
Criminal
Area of law. 545 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Abdul Bai K.Amara v R (CR APP 45 of 1960) [1961] SLCA 2 (4 April 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: An appellate court has no statutory power to increase a sentence when the appellant has not appealed against sentence.
- Adrian Fisher V State (CR APP 4 of 2010) [2015] SLCA 1124 (28 July 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: A judicial officer may be charged with misappropriation of public funds under the Anti-Corruption Act for actions taken in their official capacity.
- Adupa v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 81 of 2020) [2024] UGSC 42 (21 October 2024)
Uganda · 2024
Principle established: An appellate court reviews whether a trial judge erred in sentencing for murder, particularly regarding the duration of imprisonment and the circumstances of the offence.
- Alastair P. Mcneile v Commissioner of Police (13 of 61) [1961] SLSC 35 (14 August 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: A magistrate acts correctly in law by discharging an accused rather than acquitting and discharging him when criminal proceedings are terminated without a final determination on the merits.
- Alastair Peter McNeile v Commissioner of Police (MAG APP 13 of 1961) [1961] SLSC 7 (14 April 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: A magistrate acts correctly in point of law by ordering a discharge rather than an acquittal where the disposition does not bar the prosecution from reinstituting charges.
- Alimu Bah V The State (CR APP 52 of 2010) [2014] SLCA 1 (6 May 2014)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2014
Principle established: In criminal cases involving the handling of project funds, the prosecution must establish the specific legal obligation of the accused to deal with the property in a particular manner.
- Allie v Alhadi, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 72
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: The rule requiring criminal prosecution of a felony prior to maintaining a civil action for the same wrong does not apply where the civil defendant is an innocent third party.
- Alpha Kamara v S. A. T. Koroma (43 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 11 (30 September 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A magistrate must consider the whole of the evidence before refusing to commit an accused for trial, and any person aggrieved may appeal questions of law.
- Alpha Kamara v S.A.T Koroma (MAG APP 53 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 38 (30 September 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A magistrate cannot refuse to commit an accused for trial without considering the whole of the evidence, and any person may lay an information for a public offence absent limiting statutory provisions.
- Amadu M. Jalloh v Attorney General & Minister of Justice (MISC APP 13 of 2020) [2021] SLSC 37 (16 June 2021)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2021
Principle established: Judicial review may be sought to quash decisions or orders of a lower court where there is a jurisdictional error, procedural impropriety, or a breach of fundamental rights.
- Amara Koiju v R (17 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1235 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: A judge is not bound to put manslaughter to assessors where the evidence does not support it, and the mere withdrawal of affection does not constitute legal provocation.
- Amara Koiju v R (CR APP 17 of 1963) [2020] SLCA 13 (12 August 2020)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2020
Principle established: A trial judge is not bound to put manslaughter to assessors absent evidence legally amounting to provocation, and a partner withdrawing affection does not constitute legal provocation.
- Amara Koiju v Regina (CR APP 17 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1241 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: A judge need not direct assessors on manslaughter where there is no evidence to support it, and the withdrawal of romantic affection does not amount to provocation in law.
- Amara Koiju v Regina (CR APP 17 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 1 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A trial judge need not leave manslaughter to assessors absent evidence supporting it, and the withdrawal of affection does not constitute legal provocation.
- Amara v S (CR APP 18 of 2013; CR APP 19 of 2013; CR APP 20 of 2013) [2013] SLCA 18 (6 December 2013)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2013
Principle established: A convict seeking to pay a court-ordered fine after the expiration of the deadline may apply for an extension of time to pay the remaining balance.
- Amara v S (CR APP 4 of 2013) [2013] SLCA 12 (19 July 2013)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2013
Principle established: An applicant convicted of dishonest appropriation of donor funds under the Anti-Corruption Act may apply for bail pending the hearing and determination of their appeal.
- Aryampa v Uganda (Criminal Application 4 of 2024) [2024] UGSC 33 (31 July 2024)
Uganda · 2024
Principle established: Bail pending appeal may be granted if the appeal is not frivolous, has a reasonable possibility of success, and the applicant provides substantial sureties.
- Att.-Gen. v Holden, 1957-60 ALR S.L. 20
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1957-60
Principle established: A presiding election officer with a duty to maintain order at a polling station may use necessary force without committing assault to remove a person who refuses to behave.
- Attorney-General & Bejet Jojo (CR APP 6 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1222 (12 February 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: An appellate court should only interfere with a trial court's sentencing discretion where the trial court exercised that discretion on a wrong principle.
