
Fundamental rights
Doctrine in Constitutional. 15 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Entick v Carrington
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1765
Principle established: Every unauthorised entry on another's land is a trespass, even by state officials, unless the law clearly allows it.
- Kamau v Karanja & another (Petition E005 of 2024) [2024] KESC 64 (KLR) (8 November 2024) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: A petition alleging constitutional violations must specifically identify the violated provisions and the limb of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction being invoked to avoid being struck out.
- Kamugisha Bernard v Uganda (Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 0047 of 2019) [2019] UGCA 2025 (18 November 2019)
Uganda · 2019
Principle established: An applicant may be granted bail pending appeal if they demonstrate substantial sureties, a fixed place of abode, and have previously honored bail conditions during trial.
- Macaulay v Macaulay (DIV C 27 of 1966) [1967] SLSC 1246 (4 January 1967)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1967
Principle established: A plaintiff cannot invoke constitutional redress for fundamental rights violations without alleging facts establishing a direct, special injury distinct from grievances shared in common with the general public.
- Macaulay v Macaulay, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 14
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68
Principle established: A litigant invoking constitutional fundamental rights enforcement must show direct personal injury or immediate threat thereof, rather than an indefinite likelihood of injury shared generally with the public.
- Machika v Makoni (271 of 2023) [2023] ZWHHC 249 (4 May 2023)
Zimbabwe · 2023
Principle established: In matters concerning children, the best interests of the child are paramount, and the court may consider applications for access by non-parents to maintain family ties.
- Ochieng v Attorney General (Petition E051 of 2025) [2026] KESC 32 (KLR) (15 May 2026) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2026
Principle established: The state is liable for damages where it is proven that an individual's fundamental rights and freedoms were violated during arrest and subsequent police detention.
- R v Khoviwa (Criminal Case 20 of 2023) [2023] MWHC 116 (20 December 2023)
Malawi · 2023
Principle established: Mandatory death sentences for murder are unconstitutional, and convicts sentenced under such provisions are entitled to a resentencing hearing where the court exercises its discretion.
- R v Thifu (Criminal Case 3 of 2023) [2023] MWHC 118 (20 December 2023)
Malawi · 2023
Principle established: Convicts previously sentenced to the mandatory death penalty for murder must be resentenced by a court that has the discretion to consider mitigating and aggravating factors.
- R v Tseka (Criminal Case 5 of 2023) [2023] MWHC 114 (20 December 2023)
Malawi · 2023
Principle established: The unconstitutionality of mandatory death sentences necessitates a judicial review of the sentence to ensure it is proportionate and based on the specific circumstances of the case.
- SKY VRS PARLIAMENT OF GHANA (J1/09/2024) [2024] GHASC 66 (18 December 2024)
Ghana · 2024
Principle established: The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to determine the constitutionality of a Bill passed by Parliament if it is alleged to violate fundamental human rights and freedoms.
- Steele & Ors v Attorney-General; Tejan-Sie v Koroma (CIVIL CASE 125 of 1966) [1967] SLSC 1210 (3 January 1967)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1967
Principle established: An applicant seeking constitutional redress for alleged violations of fundamental rights must allege facts demonstrating direct or immediately threatened special injury beyond that suffered generally by the public.
- Steele & Ors v Attorney-General; Tejan-Sie v Koroma (CIVIL CASE 125 of 1966) [1967] SLSC 1245 (3 January 1967)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1967
Principle established: An applicant seeking constitutional redress for alleged violations of fundamental rights must show actual or immediately threatened special injury rather than injury common to the general public.
- Steele v Att.-Gen, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 1
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68
Principle established: An applicant seeking constitutional redress for alleged violations of fundamental rights must demonstrate direct, actual, or imminent personal injury distinct from injury common to the general public.
- Wambua v Director of Public Prosecution (Criminal Revision E111 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 2026 (KLR) (17 February 2025) (Ruling)
Kenya · 2025
Principle established: Mandatory minimum sentences for sexual offences may be challenged on constitutional grounds if they prevent the court from considering an applicant's mitigation and individual circumstances.
