Please note: Decided in 1919.
Facts
The claimant, suspected of theft, was asked to wait in a room while works police stood outside without his knowledge.
Issue
Must a person know he is confined for ?
Held
He was falsely imprisoned even though he did not know of the restraint.
Principle
Knowledge of the restraint is not required; it goes only to damages (Atkin LJ).
Why it matters
The modern rule on awareness in false imprisonment.
Cited in these chapters
Cite this page
Meering v Grahame-White Aviation Co Ltd (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/meering-v-grahame-white-aviation> accessed 31 October 2026
The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.
This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.