opolot Ben v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 70 of 2023) [2026] UGSC 13 (11 April 2026)
Uganda · 2026
Principle established: When sentencing a convict, the court must take into account the period spent on remand to ensure the legality and fairness of the final custodial term.
- R v Khoviwa (Criminal Case 20 of 2023) [2023] MWHC 116 (20 December 2023)
Malawi · 2023
Principle established: Mandatory death sentences for murder are unconstitutional, and convicts sentenced under such provisions are entitled to a resentencing hearing where the court exercises its discretion.
- R v Matotsa (Criminal Case 11 of 2023) [2023] MWHC 121 (21 December 2023)
Malawi · 2023
Principle established: A repeat offender convicted of a serious sexual offence such as defilement may be referred to a higher court for a sentence that exceeds the jurisdictional limits of the trial court.
