Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Byrne v Boadle

1863 · (1863) 2 H & C 722

Posted By lanbuk.com

Please note: Do not confuse this case (a barrel of flour) with Scott v London and St Katherine Docks (bags of sugar).

Facts

A barrel of flour fell from the window of the defendant's warehouse onto a passer-by.

Issue

Must the claimant prove exactly how the barrel fell?

Held

No; the fact of the accident was itself evidence of .

Principle

Barrels do not fall from windows without negligence; the thing speaks for itself.

Why it matters

The origin of .

Cited in these chapters

Cite this page

Byrne v Boadle (1863) 2 H & C 722 (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/byrne-v-boadle> accessed 31 October 2026

The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.

This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.