
Family and inheritance
Theme. 230 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Abubakarr K.Bangura v Isata B.Kamara (MISC APP 23 of 2023) [2024] SLCA 1 (13 February 2024)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2024
Principle established: Applications for enlargement of time must generally be made in the High Court first; the Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to hear such applications unless they were first refused below.
- Adams v Coleridge
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1884
Principle established: A near relative or close friend may warn a woman about the character of a man she plans to marry.
- Administrator General v Biakieu (SC CIV APP 2 of 1972) [1973] SLSC 4 (3 June 1973)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1973
Principle established: An applicant seeking letters of administration under the Mohammedan Marriage Act must prove he is the deceased's eldest brother, and the Administrator-General acting bona fide is entitled to costs out of the estate.
- Administrator-General v Biakieu (CIV APP 2 of 1972) [1973] SLSC 7 (3 July 1973)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1973
Principle established: An Administrator-General appearing in an official capacity cannot be made personally liable for costs due to an irregularity in appointment, and an error of law justifies an appellate court reversing a costs order.
- Admor.-Gen. v Biakieu, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 310
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: An error of law affecting costs justifies an appellate court in setting aside a costs order, and an Administrator-General acting officially cannot be made personally liable due to an appointment irregularity.
- Admor.-Gen. v Wilson, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 79
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: The Administrator-General must obtain letters of administration before commencing a declaratory action in respect of property devolving upon him at the death of an intestate.
- Aiah Momoh v Sahr S. Nyandemoh (CIV APP 70 of 2017) [2023] SLCA 7 (20 July 2023)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2023
Principle established: Findings of fact by a trial judge, particularly regarding the source of funds for property acquisition and the credibility of witnesses, will generally be upheld unless shown to be clearly erroneous.
- Alhaji Mohamed Barrie v Francis Musa Kutubu (CIV APP 40 of 2009) [2015] SLCA 1120 (15 March 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: In Sierra Leone, the validity of an assent to beneficiaries is governed by local law and applicable English statutes of general application as of 1880.
- Andre Zachariah V Zaida Zachariah & ORS (CIV APP 55 of 2013) [2015] SLCA 1125 (14 July 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: Under the Devolution of Estates Act 2007, children born out of wedlock are not discriminated against and are entitled to share in the residue of their father's estate.
- Asiegbu v Asiegbu, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 270
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: The court has jurisdiction to grant a divorce decree on the cross-petition of a non-domiciled husband where the wife has resided within the jurisdiction for three years prior to filing.
- Att.-Gen. v Akar, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 381
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68
Principle established: The words 'equal enjoyment' in a testamentary devise to two persons during their lives do not constitute words of severance, creating a joint tenancy rather than a tenancy in common.
- Bailey v Cline-Cole & Ors (CIVIL CASE 229 of 1967) [1968] SLSC 1252 (18 March 1968)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1968
Principle established: A devise to two persons in equal enjoyment during their natural lives followed by a gift over after their death creates a joint tenancy, as equal enjoyment lacks words of severance.
- Bangura v Davies, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 52
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: A devise referring to premises where a beneficiary is 'at present living' indicates an intention that the will speaks from the date of execution rather than death.
- Bangura v. Davies & Another (CC 284 of 1963) [1964] SLSC 4 (19 May 1964)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1964
Principle established: A will made by a lay person devising a specified area of land will be construed as referring to that area more or less without requiring strict scientific measurement.
- Basma v Dizengoff (West Africa), Limited (CC 312 of 1963) [1964] SLSC 2 (13 February 1964)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1964
Principle established: Recitals in deeds describing property purchased by a married woman before 1933 as her separate estate raise a rebuttable presumption in her favour.
- Bright v Bright (CIV APP 61 of 2008) [2012] SLCA 16 (8 August 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: A court may order the sale of a matrimonial home and equal division of proceeds where one spouse has no valid defence to a claim for partition or sale.
- Carew v Carew & Another (1 of 1934) [1934] SLCA 1 (10 October 1934)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1934
Principle established: A lost will may be proved by parol evidence alone, but the court must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of its due execution, existence, and contents.
- Carew v Carew, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 367
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: A lost will may be proved by parol evidence alone, but the court must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt as to its due execution, existence, and precise contents.
- Charlie Inniss & Another v Ayodele A. Wray (CC 356 of 1962) [1963] SLSC 32 (5 July 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A person preparing a will taking benefits must dispel the court's suspicion, and the destruction of a prior will by the testator with corroborating words demonstrates animus revocandi.
- Charlie Inniss v Gifty E. Stevens v Ayodele A. Wray (CC 356 of 1962) [1963] SLSC 3 (5 July 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: Where a party prepares a will under which they benefit, they bear the burden of removing the court's suspicion of invalidity.
