Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

British Railways Board v Herrington

1972 · [1972] AC 877

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts

A six-year-old boy went through a broken fence beside an electrified railway line and was badly burned. The Board knew the fence was broken and that people crossed there.

Issue

Does an occupier owe any duty to a child ?

Held

The Board was liable.

Principle

An occupier owes trespassers a 'duty of common humanity': where he knows of a serious danger and the likely presence of trespassers, he must take the steps a humane person would take, judged by his own resources.

Why it matters

Moved the common law away from Addie v Dumbreck. Persuasive in Sierra Leone.

Cited in these chapters

Cite this page

British Railways Board v Herrington [1972] AC 877 (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/british-railways-board-v-herrington> accessed 31 October 2026

The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.

This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.