Skip to content

Locus standi

Doctrine in Civil Procedure. 15 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.

  • Admor.-Gen. v Wilson, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 79

    Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73

    Principle established: The Administrator-General must obtain letters of administration before commencing a declaratory action in respect of property devolving upon him at the death of an intestate.

  • Collier v Williams (CIV APP 25 of 1966) [1967] SLCA 1246 (10 July 1967)

    Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1967

    Principle established: Because trespass to land is an actionable wrong against possession, only the person in actual or constructive possession at the time of the entry can maintain the action.

  • Collier v Williams, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 197

    Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68

    Principle established: Because trespass to land constitutes an injury to a possessory right, the proper party to institute an action is the person who held actual or constructive possession at the time.

  • Democratic Progressive Party v Malawi Electoral Commission (Civil Cause 127 of 2024) [2024] MWHC 51 (9 October 2024)

    Malawi · 2024

    Principle established: Courts possess inherent jurisdiction to protect their procedures against abuse and may reject claims that fail to supply necessary facts or legal basis for the alleged violation of rights.

  • Jalloh v Conteh, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 203

    Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73

    Principle established: Under the Fatal Accidents Acts, if a personal representative fails to sue within six months of the deceased's death, an action may be maintained by any person entitled to benefit from the estate.

  • Kallon & Another v. Stevens & Others (CC 389 of 1965) [1966] SLSC 1 (4 January 1966)

    Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1966

    Principle established: A plaintiff seeking a declaratory judgment must possess a real interest in the ruling; the Attorney-General is a necessary party to enforce public rights unless private rights are violated or special damage is suffered.

  • Kallon v Stevens, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 300

    Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66

    Principle established: A minister exercising supervisory statutory authority over a municipal council has sufficient real interest to maintain a declaratory action challenging the validity of a mayoral election without joining the Attorney-General.

  • Koroma v Mayor of Freetown, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 100

    Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66

    Principle established: An elected representative on a local government body has sufficient substantial interest to maintain declaratory proceedings challenging subordinate legislation affecting that body without joining the Attorney-General or showing special damage.

  • Macaulay v Macaulay (DIV C 27 of 1966) [1967] SLSC 1246 (4 January 1967)

    Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1967

    Principle established: A plaintiff cannot invoke constitutional redress for fundamental rights violations without alleging facts establishing a direct, special injury distinct from grievances shared in common with the general public.

  • Macaulay v Macaulay, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 14

    Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68

    Principle established: A litigant invoking constitutional fundamental rights enforcement must show direct personal injury or immediate threat thereof, rather than an indefinite likelihood of injury shared generally with the public.

  • Smith v Walker, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 326

    Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66

    Principle established: Any individual beneficiary under a trust may sue personally to challenge the validity of a trustee's breach of trust without bringing the action in a representative capacity.

  • Smith v. Walker & Another (CC 176 of 1964) [1966] SLSC 3 (7 January 1966)

    Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1966

    Principle established: A beneficiary of a trust can sue in his personal capacity to challenge the validity of a trustee's breach of trust without needing to represent other beneficiaries.

  • Steele & Ors v Attorney-General; Tejan-Sie v Koroma (CIVIL CASE 125 of 1966) [1967] SLSC 1210 (3 January 1967)

    Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1967

    Principle established: An applicant seeking constitutional redress for alleged violations of fundamental rights must allege facts demonstrating direct or immediately threatened special injury beyond that suffered generally by the public.

  • Steele & Ors v Attorney-General; Tejan-Sie v Koroma (CIVIL CASE 125 of 1966) [1967] SLSC 1245 (3 January 1967)

    Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1967

    Principle established: An applicant seeking constitutional redress for alleged violations of fundamental rights must show actual or immediately threatened special injury rather than injury common to the general public.

  • Steele v Att.-Gen, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 1

    Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68

    Principle established: An applicant seeking constitutional redress for alleged violations of fundamental rights must demonstrate direct, actual, or imminent personal injury distinct from injury common to the general public.