
Appeals and leave to appeal
Doctrine in Civil Procedure. 183 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Abdul Bai K.Amara v R (CR APP 45 of 1960) [1961] SLCA 2 (4 April 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: An appellate court has no statutory power to increase a sentence when the appellant has not appealed against sentence.
- Abdul Karim Sesay v Attorney-General & Anor (MISC APP 19 of 2015) [2016] SLCA 1182 (28 January 2016)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2016
Principle established: A party refused leave to appeal by the High Court may apply directly to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal against an interlocutory ruling.
- Abdul Rahman Jalloh v The West Africa Regional Director (CIV APP 2 of 2009) [2015] SLSC 1210 (24 November 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: The Supreme Court hears cross-appeals from the Court of Appeal to determine the correctness of orders made in employment-related disputes.
- Adjei v Anas and Another (J7/06/2026) [2026] GHASC 37 (11 February 2026)
Ghana · 2026
Principle established: A review application must disclose exceptional circumstances resulting in a miscarriage of justice and cannot be used as a mere re-argument of the original appeal.
- ADJEI VRS ANAS AND ANOR (J7/06/2026) [2026] GHASC 18 (11 February 2026)
Ghana · 2026
Principle established: A review application must disclose exceptional circumstances resulting in a miscarriage of justice and cannot be used as a mere re-argument of the original appeal.
- Administrator-General v Biakieu (CIV APP 2 of 1972) [1973] SLSC 7 (3 July 1973)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1973
Principle established: An Administrator-General appearing in an official capacity cannot be made personally liable for costs due to an irregularity in appointment, and an error of law justifies an appellate court reversing a costs order.
- Administrator-General v Biakieu (CIV APP 6 of 1972) [1972] SLCA 1287 (3 November 1972)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1972
Principle established: Leave to appeal against an order for costs may be granted where an issue of public importance arises, such as where a public officer is personally ordered to pay costs.
- Admor.-Gen. v Biakieu, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 154
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: Leave to appeal against an order for costs may be granted when a question of public importance is involved, such as where a public officer is ordered personally to pay costs.
- Admor.-Gen. v Biakieu, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 310
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: An error of law affecting costs justifies an appellate court in setting aside a costs order, and an Administrator-General acting officially cannot be made personally liable due to an appointment irregularity.
- AGIP (S.L.) Ltd v Edmask, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 218
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: A landlord's acceptance of rent with knowledge of a breach of covenant constitutes a waiver of the breach, regardless of whether waiver was intended.
- Agip (SL) Ltd v Edmask And Another (SC CIV APP 10 of 1972) [1973] SLSC 5 (24 May 1973)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1973
Principle established: A landlord's acceptance of rent with knowledge of a tenant's breach constitutes a waiver of the breach as a matter of law, regardless of the landlord's subjective intent.
- Agip v Edmask & Another (CIV APP 2 of 1971) [1973] SLSC 6 (28 February 1973)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1973
Principle established: A landlord's or authorized agent's acceptance of accrued rent with knowledge of a tenant's breach constitutes a waiver of that breach, irrespective of whether waiver was actually intended.
- Aiah Fengai & 73 Others & Marginalised Affected Property Owners v Octea Limited (CIV APP 73 of 2023) [2024] SLCA 3 (29 February 2024)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2024
Principle established: Whether a decision striking out a writ for lack of jurisdiction is interlocutory or final determines the procedure for seeking leave to appeal.
- Aiah Fengai & ORS v Octea Ltd (CivAPP 73/23) [2024] SLCA 2 (29 February 2024)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2024
Principle established: A court may grant leave to appeal against a decision striking out consolidated writs if it determines the decision was interlocutory rather than final.
- Alhaji A.B. Mansaray v Abdul M. Iscandri & ORS (SC MISC APP 6 of 1984) [1984] SLSC 3 (14 February 1984)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1984
Principle established: The Supreme Court will refuse an application for special leave to appeal where the applicant fails to demonstrate that it is a proper case for the court to exercise its discretion.
- Alhassan P. Kargbo & Another v Brima Jalloh (MISC APP 41 of 2011) [2012] SLSC 19 (5 January 2012)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2012
Principle established: A party may seek leave to amend court papers to correctly reflect their status as an appellant rather than an interested party.
- Allie v Alhadi, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 261
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: An appellate court will not disturb or set aside concurrent findings of fact made by two courts below.
- Allie v Alhadi, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 72
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: The rule requiring criminal prosecution of a felony prior to maintaining a civil action for the same wrong does not apply where the civil defendant is an innocent third party.
- Alpha Kamara v S.A.T Koroma (MAG APP 53 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 38 (30 September 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A magistrate cannot refuse to commit an accused for trial without considering the whole of the evidence, and any person may lay an information for a public offence absent limiting statutory provisions.
- Alusine Bangura & Ors v SLPP Chairman & Leader & Ors (CIV APP 17 of 2017; CIV APP 58 of 2017) [2017] SLCA 1181 (7 April 2017)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2017
Principle established: An interlocutory injunction may be granted to restrain a political party's national conference or executive meetings pending the determination of an appeal concerning internal party elections.
