
Property crime
Theme. 87 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Alimu Bah V The State (CR APP 52 of 2010) [2014] SLCA 1 (6 May 2014)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2014
Principle established: In criminal cases involving the handling of project funds, the prosecution must establish the specific legal obligation of the accused to deal with the property in a particular manner.
- Armory v Delamirie
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1722
Principle established: A finder has a right to the thing against everyone except the true owner.
- Bah v S (CR APP 1 of 2012) [2012] SLCA 2 (7 February 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: A person convicted of receiving stolen goods may apply for bail pending appeal, although costs are generally not awarded in such criminal applications.
- Bah v S (CR APP 1 of 2012) [2015] SLCA 4 (23 June 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: An application for bail pending appeal may be considered by the Court of Appeal following a conviction for receiving stolen goods, often supported by medical or legal grounds.
- Bob Maloba Ogola v Republic [2017] KEHC 2026 (KLR)
Kenya · 2017
Principle established: A sentence for burglary following a plea of guilty may be challenged on appeal if it is considered harsh or excessive under the circumstances of the offence.
- Chikiwa v State (30 of 2024) [2024] ZWSC 30 (30 January 2024)
Zimbabwe · 2024
Principle established: An appellate court may set aside a conviction and sentence for unlawful entry while upholding a conviction for murder based on the specific evidence presented for each count.
- Cole v S (CR APP 2 of 1975) [1975] SLCA 1 (21 December 1975)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1975
Principle established: An indictment for embezzlement is defective if it omits the word "fraudulently", as fraudulent intention is an essential element that must be specifically averred in the particulars of offence.
- Cole v S (Criminal Appeal 2 of 1975) [1975] SLSC 5 (21 December 1975)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1975
Principle established: An indictment charging embezzlement must explicitly aver the element of fraudulent intention, and the omission of the word "fraudulently" renders the charge fatally defective.
- Columbus Moses Anriti Thompson v R (CR APP 20 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 12 (6 July 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: A trial judge summing up to assessors does not usurp their function or misdirect them where he accurately summarizes the evidence and fairly presents the defence.
- Daimba Allie v Attorney-General (MAG APP 51 of 1960) [1961] SLSC 17 (24 January 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: The burden of proof in criminal cases rests solely on the prosecution, and any shifting of the burden to the accused to establish innocence vitiates a conviction.
- David Kargbo V The State (CR APP 2 of 2012) [2012] SLCA 26 (8 March 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: An applicant convicted of receiving stolen goods and sentenced to imprisonment may apply for bail pending the determination of their appeal.
- Fofanah v S (CR APP 15 of 1975) [1976] SLCA 1 (23 March 1976)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1976
Principle established: A jury is entitled to proper guidance and assistance from the trial judge in evaluating conflicting evidence, and failure to provide it may render a verdict unsafe.
- Fofanah v S (Criminal Appeal 15 of 1975) [1975] SLSC 6 (23 March 1975)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1975
Principle established: Where evidence in a larceny trial is conflicting and complex, the trial judge must provide adequate guidance in summing up, failure of which renders a guilty verdict unsafe.
- Fornah & 14 Others v S (CR APP 31 of 1975) [1975] SLCA 2 (30 April 1975)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1975
Principle established: A conviction for larceny will be quashed where the trial judge fails to guide the jury on conflicting and complex evidence during the summing up.
- Garber v R, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 233
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: A storekeeper who receives his employer's goods into the store and subsequently removes them animo furandi commits larceny by a servant rather than embezzlement.
- Garber v. R (49 of 1964) [1965] SLCA 5 (18 March 1965)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1965
Principle established: A storekeeper who receives his employer's goods into the store and subsequently removes them animo furandi commits larceny by a servant rather than embezzlement.
- Henry Clement Solomon & Rex [1923] SLCA 8 (29 January 1923)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1923
Principle established: An employee commits larceny as a servant when they take funds belonging to their employer against instructions and without consent with the intent to permanently deprive.
- James Grant & Ors v R (CR APP 20 of 1961; CR APP 22 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 19 (6 November 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: An out-of-court statement by one accused implicating a co-accused is not evidence against that co-accused, and failure so to direct the jury vitiates that co-accused's conviction.
- Johannes Johnson v Regina (CR APP 7 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 1 (16 July 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: An appellate court will not disturb a jury's finding of guilt for larceny unless the verdict is unreasonable or unsupported by the evidence.
- Johannes Johnson v Regina (CR APP 7 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 30 (16 July 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: A conviction for larceny will be upheld on appeal if supported by sufficient credible evidence presented at trial.
