Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Livingstone v Ministry of Defence

1984

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts

A soldier fired a baton round at one person during a disturbance in Northern Ireland, but it struck the claimant instead.

Issue

Is there a when force aimed at one person strikes another?

Held

It was a battery against the person actually struck.

Principle

Intention to apply force to one person can be 'transferred' to the person who is actually hit.

Why it matters

Shows that battery does not require the claimant to be the intended target.

Cited in these chapters

Cite this page

Livingstone v Ministry of Defence (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/livingstone-v-ministry-of-defence> accessed 31 October 2026

The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.

This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.