
Tort
Area of law. 458 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- A G Spalding & Bros v A W Gamage Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1915
Principle established: Passing off protects the property in the business or goodwill likely to be injured by misrepresentation (Lord Parker).
- Abubakarr Finnoh And Another v Miss Vida Yamoah (CIV APP 61 of 2011) [2012] SLCA 31 (21 May 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: A plaintiff in an action for declaration of title must succeed on the strength of their own title and not on the weakness of the defendant's title.
- Adams v Coleridge
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1884
Principle established: A near relative or close friend may warn a woman about the character of a man she plans to marry.
- Agip (SL) Ltd v Edmask And Another (SC CIV APP 10 of 1972) [1973] SLSC 5 (24 May 1973)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1973
Principle established: A landlord's acceptance of rent with knowledge of a tenant's breach constitutes a waiver of the breach as a matter of law, regardless of the landlord's subjective intent.
- Alexander v North Eastern Railway Co
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1865
Principle established: Justification succeeded where the statement was true in substance, though inaccurate in a detail (the length of a prison term).
- Alfred James Shorunkeh-sawyerr & Anor & J. S. Bissett [1924] SLCA 1 (1 December 1924)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1924
Principle established: A claim for trespass fails if the disputed land is not within the property owned by the plaintiff or was validly acquired under statutory powers by the state.
- Alhadi v Allie (19 of 1951) [1951] SLCA 3 (14 December 1951)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1951
Principle established: In malicious prosecution, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving absence of reasonable and probable cause, and malice is necessarily inferred when the prosecutor knowingly suborns perjured evidence.
- Alhadi v Allie, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 147
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: In malicious prosecution, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving absence of reasonable and probable cause, and malice is necessarily inferred when the prosecutor knowingly suborns perjured evidence.
- Allan v Heyward
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts
Principle established: An independent contractor decides for himself how the work is done.
- Allie M. Jaward v J. T. Chanrai & Co. (Sierra Leone) Ltd (CC 275 of 1961) [1962] SLSC 16 (26 January 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: Damages for a constructive total loss of a vehicle are measured by the pre-accident market value minus salvage value, plus the reasonable cost of hiring a substitute.
- Allie M. Jaward v J.T. Chanerai & Co Ltd (CC 275 of 1961) [1962] SLSC 45 (26 January 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: Damages for a vehicle destroyed as a constructive total loss equal its pre-accident market value less scrap value, plus the cost of hiring a temporary substitute for a reasonable period.
- Allsop v Church of England Newspaper Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1972
Principle established: Where words can carry meanings beyond the dictionary sense, the claimant must set them out in the pleadings.
- Alpha Kamara v S. A. T. Koroma (43 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 11 (30 September 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A magistrate must consider the whole of the evidence before refusing to commit an accused for trial, and any person aggrieved may appeal questions of law.
- American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1975
Principle established: The court asks: is there a serious question to be tried? Would damages be an adequate remedy? Where does the balance of convenience lie?
- Angelina O'reilly & George W. Page [1921] SLCA 1 (30 June 1921)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1921
Principle established: A public officer does not ratify an unlawful subordinate arrest merely by briefly detaining the person to prepare a summons and arranging lawful conveyance.
- Angelina O'Reilly v George W. Page (1 of 1914) [1914] SLCA 1 (30 June 1914)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1914
Principle established: A public officer does not ratify an unlawful arrest by a subordinate merely by detaining the person briefly to prepare a summons and sending them home in company with a constable.
- Anns v Merton London Borough Council
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1978
Principle established: Lord Wilberforce's two-stage test: (1) sufficient proximity/foreseeability; (2) any policy reasons to negate or limit the duty.
- APPIAH VRS YUMIN & ANOR (J7/14/2024) [2024] GHASC 52 (30 October 2024)
Ghana · 2024
Principle established: Review jurisdiction is sparingly exercised and will be dismissed if the applicant fails to demonstrate an exceptional circumstance or a fundamental error in the original judgment.