- Julius v S (10 of 2026) [2026] ZWHHC 287 (13 February 2026)
Zimbabwe · 2026
Principle established: A court must exercise judicious discretion when determining bail, providing a full analysis of the grounds for refusal rather than merely reciting the law and parties' submissions.
- Kagonye v State (32 of 2024) [2024] ZWSC 32 (26 March 2024)
Zimbabwe · 2024
Principle established: A public official may be convicted of theft of trust property if they misappropriated assets entrusted to them in their official capacity.
- Kamara & 3 Others v S (CR APP 8 of 2010) [2012] SLCA 23 (29 November 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: Convictions for robbery with aggravation and wounding with intent may be appealed to the Court of Appeal to challenge the findings of the trial court.
- Kenny v S (SC CRIM APP 2 of 1982) [1983] SLSC 18 (28 May 1983)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1983
Principle established: To convict a person of fraudulent conversion, the prosecution must prove a fraudulent and dishonest intent, which may be inferred from the natural and probable consequences of the accused person's acts.
- Kirk v Gregory
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1876
Principle established: Any direct and unjustified interference with goods in another's possession is trespass, even moving them a short distance with good motives.
- Kulaishi v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 187 of 2024) [2024] UGCA 181 (17 July 2024)
Uganda · 2024
Principle established: The court may impose consecutive sentences for distinct offences like rape and aggravated robbery, provided the total sentence is proportionate to the gravity of the crimes.
- MAPHOSA v THE STATE (SC 07 of 2026) [2026] ZWSC 2 (9 January 2026)
Zimbabwe · 2026
Principle established: Unlawful possession of a specially protected animal trophy attracts a mandatory minimum sentence unless the accused demonstrates special circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense.
- Mohamed Amadu v Regina (CR APP 15 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 24 (30 October 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: A criminal conviction will be quashed where the trial judge errs by failing to present evidence favourable to the accused in the summing-up to the assessors.
- Mohamed Kallon v R (24 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 26 (15 November 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: The purchase of a second-hand item at a modest discount does not alone give rise to a legal inference that the buyer knew it was stolen.
- Musa v S (CR APP 7 of 1976) [1978] SLCA 2 (3 May 1978)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1978
Principle established: A conviction for obtaining money by false pretences cannot be sustained where there is insufficient evidence to prove the falsity of the pretence made.
- Mutakura v S (SC 766/25) [2026] ZWSC 14 (17 February 2026)
Zimbabwe · 2026
Principle established: A conviction for fraud will be upheld where the evidence establishes that the accused made a misrepresentation with the intent to defraud, resulting in prejudice.
- Ncube v S (HCBCR 1442/26) [2026] ZWBHC 117 (28 August 2026)
Zimbabwe · 2026
Principle established: Fraud is committed when a person makes a false representation with the intent to deceive, causing another person to act to their prejudice.
- Parker v S (CR APP 24 of 1975) [1976] SLCA 10 (26 October 1976)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1976
Principle established: Similar fact evidence is inadmissible to show a general disposition or propensity to commit a crime unless it has a specific and relevant connection to the charged act.
- R v Alhaji S. G. Seisay (35 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 24 (14 June 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: Conversion of funds received in the capacity of a school board manager constitutes criminal misappropriation rather than a breach of a separate trust deed.
- R v Arthur B. O. Williams (12 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 20 (2 July 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A charge of forgery and uttering cannot succeed without sufficient direct or circumstantial evidence establishing that the disputed document was indeed forged.
- R v Uzioigwe (Case No. 03 of 2024 (Being criminal case No. 05 of 2024)) [2024] MWHC 61 (20 November 2024)
Malawi · 2024
Principle established: In cases of illegal possession or attempted transfer of foreign currency, the court must determine whether the currency should be forfeited to the state or returned to the convict.
- Regina v Alhaji S.G Seisay (MAG APP 35 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 51 (14 June 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: Conversion of funds received as a school board manager constitutes criminal misappropriation rather than a breach of a separate trust deed.
- Regina v Amadu B. Chirm (CR APP 29 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1248 (11 December 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: A conviction for obtaining by false pretences requires satisfactory proof that the victims were actually influenced by the alleged false representations.
- Regina v Arthur B.O Williams (IC 12 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 47 (2 July 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A charge of forgery and uttering cannot succeed without sufficient direct or circumstantial evidence establishing that the disputed document was indeed forged.
- Republic v Ababio (EAS/AO/DC/B7/28/2026) [2026] GHADC 23 (29 July 2026)
Ghana · 2026
Principle established: A person commits the offence of stealing by dishonestly appropriating property, such as a vehicle, that was temporarily entrusted to them by the owner.