- Alusine Kargbo & Others v Momodu Jalloh (CIV APP 72 of 2008) [2019] SLCA 7 (8 April 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court considered whether a trial judge erred by preferring a statutory declaration over a deed of conveyance and whether the judgment was against the weight of evidence in a land dispute.
- Arthur E .Agbaje & Another v Hassiatu G. Agbaje (MISC APP 2 of 2014) [2015] SLSC 1215 (24 February 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: The Supreme Court may grant an enlargement of time to appeal and a stay of proceedings where an appeal lies as of right, pursuant to its procedural rules.
- Arthur E. Agbaje v Christian E.Agbaje And Another (MISC APP 2 of 2014) [2015] SLSC 1211 (24 February 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: An applicant may seek an enlargement of time to appeal and a stay of execution of lower court judgments pending the determination of the appeal in the Supreme Court.
- Arthur Ebun Agbaje v Christiana Ebun Agbaje (MISC APP 2 of 2014) [2015] SLSC 1204 (24 February 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: Where an appeal lies as of right, the Supreme Court has the discretion to grant an enlargement of time to lodge the appeal and stay proceedings from the lower courts.
- Arthur Massally v Theresa Beckley (CIV APP 15 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 13 (11 July 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: An appellate court will not interfere with a trial court's assessment of damages unless the figure is so generous as to show it was assessed on a wrong principle.
- Asante v S (J8A/09/2025) [2025] GHASC 41 (12 June 2025)
Ghana · 2025
Principle established: New evidence will not be allowed on appeal unless the court is satisfied that, with due diligence, the evidence was not available to the party during the original trial.
- Attorney General & Minister of Justice v Horse Fishing Company Ltd (SC CIV APP 3 of 2018) [2021] SLSC 1 (13 January 2021)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2021
Principle established: The Supreme Court will hear appeals from the Court of Appeal on significant points of law or where there has been a miscarriage of justice in the lower courts.
- Attorney-General & Bejet Jojo (CR APP 6 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1222 (12 February 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: An appellate court should only interfere with a trial court's sentencing discretion where the trial court exercised that discretion on a wrong principle.
- Attorney-General v Bejet Jojo (CR APP 6 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1249 (12 February 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: An appellate court will disturb a trial court's sentence only if it is evident that the sentencing discretion was exercised on a wrong principle.
- Augustine Sankoh V Mamoud Aboubakarr Sesay (MISC APP 3 of 2012) [2012] SLCA 24 (21 June 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: An applicant may move to set aside an order dismissing an appeal and restore it for hearing while seeking a stay of execution of the underlying judgment.
- Bai Bangura v Mamadu Jalloh (SC CIV APP 3 of 2009) [2015] SLSC 1207 (10 November 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: Procedural irregularities in entering an action for trial are not necessarily fatal and do not render the proceedings void if they do not result in a miscarriage of justice.
- Bai Bangura v Mamadu Jalloh (SC CIV APP 3 of 2009) [2015] SLSC 1212 (10 November 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: Appellate courts must determine whether a failure to strictly comply with procedural rules for entering an action for trial constitutes a fatal irregularity that voids the proceedings.
- Bai Bangura v Mamadu Jalloh (SC CIV APP 3 of 2009) [2015] SLSC 1213 (10 November 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: A court evaluates whether an irregularity in trial entry is so fatal as to render the proceedings void, or if the action was effectively entered despite non-compliance with specific rules.
- Balogun Francis v Augusta Gibson (CIV APP 51 of 2010) [2018] SLCA 1279 (24 January 2018)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2018
Principle established: A trial judge must consider whether questions of law are suitable for determination without a full trial and whether such determination will finally resolve the matter.
- Bandoe v Jacob (WACA CIV APP 2 of 1955) [1955] SLCA 2 (17 June 1955)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1955
Principle established: The defense of inevitable accident need not be specially pleaded and is open under a plea of no negligence, and an unpleaded ground may be considered on appeal if justice warrants.
- Bandoe v Jacob, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 406
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: A defendant may raise inevitable accident under a plea denying negligence without pleading it specifically, and an appellate court may consider unpleaded points if justice requires and the respondent has notice.
- Bangura (M.) v R, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 214
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: The absence of a recorded summing-up is not fatal to a conviction where the evidence clearly supports a unanimous verdict and raises no difficult issues.
- Bangura (M) v. R (39 of 1964) [1965] SLCA 2 (8 March 1965)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1965
Principle established: The failure to record a judge's summing-up does not vitiate a conviction where the jury returned a unanimous verdict clearly supported by the evidence and raising no complex issues.
- Bangura v Sierra Leone Electricity Corporation (SC CIV APP 10 of 1981) [1983] SLSC 15 (5 May 1983)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1983
Principle established: Summary dismissal is only justified where the employee's misconduct is gravely incompatible with the employment, and an appellate court may evaluate overall evidence when not disturbing findings based on witness credibility.
- Basma & Macauley v Attorney-General & Minister of Justice (CIV APP 7 of 2020) [2021] SLCA 28 (31 May 2021)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2021
Principle established: An appellate court may allow the introduction of new evidence if it is relevant, credible, and could not have been reasonably obtained during the original proceedings.