- Attorney-General v Abu Kabia (CR APP 16 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1215 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: General words in a later statute do not repeal or derogate from earlier specific statutory provisions without a clear indication of a particular legislative intention to do so.
- Attorney-General v Abu Kabia (CR APP 16 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1216 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: General statutory language in later legislation will not impliedly repeal or derogate from an earlier specific enactment absent a clear intention to do so.
- Attorney-General v Abu Kabia (CR APP 16 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1242 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: General words in later legislation do not impliedly repeal earlier specific statutory provisions unless an intention to alter the special law is clearly indicated.
- Attorney-General v Albert Margai (MAG APP 41 of 1959) [1960] SLSC 5 (20 October 1960)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1960
Principle established: The Summary Jurisdiction Act applies in Sierra Leone, but a prosecution cannot be dismissed as time-barred without proof on the record of when the complaint was made.
- Attorney-General v Baimba Limba (CR APP 15 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1217 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: A magistrate acquiring jurisdiction to try an indictable charge summarily under section 18 of the Summary Conviction Offences Act must show on the record consideration of circumstances and expediency.
- Attorney-General v Baimba Limba (CR APP 15 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1243 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: To acquire summary jurisdiction under section 18 of the Summary Conviction Offences Act without a preliminary inquiry, the record must reflect that the magistrate considered it expedient having regard to the circumstances.
- Attorney-General v Bejet Jojo (CR APP 6 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1249 (12 February 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: An appellate court will disturb a trial court's sentence only if it is evident that the sentencing discretion was exercised on a wrong principle.
- Attorney-General v J.C. Lucan (CR APP 5 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 4 (14 April 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: Selling a single copy of a newspaper does not constitute dispersing it under the Newspapers Ordinance, but selling one copy while possessing others for sale amounts to an attempt to disperse.
- Attorney-General v Jonathan C. Lucan (MAG APP 49 of 1960) [1961] SLSC 16 (27 January 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: Selling an isolated copy of a newspaper does not constitute dispersing or assisting in dispersing a newspaper under the Newspapers Ordinance.
- Baby Alieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 26 (29 January 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Baby Alieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2019) [2018] SLCA 1281 (28 January 2018)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2018
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Baby Allieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 8 (29 January 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Bah v S (CR APP 1 of 2012) [2012] SLCA 2 (7 February 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: A person convicted of receiving stolen goods may apply for bail pending appeal, although costs are generally not awarded in such criminal applications.
- Bah v S (CR APP 1 of 2012) [2015] SLCA 4 (23 June 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: An application for bail pending appeal may be considered by the Court of Appeal following a conviction for receiving stolen goods, often supported by medical or legal grounds.
- Bangura (M.) v R, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 214
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: The absence of a recorded summing-up is not fatal to a conviction where the evidence clearly supports a unanimous verdict and raises no difficult issues.
- Bangura (M) v. R (39 of 1964) [1965] SLCA 2 (8 March 1965)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1965
Principle established: The failure to record a judge's summing-up does not vitiate a conviction where the jury returned a unanimous verdict clearly supported by the evidence and raising no complex issues.
- Barrie & Anor v S (CR APP 8 of 1974) [1976] SLCA 2 (11 March 1976)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1976
Principle established: The wrongful admission of prejudicial evidence will lead to the quashing of a conviction unless the appellate court is certain the jury would inevitably have reached the same verdict without it.
- Barrie & ANOR v S (Criminal Appeal 8 of 1974) [1976] SLSC 8 (11 March 1976)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1976
Principle established: The wrongful admission of prejudicial evidence will lead to the quashing of a conviction unless the appellate court is certain the jury would inevitably have reached the same verdict without it.
- Basma v The State (CR APP 1 of 2012) [2012] SLSC 10 (12 December 2012)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2012
Principle established: An application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court may be scrutinized for irregularities in the record of proceedings, such as inconsistent dates on the notice of appeal.
- Basma v The State (CR APP 1 of 2012) [2014] SLSC 1 (21 January 2014)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2014
Principle established: Appellate courts must comply with mandatory procedural rules regarding the abandonment of notices of appeal before acting on such an assumption in their rulings.
- Bilderberg v R (Miscellaneous Criminal Application 3 of 2024) [2024] MWHC 69 (17 September 2024)
Malawi · 2024
Principle established: The court may grant the temporary release of a passport for international travel on condition of surrendering significant security to ensure the applicant's return.
