
Human rights
Theme. 45 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Alhaji Sam Sumana v Attorney-General & Anor (SC 4 of 2015) [2015] SLSC 1203 (9 September 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to interpret the Constitution regarding the removal and replacement of the Vice-President and the extent of executive power in such matters.
- Alhaji Sam Sumana v Attorney-General Minister of Justice And Another (SC 4 of 2015) [2015] SLSC 1214 (5 May 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: The Supreme Court determines constitutional questions concerning the vacancy of the office of Vice-President and the legality of subsequent appointments by the President.
- Alhaji Samuel S.Sumana v Attorney-General Minister of Justice & Another (SC 14 of 2015) [2015] SLSC 1217 (9 September 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: The Supreme Court's original jurisdiction is invoked to clarify the constitutional provisions governing the office of the Vice-President and the limits of presidential authority.
- Alhaji Samuel S.Sumana v Attorney-General Minister of Justice & Another (SC 6 of 2015) [2015] SLSC 1216 (15 June 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: Constitutional interpretation by the Supreme Court is required to resolve disputes over the tenure of high-ranking executive officers and the procedural requirements for their removal.
- Alhaji Samuel Sam-Sumana v The Attorney-General & Minster of Justice & Others (SC 4 of 2015) [2015] SLSC 1205 (5 May 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: The Supreme Court provides definitive rulings on the interpretation of sections 124 and 127 of the Constitution in matters of national importance involving the executive branch.
- Baby Alieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 26 (29 January 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Baby Alieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2019) [2018] SLCA 1281 (28 January 2018)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2018
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Baby Allieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 8 (29 January 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Bird v Jones
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1845
Principle established: The restraint must be total; blocking one route while leaving another reasonable exit is not imprisonment.
- Foulah v Kolifa Rowala Tribal Auth, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 142
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: A tribal authority violates natural justice when a chief sits as judge in his own cause, and subjecting a person to complete detention without lawful authority constitutes false imprisonment.
- Kamara v Director of Prisons, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 162
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: Courts lack jurisdiction to review the factual grounds upon which the executive exercises statutory discretionary power to detain a person where the statute empowers detention if the authority is subjective satisfied.
- Kamau v Karanja & another (Petition E005 of 2024) [2024] KESC 64 (KLR) (8 November 2024) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: A petition alleging constitutional violations must specifically identify the violated provisions and the limb of the Supreme Court's jurisdiction being invoked to avoid being struck out.
- Kamugisha Bernard v Uganda (Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 0047 of 2019) [2019] UGCA 2025 (18 November 2019)
Uganda · 2019
Principle established: An applicant may be granted bail pending appeal if they demonstrate substantial sureties, a fixed place of abode, and have previously honored bail conditions during trial.
- Leigh v Gladstone
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1909
Principle established: Necessity can justify a trespass done to prevent greater harm.
- Macaulay v Macaulay (DIV C 27 of 1966) [1967] SLSC 1246 (4 January 1967)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1967
Principle established: A plaintiff cannot invoke constitutional redress for fundamental rights violations without alleging facts establishing a direct, special injury distinct from grievances shared in common with the general public.
- Macaulay v Macaulay, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 14
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68
Principle established: A litigant invoking constitutional fundamental rights enforcement must show direct personal injury or immediate threat thereof, rather than an indefinite likelihood of injury shared generally with the public.
- Meering v Grahame-White Aviation Co Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1919
Principle established: Knowledge of the restraint is not required; it goes only to damages (Atkin LJ).
- Murray v Ministry of Defence
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1988
Principle established: A person may be falsely imprisoned while unaware, e.g. while asleep, though damages may then be nominal.
- Nsabimana v S (Miscellaneous Criminal Review 5 of 2023) [2023] MWHC 42 (24 August 2023)
Malawi · 2023
Principle established: The court may review criminal proceedings and order the release of a person who has been detained without being brought before a court of law within the constitutionally mandated period.
- Ochieng v Attorney General (Petition E051 of 2025) [2026] KESC 32 (KLR) (15 May 2026) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2026
Principle established: The state is liable for damages where it is proven that an individual's fundamental rights and freedoms were violated during arrest and subsequent police detention.
- R v Khoviwa (Criminal Case 20 of 2023) [2023] MWHC 116 (20 December 2023)
Malawi · 2023
Principle established: Mandatory death sentences for murder are unconstitutional, and convicts sentenced under such provisions are entitled to a resentencing hearing where the court exercises its discretion.
- R v Lamin, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 346
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: In determining whether a political publication is seditious, the court must construe the work as a whole with due regard for press freedom, rather than focusing solely on objectionable excerpts.
