
Trespass to land
Doctrine in Tort. 28 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Abubakarr Finnoh And Another v Miss Vida Yamoah (CIV APP 61 of 2011) [2012] SLCA 31 (21 May 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: A plaintiff in an action for declaration of title must succeed on the strength of their own title and not on the weakness of the defendant's title.
- Basely v Clarkson
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1681
Principle established: Trespass to land does not need an intention to trespass. It is enough that the entry was voluntary; a mistake about ownership is no defence.
- Basma v Jaber, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 226
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: A writ of possession requires proof of service and disobedience, and execution executed without lawful authority constitutes a tort where damages are assessed as against a private wrongdoer.
- Bernstein of Leigh (Baron) v Skyviews & General Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1978
Principle established: An owner's rights in airspace extend only to the height needed for the ordinary use and enjoyment of the land.
- Chinhoyi Municipality v Musonza (110 of 2023) [2023] ZWSC 52 (31 October 2023)
Zimbabwe · 2023
Principle established: A local authority is entitled to an order of ejectment against an individual who occupies municipal land without a valid legal basis or through fraudulent means.
- Cole & Another v. Hotobah-During (CIV APP 10 of 1965) [1965] SLCA 10 (10 December 1965)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1965
Principle established: To succeed in trespass to land, plaintiffs must prove specific title; ambiguous evidence merely showing that either one or the other co-plaintiff had title is insufficient.
- Cole v Hotobah-During, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 293
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: An action in trespass to land cannot be maintained by co-plaintiffs if evidence leaves indeterminate which of them actually held title to the land at the time of the trespass.
- Collier v Williams (CIV APP 25 of 1966) [1967] SLCA 1246 (10 July 1967)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1967
Principle established: Because trespass to land is an actionable wrong against possession, only the person in actual or constructive possession at the time of the entry can maintain the action.
- Collier v Williams, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 197
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68
Principle established: Because trespass to land constitutes an injury to a possessory right, the proper party to institute an action is the person who held actual or constructive possession at the time.
- Cope v Sharpe (No 2)
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1912
Principle established: Necessity is a defence where there was a real threat and the defendant acted reasonably, even if it turned out his act was not needed.
- Dogbowu v R, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 232
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: Where an execution is conducted without lawful authority so as to constitute a trespass or conversion, damages are assessed against the wrongdoer without regard to any official capacity.
- Dogbowu v Reginam (WACA CR APP 7 of 1952) [1952] SLCA 1 (16 June 1952)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1952
Principle established: Where execution of process is wholly unauthorised and wrongful, it constitutes trespass or conversion, and damages are assessed as though the wrongdoer acted without official character.
- Entick v Carrington
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1765
Principle established: Every unauthorised entry on another's land is a trespass, even by state officials, unless the law clearly allows it.
- In re Hamilton, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 179
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: The measure of damages in an action for conversion is the full value of the chattel at the date of the conversion.
- John Kamara & ANOR V Victor Alphonso Deveneaux (CIV APP 4 of 2009) [2012] SLCA 28 (31 May 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: A claim for declaration of title and damages for trespass requires the plaintiff to prove ownership and entitlement to possession of the specific parcel of land.
- Kabajungu v Akgizibwe (Civil Appeal 73 of 2010) [2015] UGCA 2024 (3 November 2015)
Uganda · 2015
Principle established: A purchaser of land who encroaches beyond the boundaries specified in the sale agreement is a trespasser and may be subject to eviction orders.
- Kamara & Anor v Deveneaux (CIV APP 4 of 2009) [2012] SLCA 8 (31 May 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: A plaintiff seeking a declaration of title and an injunction against trespass must establish their ownership through valid conveyance and survey plans.
- Kanu v Kamara, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 136
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: Any clear and exclusive possession of land exercised with the intention to possess, or a valid documentary title derived from a person rightfully in possession, is sufficient to maintain an action for trespass.
- Kanu v. Kamara (CC 70 of 1963) [1964] SLSC 19 (3 October 1964)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1964
Principle established: Any clear and exclusive possession of land exercised with intent to possess is sufficient to support an action for trespass.
- Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1957
Principle established: The owner of land owns the airspace above it to a reasonable height, so a sign over the land is a trespass.
- League Against Cruel Sports Ltd v Scott
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1986
Principle established: Causing animals or things to enter another's land, intentionally or negligently, can be trespass.
- Macmillan v Fallah, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 274
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: The projection of building eaves over adjoining land constitutes an actionable nuisance rather than a trespass, and liability is established upon proof of encroachment without requiring proof of negligence or actual damage.
- Mary George v Mohamed Lamrana Sowe (CC 115 of 2017) [2019] SLCA 3 (15 July 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court considered an application to strike out a defense and enter judgment in a matter involving a declaration of title and damages for trespass to land.
- Rub Sayie (SL) Limited v Bazzy & Three Others (CC 205 of 2013) [2013] SLCA 13 (2 October 2013)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2013
Principle established: A fee simple owner of land may apply for an interlocutory injunction to prohibit others from trespassing or engaging in construction on the property pending trial.
- Sesay v Kargbo & ORS (SC CIV APP 1 of 1982) [1984] SLSC 7 (31 December 1984)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1984
Principle established: Proof of ownership is unnecessary to succeed in trespass to land, as the slightest degree of actual possession and acts asserting control are sufficient to maintain an action against an intruder.
- Sierra Leone Red Cross Society v Ayea R.Koroma (CIV APP 92 of 2019) [2022] SLCA 6 (27 October 2022)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2022
Principle established: A property owner or their administrator is entitled to recover possession and claim damages from a party that wrongfully occupies the land without legal title or permission.
- Tamba v Kai [1992] SLSC 3 (19 April 1992)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1992
Principle established: An appellate court should not overturn a trial judge's findings of fact supported by evidence, and an action in trespass requires proof of actual possession, which is a question of fact.
- The Six Carpenters' Case
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1610
Principle established: A person who enters under authority given by law and then abuses it by a positive act becomes a trespasser from the start (trespass ab initio). A mere omission, like not paying, is not enough.