- Claud Denvers Richards & Other & Eustace De Kola. Richards & Ors [1922] SLCA 10 (14 February 1922)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1922
Principle established: A special power of appointment among children cannot be exercised when there are no legitimate children, and a general power may be executed by express reference in a will under statutory provisions.
- Davies v Davies (25 of 1963) [1964] SLSC 12 (24 July 1964)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1964
Principle established: Judicial notice may be taken of the mental state of a pregnant woman threatened with violence, and medical evidence is highly desirable in divorce suits based on cruelty.
- Davies v Davies (CIV APP 12 of 1964) [1964] SLCA 16 (18 November 1964)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1964
Principle established: Cruelty as a ground for divorce must be grave and weighty as between the parties themselves and must be judged subjectively.
- Davies v Davies, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 187
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: Cruelty as a ground for divorce must be grave and weighty as between the parties themselves and should be judged subjectively rather than objectively.
- Decker v Decker, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 334
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: An application to strike off a named party in a divorce suit for failure to formally join her is belated when raised only during counsel's final address after she was served.
- Decker v. Decker & Others (DIV C 5 of 1964) [1966] SLSC 5 (7 January 1966)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1966
Principle established: An application made during closing argument to dismiss a named woman who was served but did not enter an appearance is made too late and will not be granted.
- DR. Nathalie Koto Eleady-Cole & ANOR V Rose Marie Marke & ORS (CIV APP 41 of 2012) [2012] SLCA 27 (10 July 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: Where there are contentious issues in a legal dispute, the proceedings should be initiated by a writ of summons rather than an originating summons.
- Eleady-cole & Anor v Marke & 5 Others (CIV APP 41 of 2012) [2012] SLCA 14 (10 July 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: Legal proceedings involving contentious issues must be commenced by a writ of summons to allow for adequate resolution of the dispute.
- Enitor Thomas & Others v Sonnie S. Kpeho & Another (CIV APP 11 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 51 (12 November 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: Where a defendant disputes liability to account, the trial judge must determine that preliminary issue before ordering an account against defendants who have been served.
- Enitor Thomas & Others v Sonnie Sahr Kpeho & Another (CIV APP 11 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 24 (12 November 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: When a defendant raises a prima facie defence denying that plaintiffs are entitled to an account, the judge must first try that preliminary question before making an order for accounts.
- Evelyn Ayo Pratt NO v Jacquelyn Carew & Ors (CIV APP 5 of 2005) [2005] SLSC 1 (5 January 2005)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2005
Principle established: An interlocutory application brought on behalf of a deceased party without an application for substitution, evidence of authority, or proof of letters of administration is fatally defective and must be dismissed.
- Eyamide Jones Harding V Ade E. S. Palmer (MISC APP 214 of 2013) [2014] SLCA 4 (26 March 2014)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2014
Principle established: An action may be struck out as an abuse of process if it seeks to re-litigate issues that have already been adjudicated upon by a court of competent jurisdiction.
- Feisal v Basma, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 317
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: A testamentary devise that property be used as family property manifests an intent to benefit the testator's overall family, creating a joint tenancy among the named devisees rather than a severed tenancy.
- Frederick B. Williams v Virginia Williams & Anor (DIV C 13 of 1960) [1961] SLSC 12 (13 August 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: Adultery in divorce proceedings requires strict proof beyond reasonable doubt, and prior condonation of cruelty is revived and cancelled by subsequent acts of cruelty.
- Frederick B. Williams v Virginia Williams & Anor (DIV C 13 of 1960) [1961] SLSC 9 (18 August 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: Adultery must be proved beyond reasonable doubt under the criminal standard of proof, and condonation of marital cruelty is cancelled by subsequent acts of cruelty.
- Friday v Conteh (CIV APP 13 of 1972) [1973] SLCA 2 (3 April 1973)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1973
Principle established: Because Kroo customary law does not recognize the concept of next of kin, a grant of letters of administration on that basis is invalid and the estate must be administered by the Administrator-General.
- Friday v Conteh, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 288
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: Kroo customary law does not recognize the concept of 'next of kin', rendering a grant of letters of administration on that basis void and requiring estate administration by the Administrator-General.
- Garber v Savage, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 230
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: An administrator selling intestate real property to pay debts must still obtain the consent of beneficiaries or a court order, as debt administration provisions do not override statutory beneficiary protections.
- Genevieve Sherman v Haresh Budhwani (SC MISC APP 2 of 2015) [2016] SLSC 1172 (11 February 2016)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2016
Principle established: The Supreme Court may exercise supervisory jurisdiction over High Court matters involving the administration of estates and land disputes to ensure procedural regularity and justice.
- Genieve Sherman v Haresh Budhwani (SC MISC APP 2 of 2015) [2016] SLSC 1171 (17 February 2016)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2016
Principle established: Supervisory jurisdiction is invoked to address issues in the lower courts regarding the administration of estates and the devolution of property among competing claimants.
