
Courts and procedure
Theme. 1081 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Abdallah v Barlatt (1 of 1931) [1931] SLCA 1 (14 October 1931)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1931
Principle established: An agreement between a solicitor and client for a percentage of litigation proceeds is champertous and illegal, and an appellate court will take notice of such illegality even if unpleaded.
- Abdallah v Barlatt, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 265
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: An agreement whereby a solicitor takes a percentage of litigation proceeds is champertous and illegal, and an appellate court will take notice of such illegality even if not pleaded below.
- Abdul Bai K.Amara v R (CR APP 45 of 1960) [1961] SLCA 2 (4 April 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: An appellate court has no statutory power to increase a sentence when the appellant has not appealed against sentence.
- Abdul Karim Sesay v Attorney-General & Anor (MISC APP 19 of 2015) [2016] SLCA 1182 (28 January 2016)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2016
Principle established: A party refused leave to appeal by the High Court may apply directly to the Court of Appeal for leave to appeal against an interlocutory ruling.
- Abdul Rahman Jalloh v The West Africa Regional Director (CIV APP 2 of 2009) [2015] SLSC 1210 (24 November 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: The Supreme Court hears cross-appeals from the Court of Appeal to determine the correctness of orders made in employment-related disputes.
- Abdulai Moijueh & 2 Others v Abu Smart (CIV APP 1 of 2011) [2015] SLCA 1133 (12 March 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: A High Court judge may err in law by ordering the transfer of a matter pending in a District Appeals Court to the High Court without proper statutory authority.
- Abdulai Moijueh & ORS V Abu Smart (CIV 1 of 2011) [2015] SLCA 1123 (12 March 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: The misapplication of statutory provisions regarding the transfer of cases between different levels of the court system constitutes a ground for setting aside a judicial order.
- Aboud v Mandi, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 240
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: A protectorate is not part of British dominions for the purpose of rule service provisions, requiring notice of a writ rather than the writ itself to be served.
- Abubakarr K.Bangura v Isata B.Kamara (MISC APP 23 of 2023) [2024] SLCA 1 (13 February 2024)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2024
Principle established: Applications for enlargement of time must generally be made in the High Court first; the Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to hear such applications unless they were first refused below.
- ADAM VRS NUAMAH (J4/09/2024) [2024] GHASC 49 (11 November 2024)
Ghana · 2024
Principle established: A judgment entered in default proceedings may be vacated on grounds of fraud, balancing the finality of litigation against the need to prevent the misuse of the court system.
- Adjei v Anas and Another (J7/06/2026) [2026] GHASC 37 (11 February 2026)
Ghana · 2026
Principle established: A review application must disclose exceptional circumstances resulting in a miscarriage of justice and cannot be used as a mere re-argument of the original appeal.
- ADJEI VRS ANAS AND ANOR (J7/06/2026) [2026] GHASC 18 (11 February 2026)
Ghana · 2026
Principle established: A review application must disclose exceptional circumstances resulting in a miscarriage of justice and cannot be used as a mere re-argument of the original appeal.
- Administrator-General v Biakieu (CIV APP 2 of 1972) [1973] SLSC 7 (3 July 1973)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1973
Principle established: An Administrator-General appearing in an official capacity cannot be made personally liable for costs due to an irregularity in appointment, and an error of law justifies an appellate court reversing a costs order.
- Administrator-General v Biakieu (CIV APP 6 of 1972) [1972] SLCA 1287 (3 November 1972)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1972
Principle established: Leave to appeal against an order for costs may be granted where an issue of public importance arises, such as where a public officer is personally ordered to pay costs.
- Admor.-Gen. v Biakieu, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 154
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: Leave to appeal against an order for costs may be granted when a question of public importance is involved, such as where a public officer is ordered personally to pay costs.
- Admor.-Gen. v Biakieu, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 310
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: An error of law affecting costs justifies an appellate court in setting aside a costs order, and an Administrator-General acting officially cannot be made personally liable due to an appointment irregularity.
- AGIP (S.L.) Ltd v Edmask, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 218
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: A landlord's acceptance of rent with knowledge of a breach of covenant constitutes a waiver of the breach, regardless of whether waiver was intended.
- Agip v Edmask & Another (CIV APP 2 of 1971) [1973] SLSC 6 (28 February 1973)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1973
Principle established: A landlord's or authorized agent's acceptance of accrued rent with knowledge of a tenant's breach constitutes a waiver of that breach, irrespective of whether waiver was actually intended.
- Aiah Fengai & 73 Others & Marginalised Affected Property Owners v Octea Limited (CIV APP 73 of 2023) [2024] SLCA 3 (29 February 2024)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2024
Principle established: Whether a decision striking out a writ for lack of jurisdiction is interlocutory or final determines the procedure for seeking leave to appeal.
- Aiah Fengai & ORS v Octea Ltd (CivAPP 73/23) [2024] SLCA 2 (29 February 2024)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2024
Principle established: A court may grant leave to appeal against a decision striking out consolidated writs if it determines the decision was interlocutory rather than final.
