Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Reddaway v Banham

1896 · [1896] AC 199

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts

Reddaway sold belting called 'Camel Hair Belting'. A former employee sold belting under the same description; it was in fact made of camel hair.

Issue

Can a descriptive name acquire a secondary meaning?

Held

Yes; an was granted.

Principle

A descriptive name that has come to mean the claimant's goods is protected, but the burden is heavy.

Why it matters

Secondary meaning.

Cited in these chapters

Cite this page

Reddaway v Banham [1896] AC 199 (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/reddaway-v-banham> accessed 31 October 2026

The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.

This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.