
Trespass to the person
Doctrine in Tort. 27 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Att.-Gen. v Holden, 1957-60 ALR S.L. 20
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1957-60
Principle established: A presiding election officer with a duty to maintain order at a polling station may use necessary force without committing assault to remove a person who refuses to behave.
- Blake v Barnard
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1840
Principle established: On this view an assault needs an apparent present ability to carry out the threat.
- Cockcroft v Smith
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1705
Principle established: A person may use only reasonable force in self-defence.
- Cole v Turner
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1704
Principle established: The slightest contact can be a battery if done with hostility; ordinary social contact is not.
- Cook v Beal
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1697
Principle established: Force used in self-defence must be reasonable and proportionate.
- Edward Walworth Bell & Claude Emile Wright [1921] SLCA 2 (23 January 1921)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1921
Principle established: A military officer acting in aid of civil power may use reasonable force to eject a civilian who attempts to force entry into a military-occupied public building in violation of orders.
- Ford v Skinner
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1830
Principle established: The act comprising a battery must be done without the claimant's consent.
- Hook v Cunard Steamship Co Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1953
Principle established: A captain may use reasonable force or restraint only when he reasonably believes it necessary for safety.
- Kwekumensa v The King
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts
Principle established: Conduct that puts a person in reasonable fear of immediate force is an assault.
- Lane v Holloway
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1968
Principle established: Excessive force is not justified by a minor attack.
- Leigh v Gladstone
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1909
Principle established: Necessity can justify a trespass done to prevent greater harm.
- Livingstone v Ministry of Defence
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1984
Principle established: Intention to apply force to one person can be 'transferred' to the person who is actually hit.
- Meade's and Belt's Case
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1823
Principle established: Threatening words alone were traditionally not an assault without some act.
- Meering v Grahame-White Aviation Co Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1919
Principle established: Knowledge of the restraint is not required; it goes only to damages (Atkin LJ).
- Murray v Ministry of Defence
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1988
Principle established: A person may be falsely imprisoned while unaware, e.g. while asleep, though damages may then be nominal.
- Nash v Sheen
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1953
Principle established: Consent covers only the act actually agreed to; going beyond it is trespass to the person.
- R v Billinghurst
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1978
Principle established: Players consent only to contact within the normal course of the game, not to deliberate foul play beyond what is expected.
- R v St George
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1840
Principle established: Assault turns on the reasonable apprehension of immediate force.
- Robinson v Balmain New Ferry Co Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1910
Principle established: Where a person's liberty is subject to a reasonable condition he has accepted, restraining him until it is met is not false imprisonment.
- Saurosi and Another v S [2025] ZWSC 139 (5 June 2025)
Zimbabwe · 2025
Principle established: In an appeal against sentence, the court will only interfere if the trial court committed a misdirection or if the sentence is so severe as to shock the conscience of the court.
- Scott v Shepherd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1773
Principle established: Involuntary or instinctive acts of third parties do not break the chain of causation.
- Siaka v Sierra Leone Diamond
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts
Principle established: A patient cannot sue for force within the scope of the express or implied consent.
- Siaka v Sierra Leone Diamonds Limited (CIV APP 18 of 1971) [1972] SLCA 1285 (25 May 1972)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1972
Principle established: Volenti non fit injuria applies to bar an action for assault against an employer where an employee voluntarily and knowingly participates in a trial by ordeal outside the course of employment.
- Siaka v Sierra Leone Diamonds Ltd, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 111
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: The doctrine of volenti non fit injuria bars an employee from claiming damages for assault against an employer when the employee voluntarily participated in a trial by ordeal outside employment.
- Stanley v Powell
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1891
Principle established: Inevitable accident is a defence where the harm could not have been avoided by reasonable care.
- Tuberville v Savage
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1669
Principle established: Words can negate what would otherwise be an assault, since they remove the fear of immediate violence.
- Wilson v Pringle
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1987
Principle established: Unless it is obvious from the act itself, the claimant must show that the touching was hostile.
