
Separation of powers
Doctrine in Constitutional. 8 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Alhaji Sam Sumana v Attorney-General & Anor (SC 4 of 2015) [2015] SLSC 1203 (9 September 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to interpret the Constitution regarding the removal and replacement of the Vice-President and the extent of executive power in such matters.
- Alhaji Sam Sumana v Attorney-General Minister of Justice And Another (SC 4 of 2015) [2015] SLSC 1214 (5 May 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: The Supreme Court determines constitutional questions concerning the vacancy of the office of Vice-President and the legality of subsequent appointments by the President.
- Alhaji Samuel S.Sumana v Attorney-General Minister of Justice & Another (SC 14 of 2015) [2015] SLSC 1217 (9 September 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: The Supreme Court's original jurisdiction is invoked to clarify the constitutional provisions governing the office of the Vice-President and the limits of presidential authority.
- Alhaji Samuel S.Sumana v Attorney-General Minister of Justice & Another (SC 6 of 2015) [2015] SLSC 1216 (15 June 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: Constitutional interpretation by the Supreme Court is required to resolve disputes over the tenure of high-ranking executive officers and the procedural requirements for their removal.
- Alhaji Samuel Sam-Sumana v The Attorney-General & Minster of Justice & Others (SC 4 of 2015) [2015] SLSC 1205 (5 May 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: The Supreme Court provides definitive rulings on the interpretation of sections 124 and 127 of the Constitution in matters of national importance involving the executive branch.
- Oppong Nkrumah v Chief Justice of Republic Ghana and Attorney-General (J8/283/2026) [2026] GHASC 33 (21 August 2026)
Ghana · 2026
Principle established: Directives for special criminal trials during legal vacations must not result in selective justice or violate the constitutional rights of the parties and legal practitioners involved.
- Republic v Ayako (Petition E002 of 2024) [2025] KESC 20 (KLR) (11 April 2025) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2025
Principle established: The High Court has exclusive original jurisdiction to hear constitutional challenges; an appellate court cannot assume original jurisdiction to determine the constitutionality of a sentence for the first time on appeal.
- Republic v Manyeso (Petition E013 of 2024) [2025] KESC 16 (KLR) (11 April 2025) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2025
Principle established: The power to define the parameters of mandatory sentences rests with Parliament; courts violate the doctrine of separation of powers by substituting mandatory minimum or maximum sentences with alternative terms.
