
Shipping & Transport
Area of law. 24 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Air Cote d ivoire v Ibeachusi Okechukwu (CIV APP 89 of 2017) [2018] SLCA 1280 (22 November 2018)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2018
Principle established: Summary judgment should not be granted where there are triable issues of fact, such as whether a third party interfered with luggage under international aviation conventions.
- Bia v Murray, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 369
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: A sea carrier's liability for carriage of goods terminates upon proper unloading and delivery onto the quay in accordance with port custom.
- Bia v. Murray (CIV APP 11 of 1954) [1954] SLCA 2 (12 April 1954)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1954
Principle established: A carrier's responsibility for goods ends upon valid delivery according to the custom of the port of discharge, after which it holds the goods merely as an agent.
- C.F.A.O. v Rochette, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 6
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: A judgment on a special case stated does not preclude an appeal, and carriers are liable for cargo loss caused by dangerously overloading a vessel.
- Commissioner of Police v Quinci25 Battitsta (MAG APP 45 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 35 (25 November 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: Under section 6(2) of the Fisheries Act, a licensing officer has the statutory power to impose conditions that restrict a licensee's right of navigation.
- Commr. of Police v Montuse, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 45
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: An appellate court will rarely disturb a trial judge's findings on verbal testimony unless clear material inconsistencies or oversight of crucial circumstances are demonstrated.
- Compagnie Francaise De L'Afrique Occidentale v Rochette (1 of 1922) [1922] SLCA 14 (14 February 1922)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1922
Principle established: A carrier is liable for loss of goods caused by overloading a canoe, and a local custom permitting such dangerous overloading is legally unsupportable.
- Hook v Cunard Steamship Co Ltd
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1953
Principle established: A captain may use reasonable force or restraint only when he reasonably believes it necessary for safety.
- Shaheen v Duralia (2 of 1920) [1920] SLCA 4 (23 January 1920)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1920
Principle established: A local custom permitting a native carrier to take other cargo when a non-native hirer contracts for exclusive use is unenforceable as contrary to natural justice, equity and good conscience.
- Shaheen v Duralia, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 3
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: Local customs permitting carriers to take extra cargo despite a contract for exclusive use are repugnant to natural justice and equity, and thus unenforceable.
- Solomon Shaheen v Kelfallah Duralia [1921] SLCA 4 (24 January 1921)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1921
Principle established: A local custom allowing a canoe owner who lets a vessel for exclusive use to place additional loads and passengers inside is legally unsupportable under ordinance provisions.
- The Oropesa
Lanbuk on the Law of Torts · 1943
Principle established: To break the chain, an intervening act must be something unwarrantable, a new cause, extraneous or extrinsic (Lord Wright).
- Webber v Sierra Leone Ry, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 132
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: Owner's risk clauses exempting carriers from liability in exchange for reduced rates are enforceable if consignors are offered a reasonable alternative at standard carrier's risk rates.
- A.P Moller v Hadson Taylor & Co (CIV APP 10 of 1988) [1991] SLCA 3 (4 July 1991)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1991
Principle established: Not yet classified
- Alie Abess v Sierra Leone Road Transport Authority (CIV APP 53 of 2016) [2022] SLCA 14 (16 January 2022)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2022
Principle established: Not yet classified
- Idrissa Conteh v Abdul J. Kamara (SC CIV APP 2 of 1979) [1980] SLSC 4 (1 May 1980)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1980
Principle established: Not yet classified
- Moller v Hadson-Taylor (CivApp 10/1988) [1991] SLCA 2 (4 July 1991)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1991
Principle established: Not yet classified
- Owners MV Mascho Star v Richab S.A. and Anor (CIV APP 6 of 2000) [2009] SLSC 3 (3 March 2009)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2009
Principle established: Not yet classified
- Peninsula Fishing Agency Ltd v Owners & Persons interested in the vessel And Another (CIV APP 20 of 2020) [2020] SLCA 24 (25 August 2020)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2020
Principle established: Not yet classified
- Sierra Leone Shipping Company Ltd v Hussein Hamoud (CIV APP 43 of 2006) [2008] SLCA 56 (3 June 2008)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2008
Principle established: Not yet classified
- Staco Insurance Company v Sea Coach Boat Company Ltd (CIV APP 30/2019) [2026] SLCA 2 (3 June 2026)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2026
Principle established: Not yet classified
- The Attorney-General & Minister of Justice v Horse Fishing Company Ltd (SC CIV 3 of 2018) [2021] SLSC 34 (13 January 2021)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2021
Principle established: Not yet classified
- The Owners of the Ship v Richab S.A & Anor (SC CIV APP 5 of 2000) [2005] SLSC 8 (1 June 2005)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2005
Principle established: Not yet classified
- The Owners of the Ship v Richab S.A & ANOR (SC CIV APP 5 of 2005) [2005] SLSC 7 (1 June 2005)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2005
Principle established: Not yet classified
