In simple terms
is an act or omission that endangers or seriously inconveniences the public, such as blocking a road or creating a danger on the highway. It is mainly a crime, but a person who suffers , beyond what everyone else suffers, can sue in .
What is public nuisance?
A public nuisance is one that materially affects the reasonable comfort and convenience of a class of the public. It need not affect every member of that class: Attorney-General v PYA Quarries. Examples include blocking a highway, dangerous structures next to a road, and pollution affecting a whole neighbourhood.
Public and private nuisance compared
Unlike private nuisance, the claimant does not need an interest in land. Public nuisance can also cover personal injury and financial loss. One set of facts can be both, as in Halsey v Esso Petroleum.
Who can bring proceedings?
Because it is a wrong against the public, the usual remedy is a prosecution or a civil action by the Attorney-General (a 'relator action') for an . An individual can sue in tort only if he suffers special damage, meaning harm different in kind or much greater than that of the public generally.
Special damage can be personal injury, as in Castle v St Augustine's Links, where a taxi driver lost an eye when a golf ball was sliced onto the road. It can be property damage or financial loss, as in Tate & Lyle v GLC, where silt blocked access to a jetty. Delay or inconvenience suffered by everyone is not enough.
Nuisance on the highway
Highway cases are the most common. A person who creates a danger on or next to the highway, or obstructs it unreasonably, may be liable. Temporary and reasonable obstructions, such as unloading a lorry, are allowed.
Defences and remedies
Statutory authority and the defences to (such as ) may apply. is not a defence to public nuisance. The remedies are damages for the person who suffered special damage and an injunction.
Memory map
Public nuisance
Definition
- Affects a class of the public (PYA Quarries)
- Crime and tort
Who sues
- Attorney-General
- Individual with special damage
Special damage
- Personal injury (Castle)
- Financial loss (Tate & Lyle)
- More than general inconvenience
Contrast with private
- No land interest needed
- Personal injury recoverable
- No prescription
Words and Latin in this note
- Contributory
- A present or past member who may be liable to contribute to a company's assets in a winding up. In a company limited by shares the liability is limited to any amount unpaid on the shares. Open the note.
- Nuisance
- Unreasonable interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land (private nuisance) or with the rights of the public (public nuisance). Open the note.
Take-home points
- Public nuisance materially affects the comfort or convenience of a class of the public (AG v PYA Quarries).
- It is a crime, but an individual can sue in tort if he suffers special damage.
- Special damage can be injury, property damage or financial loss beyond the public's (Castle; Tate & Lyle).
- No interest in land is needed, unlike private nuisance.
- Prescription is not a defence to public nuisance.
Cases in this chapter
- Attorney-General v PYA Quarries Ltd
- Castle v St Augustine's Links Ltd
- Halsey v Esso Petroleum Co Ltd
- Tate & Lyle Industries Ltd v Greater London Council
Related case law
Full judgments on Lanbuk on the same areas of law.
Linked chapters
- Private nuisance (shares 1 cases)
Cite this page
'Public nuisance, Lanbuk on the Law of Torts' (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/public-nuisance> accessed 31 October 2026
Related notes on Lanbuk
No other Lanbuk notes on this module yet. Browse the law notes.
Other law notes by subject
Arbitration
Business and human rights
Civil procedure
- The Slip Rule and Judicial Finality: Correcting Errors in Court Orders in the UK and Sierra Leone
- Sierra Leone's Court System and Starting Civil Proceedings in the High Court
- Who Addresses the Court First in Closing Speeches, and Why
- Disposal of Cases on Points of Law under Order 17
- Garnishee Proceedings under Order 50
- Interlocutory and Final Judgments
Constitutional and administrative law
Contract law
Criminal procedure
- No Case Submission: Interpreting 'Otherwise Deals in or With' under the National Drugs Control Act 2008
- Legal Authorities for a No Case Submission on Drug Importation Charges
- No Case to Answer: Analysis of a Drug Importation Prosecution
- Criminal Procedure: Law School Notes
- Submission of No Case to Answer: Dealing in Prohibited Drugs
Environmental and climate law
Equity and trusts
Exam preparation
Family law
Human rights
International law
Radiation and nuclear safety law
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts is for study only and is not legal advice. Always check the current law and consult a qualified lawyer.

