
Personal injury
Theme. 111 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Allie M. Jaward v J. T. Chanrai & Co. (Sierra Leone) Ltd (CC 275 of 1961) [1962] SLSC 16 (26 January 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: Damages for a constructive total loss of a vehicle are measured by the pre-accident market value minus salvage value, plus the reasonable cost of hiring a substitute.
- Allie M. Jaward v J.T. Chanerai & Co Ltd (CC 275 of 1961) [1962] SLSC 45 (26 January 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: Damages for a vehicle destroyed as a constructive total loss equal its pre-accident market value less scrap value, plus the cost of hiring a temporary substitute for a reasonable period.
- Alpha Kamara v S. A. T. Koroma (43 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 11 (30 September 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A magistrate must consider the whole of the evidence before refusing to commit an accused for trial, and any person aggrieved may appeal questions of law.
- APPIAH VRS YUMIN & ANOR (J7/14/2024) [2024] GHASC 52 (30 October 2024)
Ghana · 2024
Principle established: Review jurisdiction is sparingly exercised and will be dismissed if the applicant fails to demonstrate an exceptional circumstance or a fundamental error in the original judgment.
- Arnaud France v Commissioner of Police (MAG APP 29 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 2 (19 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: Even if a driver improperly enters a street, an oncoming driver remains under a duty of care to avoid a collision if it can be averted by ordinary care.
- Arnaud France v Commissioner of Police (MAG APP 29 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 31 (19 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A driver owes a duty to exercise ordinary care to avoid a collision even when another vehicle has wrongfully entered the roadway.
- Arthur Massally v Theresa Beckley (CIV APP 15 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 13 (11 July 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: An appellate court will not interfere with a trial court's assessment of damages unless the figure is so generous as to show it was assessed on a wrong principle.
- Attia v British Gas plc
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1988
Principle established: Psychiatric harm caused by witnessing damage to property may be actionable.
- Barkway v South Wales Transport Co Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1950
Principle established: The maxim does not apply where the cause of the accident is known.
- Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1969
Principle established: The 'but for' test: the claimant must show that but for the breach the damage would not have occurred.
- Behrens v Bertram Mills Circus Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1957
Principle established: An animal of a dangerous species (ferae naturae) is treated as dangerous whatever the individual animal is like. The keeper is strictly liable.
- Benard Mutiso Mutisya v Joseph Wamburu Tumbu [2018] KEHC 2026 (KLR)
Kenya · 2018
Principle established: In a road traffic accident claim, the plaintiff must prove negligence on the part of the defendant's driver to recover damages for injuries sustained.
- Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Co
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1856
Principle established: Negligence is the omission to do something a reasonable man would do, or doing something a prudent and reasonable man would not do (Alderson B).
- Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1957
Principle established: A professional is judged by the standard of the ordinary skilled person professing that skill (McNair J).
- Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582 (26 February 1957)
United Kingdom · 1957
Principle established: A professional is not negligent if he acts in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of professional opinion.
- Bolton v Stone
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1951
Principle established: The likelihood of harm is weighed in deciding breach; a reasonable person need not guard against very small risks.
- Brice v Brown
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1984
Principle established: The eggshell rule applies to psychiatric harm.
- British Railways Board v Herrington
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1972
Principle established: An occupier owes trespassers a 'duty of common humanity': where he knows of a serious danger and the likely presence of trespassers, he must take the steps a humane person would take, judged by his own resources.
- British Transport Commission v Gourley
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1956
Principle established: Damages for lost earnings are based on what the claimant would actually have received, after tax.
- Byrne v Boadle
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1863
Principle established: Barrels do not fall from windows without negligence; the thing speaks for itself.
- Cartledge v E Jopling & Sons Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1963
Principle established: Under the old law, time ran from when the damage occurred, even if the claimant could not know of it.
- Clayton v Woodman & Son (Builders) Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1962
Principle established: Careless instructions that cause physical injury can give rise to liability.
- Conteh v Northern Assur. Co. Ltd, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 260
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: An insurer is bound to indemnify a permitted driver for liability arising from death or bodily injury, but a third party has no direct statutory right of action against the insurer for property damage.
- Cook v Beal
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1697
Principle established: Force used in self-defence must be reasonable and proportionate.
- De Freville v Dill
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1927
Principle established: Negligent statements that cause harm to the person are actionable.
- Donoghue v Stevenson
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1932
Principle established: Lord Atkin's neighbour principle: take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour.
- Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] UKHL 100 (26 May 1932)
United Kingdom · 1932
Principle established: A manufacturer owes a duty of care to the ultimate consumer to ensure products are free from defects likely to cause injury, regardless of a contractual relationship.
- Dulieu v White & Sons
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1901
Principle established: Nervous shock is recoverable where it arises from a reasonable fear of immediate personal injury; Kennedy J also stated the thin skull rule.
- Easson v London and North Eastern Railway Co
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1944
Principle established: Res ipsa loquitur requires the defendant's control of the thing causing harm.
- Ellor v Selfridge & Co Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1930
Principle established: A vehicle under the driver's control that mounts the pavement raises an inference of negligence.
- Fardon v Harcourt-Rivington
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1932
Principle established: Lord Dunedin: people must guard against reasonable probabilities, but not fantastic possibilities.
- Fitzgerald v E D and A D Cooke Bourne (Farms) Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1964
Principle established: For a domestic animal, scienter liability needs knowledge of a vicious or abnormal tendency. Playfulness normal to the species is not enough.
- Ford v Skinner
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1830
Principle established: The act comprising a battery must be done without the claimant's consent.
- Gee v Metropolitan Railway Co
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1873
Principle established: Where the train had only just left the station, the door was still under the company's control.
- Glasgow Corporation v Taylor
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1922
Principle established: A tempting danger can be an 'allurement' to children. An occupier must take more care for children than for adults.
- H West & Son Ltd v Shephard
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1964
Principle established: Damages for loss of amenity are awarded for the objective loss, even if the claimant cannot appreciate it.
- Hambrook v Stokes Bros
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1925
Principle established: Shock from fear for close family, perceived with one's own senses, can be recoverable.
- Hannah E. Grant v Karim Lawrence (CC 34 of 1962) [1963] SLSC 39 (16 September 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A driver is negligent if he fails to avert colliding with a pedestrian who has already progressed sufficiently into the roadway to be clearly visible.
- Hannah E. Grant, Administratrix of the Estate of William M. Grant, Deceased. v Karim Lawrence (CC 34 of 1962) [1963] SLSC 12 (16 September 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A pedestrian who has advanced sufficiently into the road is not guilty of contributory negligence for failing to check traffic where an oncoming driver could have avoided him.
- Haseldine v C A Daw & Son Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1941
Principle established: An occupier who reasonably entrusts technical work to a competent contractor is not liable for the contractor's negligent work.