- Armory v Delamirie
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1722
Principle established: A finder has a right to the thing against everyone except the true owner.
- Arnaud France v Commissioner of Police (MAG APP 29 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 2 (19 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: Even if a driver improperly enters a street, an oncoming driver remains under a duty of care to avoid a collision if it can be averted by ordinary care.
- Arnaud France v Commissioner of Police (MAG APP 29 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 31 (19 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A driver owes a duty to exercise ordinary care to avoid a collision even when another vehicle has wrongfully entered the roadway.
- Arthur Massally v Theresa Beckley (CIV APP 15 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 13 (11 July 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: An appellate court will not interfere with a trial court's assessment of damages unless the figure is so generous as to show it was assessed on a wrong principle.
- Astaire v Campling
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1966
Principle established: Words are read in their natural and ordinary meaning, as reasonable people would understand them (Diplock LJ).
- Att.-Gen. v Holden, 1957-60 ALR S.L. 20
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1957-60
Principle established: A presiding election officer with a duty to maintain order at a polling station may use necessary force without committing assault to remove a person who refuses to behave.
- Attia v British Gas plc
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1988
Principle established: Psychiatric harm caused by witnessing damage to property may be actionable.
- Attorney-General v PYA Quarries Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1957
Principle established: A public nuisance materially affects the reasonable comfort and convenience of a class of the public. The class need not be every member of it.
- Bahsali v Manso, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 246
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: Goods supplied to an infant for trading are not necessaries, and infancy is an absolute bar to an action even if the contract was induced by fraudulent misrepresentation of age.
- Bakare v Ibrahim
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1973
Principle established: Express malice is any wrong or corrupt motive, or using the occasion for an indirect purpose.
- Bakare v Ishola
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1959
Principle established: Words like 'thief, ex-convict' shouted during a fight were mere vulgar abuse.
- Bandoe v Jacob (WACA CIV APP 2 of 1955) [1955] SLCA 2 (17 June 1955)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1955
Principle established: The defense of inevitable accident need not be specially pleaded and is open under a plea of no negligence, and an unpleaded ground may be considered on appeal if justice warrants.
- Bandoe v Jacob, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 406
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: A defendant may raise inevitable accident under a plea denying negligence without pleading it specifically, and an appellate court may consider unpleaded points if justice requires and the respondent has notice.
- Bankole-Bright v Boston, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 410
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: Words imputing professional incompetence, financial bankruptcy, or dishonourable conduct to a professional person are defamatory and actionable per se.
- Bankole-Bright v Crompton, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 159
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: Damages for defamation are categorized into contemptuous, nominal, substantial, and exemplary awards depending on plaintiff injury, conduct, and the necessity of vindication.
- Barkway v South Wales Transport Co Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1950
Principle established: The maxim does not apply where the cause of the accident is known.
- Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1969
Principle established: The 'but for' test: the claimant must show that but for the breach the damage would not have occurred.
- Basely v Clarkson
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1681
Principle established: Trespass to land does not need an intention to trespass. It is enough that the entry was voluntary; a mistake about ownership is no defence.
- Basma v Jaber, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 226
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: A writ of possession requires proof of service and disobedience, and execution executed without lawful authority constitutes a tort where damages are assessed as against a private wrongdoer.
- Beard v London General Omnibus Co
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1900
Principle established: Acts outside the class of acts the servant is employed to do are not in the course of employment.
- Beckley v Sierra Leone Brewery Ltd, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 1
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: In a negligence claim against a manufacturer, the burden of proof is not discharged if the evidence shows the injury was equally consistent with causes other than the defendant's negligence.
- Behrens v Bertram Mills Circus Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1957
Principle established: An animal of a dangerous species (ferae naturae) is treated as dangerous whatever the individual animal is like. The keeper is strictly liable.
