
Evidence
Area of law. 143 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Aiah Momoh v Sahr S. Nyandemoh (CIV APP 70 of 2017) [2023] SLCA 7 (20 July 2023)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2023
Principle established: Findings of fact by a trial judge, particularly regarding the source of funds for property acquisition and the credibility of witnesses, will generally be upheld unless shown to be clearly erroneous.
- Alhadi v Allie (19 of 1951) [1951] SLCA 3 (14 December 1951)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1951
Principle established: In malicious prosecution, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving absence of reasonable and probable cause, and malice is necessarily inferred when the prosecutor knowingly suborns perjured evidence.
- Alhadi v Allie, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 147
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: In malicious prosecution, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving absence of reasonable and probable cause, and malice is necessarily inferred when the prosecutor knowingly suborns perjured evidence.
- Asante v S (J8A/09/2025) [2025] GHASC 41 (12 June 2025)
Ghana · 2025
Principle established: New evidence will not be allowed on appeal unless the court is satisfied that, with due diligence, the evidence was not available to the party during the original trial.
- Bah v S (CR APP 1 of 2012) [2015] SLCA 4 (23 June 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: An application for bail pending appeal may be considered by the Court of Appeal following a conviction for receiving stolen goods, often supported by medical or legal grounds.
- Barrie & Anor v S (CR APP 8 of 1974) [1976] SLCA 2 (11 March 1976)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1976
Principle established: The wrongful admission of prejudicial evidence will lead to the quashing of a conviction unless the appellate court is certain the jury would inevitably have reached the same verdict without it.
- Barrie & ANOR v S (Criminal Appeal 8 of 1974) [1976] SLSC 8 (11 March 1976)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1976
Principle established: The wrongful admission of prejudicial evidence will lead to the quashing of a conviction unless the appellate court is certain the jury would inevitably have reached the same verdict without it.
- Basma & Macauley v Attorney-General & Minister of Justice (CIV APP 7 of 2020) [2021] SLCA 28 (31 May 2021)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2021
Principle established: An appellate court may allow the introduction of new evidence if it is relevant, credible, and could not have been reasonably obtained during the original proceedings.
- Beckley v Sierra Leone Brewery Ltd, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 1
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: In a negligence claim against a manufacturer, the burden of proof is not discharged if the evidence shows the injury was equally consistent with causes other than the defendant's negligence.
- Bedevia Scoti & Ors & Samuel Banjoko Jolly (CIV APP 18 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1221 (11 December 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: A vendor of real property who subsequently remains in occupation as a tenant of the purchaser is estopped from disputing the validity of the sale.
- Benedevia Scott & Others v Samuel B. Jolly (CIV APP 18 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1247 (11 December 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: A vendor who sells property and remains in possession as a paying tenant of the buyer is estopped from denying the validity of the conveyance.
- Bright v Roberts, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 156
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: A statutory declaration of title is not registrable as an instrument under the Registration of Instruments Act and cannot be admitted where the law requires an oath, affirmation, or affidavit.
- Bright v. Roberts (CIV APP 5 of 1964) [1964] SLCA 11 (26 October 1964)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1964
Principle established: A statutory declaration cannot be used as evidence where the law otherwise requires an oath, affirmation, or affidavit.
- Bull v Kalil, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 132
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: Under the doctrine of res judicata, parties are estopped from litigating not only points decided previously but every point properly belonging to the subject of litigation which could have been brought forward.
- Carew v Carew & Another (1 of 1934) [1934] SLCA 1 (10 October 1934)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1934
Principle established: A lost will may be proved by parol evidence alone, but the court must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt of its due execution, existence, and contents.
- Carew v Carew, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 367
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: A lost will may be proved by parol evidence alone, but the court must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt as to its due execution, existence, and precise contents.
- Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1946] EWHC KB 1 (18 July 1946)
United Kingdom · 1946
Principle established: A promise intended to be binding and acted upon is enforceable even without consideration, preventing the promisor from acting inconsistently with that promise.
- Cole v Cummings (No. 2), 1964-66 ALR S.L. 164
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: A declaratory judgment on land ownership may be granted for a portion of claimed land and should incorporate a survey plan, which is admissible even if not specifically pleaded.
- Conteh v Kamara (MAG APP 21 of 1966) [1967] SLSC 1214 (15 February 1967)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1967
Principle established: Where the official decree book cannot be traced on appeal, secondary parol evidence of an administrative boundary decision is admissible in local court proceedings.
- Conteh v Kamara, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 53
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68
Principle established: Secondary parol evidence of a district boundary decision is admissible in local courts where the primary decree book cannot be traced upon inquiry by the appellate court.
- Daimba Allie v Attorney-General (MAG APP 51 of 1960) [1961] SLSC 17 (24 January 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: The burden of proof in criminal cases rests solely on the prosecution, and any shifting of the burden to the accused to establish innocence vitiates a conviction.
