
Self-defence
Doctrine in Criminal. 8 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Baby Alieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 26 (29 January 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Baby Alieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2019) [2018] SLCA 1281 (28 January 2018)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2018
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Baby Allieu v S (CR APP 12 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 8 (29 January 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court examined grounds of appeal involving the failure to record a summing-up, misdirection on self-defence and provocation, and the constitutionality of the mandatory death sentence for murder.
- Demby v S (CR APP 25 of 1975) [1978] SLCA 1 (19 December 1978)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1978
Principle established: It is a fatal misdirection for a trial judge to direct a jury on self-defence when the accused does not admit the act or rely on that defence.
- Demby v S (Criminal Appeal 25 of 1975) [1978] SLSC 4 (19 December 1978)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1978
Principle established: It is a fatal misdirection for a trial judge to direct a jury on self-defence when the accused does not admit the act or rely on that defence.
- R v Vandy Koroma (CR APP 51 of 1960) [1961] SLSC 25 (30 March 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: Where there is evidence that the accused acted in self-defence, the trial judge is legally bound to submit the issue of self-defence to the assessors.
- Regina v Vandy Koroma (51 of 1960) [1961] SLCA 26 (30 March 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: The trial judge is legally bound to leave the issue of self-defence to the assessors if there is any evidence supporting that defence.
- S v Jose (243 of 2022) [2022] ZWHHC 243 (28 March 2022)
Zimbabwe · 2022
Principle established: To succeed on a plea of self-defence, the accused must show they used reasonable force to avert an unlawful attack, while provocation may mitigate murder to a lesser offence.
