In simple terms
Once a is proved, the court must decide what the claimant gets. The main remedy is damages: money to put the claimant back where he would have been. The court may also order the to stop (or do) something, by an . In some cases the claimant may help himself, for example by removing a .
Damages: the basic aim
Damages in tort aim to put the claimant, as far as money can, in the position he would have been in if the tort had not happened: Livingstone v Rawyards Coal. This is called restitutio in integrum.
Kinds of damages
Nominal damages: A small sum to mark that a right was infringed where there is no real loss, common in .
Contemptuous damages: A tiny sum, where the court thinks the claim, though technically won, should not have been brought.
Compensatory damages: Compensation for loss. cover losses not precisely calculable, such as pain and suffering. cover exact money losses up to trial, such as medical bills and lost wages; these must be specifically pleaded and proved.
Aggravated damages: Extra compensation where the defendant's conduct, such as arrogance or insult, increased the claimant's hurt.
Exemplary damages: Damages to punish, beyond compensation. Under Rookes v Barnard they are allowed only for oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional acts by government servants, for conduct calculated to make a profit, or where statute allows. Cassell & Co v Broome confirmed these limits.
Personal injury damages
Pecuniary loss includes lost earnings (past and future) and medical and care costs. Lost earnings are measured after tax: British Transport Commission v Gourley.
Non-pecuniary loss covers pain and suffering and loss of amenity (loss of the ability to enjoy life). Loss of amenity is assessed objectively, even for a claimant who is unconscious: H West & Son v Shephard.
Limits on damages
The damage must be caused by the tort and not be (see The Wagon Mound (No 1)). The claimant must take reasonable steps to reduce his loss (), and may reduce the award.
Injunctions
An injunction is a court order. A prohibitory injunction orders the defendant to stop doing something; a mandatory injunction orders him to do something, such as removing a wall. It is an equitable remedy, so the court has discretion and may refuse it, for example where the claimant delayed or acted unfairly.
Interim injunctions: Granted before trial to hold the position. The court asks whether there is a serious question to be tried, whether damages would be an adequate remedy, and where the balance of convenience lies: American Cyanamid v Ethicon.
Mandatory and quia timet injunctions: Granted only where there is a strong probability of grave damage and the order is clear: Redland Bricks v Morris.
Damages instead of an injunction: The court may award damages instead of an injunction. Traditionally this was where the harm was small, measurable in money and an injunction would be oppressive: Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting. Modern courts are more flexible: Coventry v Lawrence.
Self-help
The law allows some self-help: removing a with reasonable force, abating a nuisance, taking back goods (recaption) and self-defence. Self-help must be reasonable and peaceful, and courts treat it with caution.
Memory map
Remedies in tort
Damages aim
- Restore position (Livingstone)
Kinds
- Nominal
- Contemptuous
- General and special
- Aggravated
- Exemplary (Rookes v Barnard)
Personal injury
- Lost earnings after tax (Gourley)
- Pain, suffering, amenity (West v Shephard)
Limits
- Causation and remoteness
- Mitigation
- Contributory negligence
Injunctions
- Prohibitory, mandatory
- Interim (American Cyanamid)
- Mandatory: strong probability (Redland)
- Damages in lieu (Shelfer)
Self-help
- Ejection
- Abatement
- Recaption
Words and Latin in this note
- Contributory
- A present or past member who may be liable to contribute to a company's assets in a winding up. In a company limited by shares the liability is limited to any amount unpaid on the shares. Open the note.
- Nuisance
- Unreasonable interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land (private nuisance) or with the rights of the public (public nuisance). Open the note.
Take-home points
- Damages aim to restore the claimant to the position before the tort (Livingstone v Rawyards Coal).
- Special damages must be pleaded and proved; general damages are assessed by the court.
- Exemplary damages are limited to the Rookes v Barnard categories.
- Injunctions are discretionary; interim injunctions follow the American Cyanamid test.
- Damages may be awarded instead of an injunction (Shelfer; Coventry v Lawrence).
- Self-help must be reasonable.
Cases in this chapter
- American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd
- British Transport Commission v Gourley
- Cassell & Co Ltd v Broome
- Coventry v Lawrence
- Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Co
- Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris
- Rookes v Barnard
- Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co
- The Wagon Mound (No 1)
- H West & Son Ltd v Shephard
Related case law
Full judgments on Lanbuk on the same areas of law.
Linked chapters
- Damage: causation and remoteness (shares 1 cases)
- Defamation: other defences and remedies (shares 1 cases)
- Private nuisance (shares 1 cases)
Cite this page
'Remedies in tort, Lanbuk on the Law of Torts' (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/remedies> accessed 31 October 2026
Related notes on Lanbuk
No other Lanbuk notes on this module yet. Browse the law notes.
Other law notes by subject
Arbitration
Business and human rights
Civil procedure
- The Slip Rule and Judicial Finality: Correcting Errors in Court Orders in the UK and Sierra Leone
- Sierra Leone's Court System and Starting Civil Proceedings in the High Court
- Who Addresses the Court First in Closing Speeches, and Why
- Disposal of Cases on Points of Law under Order 17
- Garnishee Proceedings under Order 50
- Interlocutory and Final Judgments
Constitutional and administrative law
Contract law
Criminal procedure
- No Case Submission: Interpreting 'Otherwise Deals in or With' under the National Drugs Control Act 2008
- Legal Authorities for a No Case Submission on Drug Importation Charges
- No Case to Answer: Analysis of a Drug Importation Prosecution
- Criminal Procedure: Law School Notes
- Submission of No Case to Answer: Dealing in Prohibited Drugs
Environmental and climate law
Equity and trusts
Exam preparation
Family law
Human rights
International law
Radiation and nuclear safety law
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts is for study only and is not legal advice. Always check the current law and consult a qualified lawyer.

