Facts
Digging on the defendant's land caused the claimants' land to slip, with a risk of more slips.
Issue
When will a mandatory be granted to prevent future harm?
Held
The mandatory injunction was discharged, as it was too vague and costly.
Principle
A mandatory injunction is granted only where there is a very strong probability of grave future damage. The order must be clear about what the must do.
Why it matters
Leading case on mandatory injunctions.
Cited in these chapters
Cite this page
Redland Bricks Ltd v Morris [1970] AC 652 (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/redland-bricks-v-morris> accessed 31 October 2026
The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.
This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.

