Skip to content

Conversion

Doctrine in Tort. 13 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.

  • Armory v Delamirie

    Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1722

    Principle established: A finder has a right to the thing against everyone except the true owner.

  • Basma v Jaber, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 226

    Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56

    Principle established: A writ of possession requires proof of service and disobedience, and execution executed without lawful authority constitutes a tort where damages are assessed as against a private wrongdoer.

  • Dogbowu v R, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 232

    Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56

    Principle established: Where an execution is conducted without lawful authority so as to constitute a trespass or conversion, damages are assessed against the wrongdoer without regard to any official capacity.

  • Dogbowu v Reginam (WACA CR APP 7 of 1952) [1952] SLCA 1 (16 June 1952)

    Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1952

    Principle established: Where execution of process is wholly unauthorised and wrongful, it constitutes trespass or conversion, and damages are assessed as though the wrongdoer acted without official character.

  • Fouldes v Willoughby

    Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1841

    Principle established: Conversion requires a dealing that denies the owner's title or seriously interferes with his rights. A minor interference is only trespass.

  • General and Finance Facilities Ltd v Cooks Cars (Romford) Ltd

    Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1963

    Principle established: In detinue, the court may order (a) the value of the goods and damages, (b) return of the goods or their value, or (c) return of the goods and damages for detention.

  • Hollins v Fowler

    Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1875

    Principle established: Conversion is strict. Honestly dealing with goods in a way that denies the true owner's title is still conversion.

  • In re Hamilton, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 179

    Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56

    Principle established: The measure of damages in an action for conversion is the full value of the chattel at the date of the conversion.

  • Johnson v Singer Sewing Machine Co. Ltd, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 166

    Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68

    Principle established: Damages for detinue of a chattel used in a profitable business include both the cost of hiring a replacement and compensation for any consequent loss of business.

  • Johnson v Singer Sewing Machine Company Limited (CIVIL CASE 67 of 1966) [1967] SLSC 1241 (23 May 1967)

    Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1967

    Principle established: The measure of damages for wrongful detention of a profit-earning chattel covers the hire cost of a substitute machine and any proven loss of profits resulting from its diminished capacity.

  • Kirk v Gregory

    Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1876

    Principle established: Any direct and unjustified interference with goods in another's possession is trespass, even moving them a short distance with good motives.

  • Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (Nos 4 and 5)

    Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 2002

    Principle established: Conversion is a deliberate dealing with goods that is inconsistent with the owner's rights, so as to deprive him of the use or possession of them.

  • Parker v British Airways Board

    Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1982

    Principle established: An occupier only has a better right than a finder of goods lying loose on the premises if he clearly showed an intention to control the premises and things in it.