- Air Cote d ivoire v Ibeachusi Okechukwu (CIV APP 89 of 2017) [2018] SLCA 1280 (22 November 2018)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2018
Principle established: Summary judgment should not be granted where there are triable issues of fact, such as whether a third party interfered with luggage under international aviation conventions.
- Alastair P. Mcneile v Commissioner of Police (13 of 61) [1961] SLSC 35 (14 August 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: A magistrate acts correctly in law by discharging an accused rather than acquitting and discharging him when criminal proceedings are terminated without a final determination on the merits.
- Alastair Peter McNeile v Commissioner of Police (MAG APP 13 of 1961) [1961] SLSC 7 (14 April 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: A magistrate acts correctly in point of law by ordering a discharge rather than an acquittal where the disposition does not bar the prosecution from reinstituting charges.
- Albert Genet & Fritz Schumacher & Alfred Straumann [1923] SLCA 4 (9 February 1923)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1923
Principle established: The constitution of an appellate court depends on proper statutory appointments and warrants validly conferring judicial authority for the duration of its sittings.
- Albert Genet & Fritz Schumacher & Alfred Straumann [1923] SLCA 5 (9 February 1923)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1923
Principle established: An application for conditional leave to appeal must be brought within the strict time limits prescribed by the rules, measured from the date of the decision.
- Alexander v North Eastern Railway Co
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1865
Principle established: Justification succeeded where the statement was true in substance, though inaccurate in a detail (the length of a prison term).
- Alfred James Shorunkeh-Sawyerr & Another v J. S. Bissett (10 of 1924) [1924] SLCA 10 (23 December 1924)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1924
Principle established: An application for leave to appeal to the Privy Council requires clear and admissible evidence that the matter in dispute satisfies the requisite monetary value threshold.
- Alhadi v Allie (19 of 1951) [1951] SLCA 3 (14 December 1951)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1951
Principle established: In malicious prosecution, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving absence of reasonable and probable cause, and malice is necessarily inferred when the prosecutor knowingly suborns perjured evidence.
- Alhadi v Allie, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 147
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: In malicious prosecution, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving absence of reasonable and probable cause, and malice is necessarily inferred when the prosecutor knowingly suborns perjured evidence.
- Alhaji A.B. Mansaray v Abdul M. Iscandri & ORS (SC MISC APP 6 of 1984) [1984] SLSC 3 (14 February 1984)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1984
Principle established: The Supreme Court will refuse an application for special leave to appeal where the applicant fails to demonstrate that it is a proper case for the court to exercise its discretion.
- Alhaji W. Jalloh v Istiasaco Enterprise (CIV APP 61 of 2013) [2021] SLCA 24 (4 November 2021)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2021
Principle established: Summary judgment should not be granted where the defendant's affidavit raises triable issues of fact or law that warrant a full trial on the merits.
- Alhaji Wurie Jalloh v Istiasaco Enterprises (CIV APP 61 of 2013) [2021] SLCA 9 (4 November 2021)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2021
Principle established: Summary judgment should not be granted where the defendant's affidavit raises triable issues of fact or law that warrant a full trial on the merits.
- Alhassan P. Kargbo & Another v Brima Jalloh (MISC APP 41 of 2011) [2012] SLSC 19 (5 January 2012)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2012
Principle established: A party may seek leave to amend court papers to correctly reflect their status as an appellant rather than an interested party.
- Ali v First Capital Bank (Commercial Cause 52 of 2024) [2024] MWHC 14 (15 April 2024)
Malawi · 2024
Principle established: A court may refuse or discharge an injunction where the claimant has failed to disclose material facts or has misled the court regarding related pending criminal proceedings.
- All People’s Congress v National Action for Social Mobilization Secretariat (NASMOS) & Another [1999] SLSC 8 (26 October 1999)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1999
Principle established: Section 133(1) of the 1991 Constitution abolished the procedural requirement for obtaining a fiat or petition of right to commence legal proceedings against the Government of Sierra Leone.
- Allie & Ors v Alhadi (Official Administrator) (WACA CIV APP 8 of 1950) [1950] SLCA 4 (28 November 1950)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1950
Principle established: On appeal, a new trial will not be ordered unless some substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has been occasioned at the first trial.
- Allie v Alhadi, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 261
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: An appellate court will not disturb or set aside concurrent findings of fact made by two courts below.
- Allie v Alhadi, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 72
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: The rule requiring criminal prosecution of a felony prior to maintaining a civil action for the same wrong does not apply where the civil defendant is an innocent third party.
- Allsop v Church of England Newspaper Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1972
Principle established: Where words can carry meanings beyond the dictionary sense, the claimant must set them out in the pleadings.
- Alpha Kamara v S. A. T. Koroma (43 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 11 (30 September 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A magistrate must consider the whole of the evidence before refusing to commit an accused for trial, and any person aggrieved may appeal questions of law.
