
Hearsay
Doctrine in Evidence. 3 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- James Grant & Ors v R (CR APP 20 of 1961; CR APP 22 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 19 (6 November 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: An out-of-court statement by one accused implicating a co-accused is not evidence against that co-accused, and failure so to direct the jury vitiates that co-accused's conviction.
- Milicent L. Ojumu v General Legal Council & Anor (2) (CIV APP 46 of 2012) [2017] SLCA 1144 (29 March 2017)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2017
Principle established: The rule against hearsay applies to internet evidence and documents, requiring an analysis of authenticity and whether the statement is offered to prove the truth of its contents.
- Pa Sheka Kanu & Ors v Sulay Seisay (CIV APP 43 of 1960) [1961] SLCA 15 (21 July 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: A candidate's genealogical descent required for paramount chieftaincy cannot be established by insufficient and uncorroborated hearsay evidence.
