
Admissibility
Doctrine in Evidence. 14 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Asante v S (J8A/09/2025) [2025] GHASC 41 (12 June 2025)
Ghana · 2025
Principle established: New evidence will not be allowed on appeal unless the court is satisfied that, with due diligence, the evidence was not available to the party during the original trial.
- Basma & Macauley v Attorney-General & Minister of Justice (CIV APP 7 of 2020) [2021] SLCA 28 (31 May 2021)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2021
Principle established: An appellate court may allow the introduction of new evidence if it is relevant, credible, and could not have been reasonably obtained during the original proceedings.
- Bright v Roberts, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 156
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: A statutory declaration of title is not registrable as an instrument under the Registration of Instruments Act and cannot be admitted where the law requires an oath, affirmation, or affidavit.
- Estate, Khalilu Jabbie v Skye Bank (SL) Ltd & Anor (MISC APP 45 of 2014) [2016] SLCA 1152 (9 December 2016)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2016
Principle established: The right to cross-examine a deponent on their affidavit is an incidental of the rule of natural justice, allowing parties to test the evidence presented in support of an application.
- Kamande v Republic (Petition (Application) E032 of 2023) [2024] KESC 33 (KLR) (5 July 2024) (Ruling)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: Additional evidence will not be admitted in the Supreme Court if it was within the knowledge of and available to the parties at the time of the original trial.
- Kamara (or Susu) v Reginam (WACA CR APP 72 of 1953) [1953] SLCA 1 (24 April 1953)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1953
Principle established: In a homicide trial, dying declarations and spontaneous statements made during the commission of the crime forming part of the res gestae are admissible to identify the offender and prove cause of death.
- Kamara v R, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 109
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68
Principle established: A confession made by one accused is admissible evidence only against himself and cannot be used by the jury against a co-accused.
- Kamara v Reginam (CR APP 34 of 1966) [1967] SLCA 1233 (21 April 1967)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1967
Principle established: A confession or extra-judicial statement made by one accused is admissible only against its maker and must not be used as evidence against a co-accused.
- Milicent L. Ojumu v General Legal Council & Anor (2) (CIV APP 46 of 2012) [2017] SLCA 1144 (29 March 2017)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2017
Principle established: The rule against hearsay applies to internet evidence and documents, requiring an analysis of authenticity and whether the statement is offered to prove the truth of its contents.
- Moses Kabareebe v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 2023) [2025] UGSC 24 (8 July 2025)
Uganda · 2025
Principle established: In a criminal appeal, the court must evaluate whether procedural irregularities in the investigation or the exclusion of relevant evidence, such as phone records, affected the safety of the conviction.
- Sesay & Kamara v S (SC CRIM APP 7 of 1982) [1984] SLSC 6 (12 December 1984)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1984
Principle established: A trial judge must conduct a voir dire to establish voluntariness when a statement's admissibility is challenged, and statutory language providing that an offender 'shall be liable' confers discretionary rather than mandatory sentencing power.
- Thomas Godwin v R (CR APP 3 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 9 (3 July 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: A criminal conviction must be quashed where a deposition was wrongfully admitted into evidence and it is uncertain whether the defendant would have been convicted without it.
- Unisa Bangura v Peter B.Bangura (CIV APP 56 of 2008) [2019] SLCA 16 (13 March 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court considered the correct application of equitable rules to land re-surveys and the admissibility of additional evidence in the form of receipts during an appeal.
- Unisa Bangura v Peter Bai Bangura (CIV APP 56 of 2008) [2019] SLCA 13 (13 March 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court considered the correct application of equitable rules to land re-surveys and the admissibility of additional evidence in the form of receipts during an appeal.