- Davies v Davies (25 of 1963) [1964] SLSC 12 (24 July 1964)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1964
Principle established: Judicial notice may be taken of the mental state of a pregnant woman threatened with violence, and medical evidence is highly desirable in divorce suits based on cruelty.
- Divin Koroma & 2 Others v Regina (CRI APP 22 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 57 (16 November 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: A conviction cannot stand where it is founded solely on an accused person's statement that simultaneously incriminates the accused and denies guilt.
- Divin Koroma, Foday Bangurah & Thomas Fillie & Regina (CR APP 21 of 1962; CR APP 22 of 1962; CR APP 23 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 14 (16 November 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: A criminal conviction must be set aside where it is based on a statement by the accused that equally incriminates and exculpates him.
- Dr Joseph Foday Bangura v Ephraim Christian Thompson (CIV APP 21 of 2009) [2015] SLCA 1121 (8 October 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: A claim for recovery of land may be defeated by the doctrine of adverse possession if the claimant's action is found to be statute-barred under limitation laws.
- England & Others v. Official Administrator & Others (CC 520 of 1959) [1966] SLSC 2 (5 January 1966)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1966
Principle established: Recovery of possession of land may be granted under a claim for further and better relief in a title action, and a prior trespass judgment where ownership was not in controversy does not estop.
- England v Official Administrator, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 315
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: A judgment in a trespass action where ownership was not in controversy cannot sustain a plea of res judicata against a subsequent action for declaration of title to the land.
- Estate, Khalilu Jabbie v Skye Bank (SL) Ltd & Anor (MISC APP 45 of 2014) [2016] SLCA 1152 (9 December 2016)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2016
Principle established: The right to cross-examine a deponent on their affidavit is an incidental of the rule of natural justice, allowing parties to test the evidence presented in support of an application.
- Fofanah v S (Criminal Appeal 15 of 1975) [1975] SLSC 6 (23 March 1975)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1975
Principle established: Where evidence in a larceny trial is conflicting and complex, the trial judge must provide adequate guidance in summing up, failure of which renders a guilty verdict unsafe.
- Fornah & 14 Others v S (CR APP 31 of 1975) [1975] SLCA 2 (30 April 1975)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1975
Principle established: A conviction for larceny will be quashed where the trial judge fails to guide the jury on conflicting and complex evidence during the summing up.
- Frederick B. Williams v Virginia Williams & Anor (DIV C 13 of 1960) [1961] SLSC 12 (13 August 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: Adultery in divorce proceedings requires strict proof beyond reasonable doubt, and prior condonation of cruelty is revived and cancelled by subsequent acts of cruelty.
- Frederick B. Williams v Virginia Williams & Anor (DIV C 13 of 1960) [1961] SLSC 9 (18 August 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: Adultery must be proved beyond reasonable doubt under the criminal standard of proof, and condonation of marital cruelty is cancelled by subsequent acts of cruelty.
- Freedom Limited v Mbarak (Petition (Application) E009 of 2024) [2024] KESC 76 (KLR) (13 December 2024) (Ruling)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: Leave to adduce additional evidence in the Supreme Court is governed by specific statutory and rule-based criteria to ensure the evidence is necessary for a just determination.
- George v George and Lewis (SC 34 of 1968) [1970] SLSC 5 (21 January 1970)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1970
Principle established: Adultery in divorce proceedings requires strict proof above the ordinary civil standard, and the presumption of legitimacy is rebuttable by evidence of long separation between the spouses.
- George v George, 1970-71 ALR S.L. 1
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1970-71
Principle established: In a divorce suit, adultery requires strict proof beyond the standard usually applicable in civil proceedings, and the presumption of a child's legitimacy is rebutted by proof of prolonged separation.
- Greene v New India Assur. Co. Ltd, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 303
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: An insurer that conducts the legal defence of an insured without repudiating liability is estopped from subsequently denying its obligation to indemnify.
- Greene v New India Assurance Company Limited (CIV APP 15 of 1971) [1973] SLCA 5 (27 April 1973)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1973
Principle established: An insurer that assumes and conducts the defence of an insured without repudiating the claim is estopped from subsequently denying its liability to indemnify the insured.
- Hall v R, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 189
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: Criminal negligence grounding a conviction for manslaughter requires a gross disregard for human life and safety amounting to a crime against the state.
- Hall v R, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 189 (variant 2)
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: Criminal negligence sufficient to support a conviction for manslaughter requires conduct going beyond mere civil compensation and showing a reckless disregard for the life and safety of others.
- Hall v. R (38 of 1964) [1964] SLCA 17 (24 November 1964)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1964
Principle established: Criminal negligence supporting manslaughter requires a gross disregard for the safety of others amounting to a crime against the state.
