
Provocation
Doctrine in Criminal. 22 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Amara Koiju v R (17 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1235 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: A judge is not bound to put manslaughter to assessors where the evidence does not support it, and the mere withdrawal of affection does not constitute legal provocation.
- Amara Koiju v R (CR APP 17 of 1963) [2020] SLCA 13 (12 August 2020)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2020
Principle established: A trial judge is not bound to put manslaughter to assessors absent evidence legally amounting to provocation, and a partner withdrawing affection does not constitute legal provocation.
- Amara Koiju v Regina (CR APP 17 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1241 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: A judge need not direct assessors on manslaughter where there is no evidence to support it, and the withdrawal of romantic affection does not amount to provocation in law.
- Amara Koiju v Regina (CR APP 17 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 1 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A trial judge need not leave manslaughter to assessors absent evidence supporting it, and the withdrawal of affection does not constitute legal provocation.
- Baby Alieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 26 (29 January 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Baby Alieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2019) [2018] SLCA 1281 (28 January 2018)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2018
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Baby Allieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 8 (29 January 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Gbenyeh v S (CR APP 5 of 1975) [1976] SLCA 5 (14 October 1976)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1976
Principle established: An appellate court will not overturn a conviction due to a misdirection on provocation if it is satisfied that the jury would inevitably have reached the same verdict upon proper direction.
- Gbenyeh v S (Criminal Appeal 5 of 1975) [1976] SLSC 10 (14 October 1976)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1976
Principle established: An appellate court will not overturn a conviction due to a misdirection on provocation if it is satisfied that the jury would inevitably have reached the same verdict upon proper direction.
- Genet & Another v. R (10 of 1964) [1964] SLCA 7 (31 March 1964)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1964
Principle established: Where provocation reduces murder to manslaughter, a third party cannot be convicted of aiding and abetting the resulting homicide.
- Genet v R, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 36
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: Where the defence of provocation reduces a killing from murder to manslaughter, a third party cannot be convicted of aiding and abetting the provoked crime.
- Morie Gbenie & Regina (CR APP 2 of 1963; CR APP 3 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1225 (27 February 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: In a murder trial with evidence of provocation, a judge must direct assessors on whether the defendant had sufficient time for cooling.
- Morie Gbenie v Regina (CR APP 2 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1253 (27 February 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: In a murder trial with evidence of provocation, a judge must direct assessors on whether the defendant had sufficient time for cooling.
- Regina & Mohammed Conteh (CR APP 29 of 1962) [1963] SLCA 1226 (27 February 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: When a person in loco parentis causes death during correction, failure of the judge to instruct the assessors on the law of killing by correction constitutes reversible error.
- Regina v Abu Bangura (CR APP 11 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 37 (26 July 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: Where evidence reveals provocation, a conviction for murder must be quashed and substituted with manslaughter.
- Regina v Abu Bangura (CR APP 11 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 7 (26 July 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: Evidence of sudden provocation reduces a murder conviction to manslaughter.
- Regina v Mohamed Conteh (CR APP 29 of 1962) [1963] SLCA 1254 (27 February 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: When a person in loco parentis causes death during correction, failure of the judge to instruct the assessors on the law of killing by correction constitutes reversible error.
- S v Chikanya (251 of 2022) [2022] ZWHHC 251 (1 April 2022)
Zimbabwe · 2022
Principle established: A person who kills another during a violent assault with dangerous objects may be convicted of murder if they intended death or realized a real risk of death.
- S v Jose (243 of 2022) [2022] ZWHHC 243 (28 March 2022)
Zimbabwe · 2022
Principle established: To succeed on a plea of self-defence, the accused must show they used reasonable force to avert an unlawful attack, while provocation may mitigate murder to a lesser offence.
- Vandi Johnson v S (CR APP 10 of 2004) [2008] SLCA 53 (13 April 2008)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2008
Principle established: A murder conviction must be reduced to manslaughter where the trial judge errs by failing to put the defence of provocation fairly to the jury despite evidence of an assault by multiple persons.
- Youma v R, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 71
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: Only where a husband finds his wife in the act of committing adultery and in the heat of the moment kills the adulterer is there sufficient provocation to reduce murder to manslaughter.
- Youma v Regem (WACA CR APP 9 of 1950) [1950] SLCA 3 (27 November 1950)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1950
Principle established: Only witnessing an act of adultery and killing in the immediate heat of the moment constitutes sufficient provocation to reduce murder to manslaughter.
