Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Tate & Lyle Industries Ltd v Greater London Council

1983 · [1983] 2 AC 509

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts

Ferry terminals built by the GLC caused silt to build up in the Thames, so Tate & Lyle had to pay for dredging to reach its jetty.

Issue

Can a person recover for caused by a ?

Held

The GLC was liable in public nuisance.

Principle

An individual can sue in public nuisance where he suffers special damage, beyond that suffered by the public in general.

Why it matters

Shows special damage in public nuisance can include financial loss.

Cited in these chapters

Cite this page

Tate & Lyle Industries Ltd v Greater London Council [1983] 2 AC 509 (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/tate-and-lyle-v-glc> accessed 31 October 2026

The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.

This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.