- R v Thifu (Criminal Case 3 of 2023) [2023] MWHC 118 (20 December 2023)
Malawi · 2023
Principle established: Convicts previously sentenced to the mandatory death penalty for murder must be resentenced by a court that has the discretion to consider mitigating and aggravating factors.
- R v Tseka (Criminal Case 5 of 2023) [2023] MWHC 114 (20 December 2023)
Malawi · 2023
Principle established: The unconstitutionality of mandatory death sentences necessitates a judicial review of the sentence to ensure it is proportionate and based on the specific circumstances of the case.
- R v. Lamin & Others (DPP 66 of 1965) [1966] SLSC 7 (21 January 1966)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1966
Principle established: In determining whether a publication is seditious, the court must construe the publication as a whole with due regard for press freedom rather than focusing strictly on isolated objectionable passages.
- Republic v Mwangi; Initiative for Strategic Litigation in Africa (ISLA) & 3 others (Amicus Curiae) (Petition E018 of 2023) [2024] KESC 34 (KLR) (12 July 2024) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: The Court of Appeal's jurisdiction is restricted to appeals from the High Court and designated tribunals, and it cannot determine the constitutionality of a sentence if not raised as an issue.
- S (On Application of Richard Chimwendo Banda) v Director of Public Prosecutions & The Inspector General of the Malawi Police Service (Judicial Review No. 01 of 2026) [2026] MWHC 1 (14 January 2026)
Malawi · 2026
Principle established: Judicial review may be granted to challenge the detention of a person beyond the mandatory statutory remand period, and such permission may serve as interim relief pending a full hearing.
- SKY VRS PARLIAMENT OF GHANA (J1/09/2024) [2024] GHASC 66 (18 December 2024)
Ghana · 2024
Principle established: The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to determine the constitutionality of a Bill passed by Parliament if it is alleged to violate fundamental human rights and freedoms.
- State (on the Application of Major) v Secretary General of Malawi Congress Party (MSCA Civil Application 46 of 2022) [2024] MWSC 10 (14 June 2024)
Malawi · 2024
Principle established: A decision to expel a member from a political party is subject to judicial review if it is alleged that the expulsion occurred without a prior disciplinary hearing.
- Steele & Ors v Attorney-General; Tejan-Sie v Koroma (CIVIL CASE 125 of 1966) [1967] SLSC 1210 (3 January 1967)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1967
Principle established: An applicant seeking constitutional redress for alleged violations of fundamental rights must allege facts demonstrating direct or immediately threatened special injury beyond that suffered generally by the public.
- Steele & Ors v Attorney-General; Tejan-Sie v Koroma (CIVIL CASE 125 of 1966) [1967] SLSC 1245 (3 January 1967)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1967
Principle established: An applicant seeking constitutional redress for alleged violations of fundamental rights must show actual or immediately threatened special injury rather than injury common to the general public.
- Steele v Att.-Gen, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 1
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68
Principle established: An applicant seeking constitutional redress for alleged violations of fundamental rights must demonstrate direct, actual, or imminent personal injury distinct from injury common to the general public.
- Wambua v Director of Public Prosecution (Criminal Revision E111 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 2026 (KLR) (17 February 2025) (Ruling)
Kenya · 2025
Principle established: Mandatory minimum sentences for sexual offences may be challenged on constitutional grounds if they prevent the court from considering an applicant's mitigation and individual circumstances.
- Abraham Lavaly & 9 Others v S (SC 1 of 2017) [2020] SLSC 13 (3 August 2020)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2020
Principle established: Not yet classified
- Abraham Lavaly & Others v S (SC 1 of 2017) [2020] SLSC 12 (3 August 2020)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2020
Principle established: Not yet classified
- Abraham Lavaly And Others v S (SC 1 of 2017) [2020] SLSC 11 (3 August 2020)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2020
Principle established: Not yet classified
- Attorney General v Kabaziguruka (Constitutional Appeal 2 of 2021) [2025] UGSC 1 (31 January 2025)
Uganda · 2025
Principle established: Not yet classified
- Augustine Sorie-Sengbe Marrah v Inspector General of Police (SC APP 8 of 2018) [2022] SLSC 1 (21 April 2022)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2022
Principle established: Not yet classified
- S v Abraham Lavaly & Others (SC 1 of 2017) [2020] SLSC 10 (10 August 2020)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2020
Principle established: Not yet classified
- S v Julius Spencer & Ors (SC MISC APP 6 of 1993) [1994] SLSC 6 (22 June 1994)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1994
Principle established: Not yet classified
