
Robbery
Doctrine in Criminal. 8 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Chikiwa v State (30 of 2024) [2024] ZWSC 30 (30 January 2024)
Zimbabwe · 2024
Principle established: An appellate court may set aside a conviction and sentence for unlawful entry while upholding a conviction for murder based on the specific evidence presented for each count.
- Kaberia (Criminal Appeal 68 of 2019) [2024] KECA 1128 (KLR) (6 September 2024) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: In cases of robbery with violence and gang rape, the court must evaluate the evidence of identification and the use of dangerous weapons to sustain a conviction.
- Kamara & 3 Others v S (CR APP 8 of 2010) [2012] SLCA 23 (29 November 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: Convictions for robbery with aggravation and wounding with intent may be appealed to the Court of Appeal to challenge the findings of the trial court.
- Kulaishi v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 187 of 2024) [2024] UGCA 181 (17 July 2024)
Uganda · 2024
Principle established: The court may impose consecutive sentences for distinct offences like rape and aggravated robbery, provided the total sentence is proportionate to the gravity of the crimes.
- Lenkilili v Republic (Criminal Application E016 of 2024) [2024] KECA 926 (KLR) (26 July 2024) (Ruling)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: Lack of finances to secure an advocate may be considered as a ground for enlargement of time to file a notice of appeal against a heavy criminal sentence.
- Sesay & Kamara v S (SC CRIM APP 7 of 1982) [1984] SLSC 6 (12 December 1984)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1984
Principle established: A trial judge must conduct a voir dire to establish voluntariness when a statement's admissibility is challenged, and statutory language providing that an offender 'shall be liable' confers discretionary rather than mandatory sentencing power.
- Wanga v Republic (Petition E030 of 2023) [2024] KESC 38 (KLR) (2 August 2024) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: Litigants appealing to the Supreme Court must strictly categorize their case under the distinct constitutional or legal categories of appellate jurisdiction to satisfy the court that the appeal is properly lodged.
- Wetsenge Robert v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 80 of 2021) [2025] UGSC 51 (30 October 2025)
Uganda · 2025
Principle established: A sentence may be challenged as illegal or manifestly harsh if the court fails to account for the period spent on remand or other relevant mitigating factors.
