
Jurisdiction
Doctrine in Civil Procedure. 60 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Abdulai Moijueh & 2 Others v Abu Smart (CIV APP 1 of 2011) [2015] SLCA 1133 (12 March 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: A High Court judge may err in law by ordering the transfer of a matter pending in a District Appeals Court to the High Court without proper statutory authority.
- Abdulai Moijueh & ORS V Abu Smart (CIV 1 of 2011) [2015] SLCA 1123 (12 March 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: The misapplication of statutory provisions regarding the transfer of cases between different levels of the court system constitutes a ground for setting aside a judicial order.
- Abubakarr K.Bangura v Isata B.Kamara (MISC APP 23 of 2023) [2024] SLCA 1 (13 February 2024)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2024
Principle established: Applications for enlargement of time must generally be made in the High Court first; the Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to hear such applications unless they were first refused below.
- Aiah Fengai & 73 Others & Marginalised Affected Property Owners v Octea Limited (CIV APP 73 of 2023) [2024] SLCA 3 (29 February 2024)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2024
Principle established: Whether a decision striking out a writ for lack of jurisdiction is interlocutory or final determines the procedure for seeking leave to appeal.
- Aiah Fengai & ORS v Octea Ltd (CivAPP 73/23) [2024] SLCA 2 (29 February 2024)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2024
Principle established: A court may grant leave to appeal against a decision striking out consolidated writs if it determines the decision was interlocutory rather than final.
- Alpha Kamara v S.A.T Koroma (MAG APP 53 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 38 (30 September 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A magistrate cannot refuse to commit an accused for trial without considering the whole of the evidence, and any person may lay an information for a public offence absent limiting statutory provisions.
- Aluochier v Likowa & 2 others (Petition (Application) E008 of 2024) [2024] KESC 12 (KLR) (26 April 2024) (Ruling)
Kenya · 2024
Principle established: The Supreme Court may consider applications for the adoption of a consent between parties, though repeated failed applications may indicate a failure to resolve the underlying dispute.
- Aluochier v Senate & 2 others (Petition E014 of 2025) [2025] KESC 59 (KLR) (3 October 2025) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2025
Principle established: The Chief Justice, as head of the Judiciary, has the authority to issue administrative circulars regarding the waiver or exemption of court fees for State organs and agencies.
- Asiegbu v Asiegbu, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 270
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: The court has jurisdiction to grant a divorce decree on the cross-petition of a non-domiciled husband where the wife has resided within the jurisdiction for three years prior to filing.
- Attorney-General v Baimba Limba (CR APP 15 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1217 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: A magistrate acquiring jurisdiction to try an indictable charge summarily under section 18 of the Summary Conviction Offences Act must show on the record consideration of circumstances and expediency.
- Attorney-General v Baimba Limba (CR APP 15 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1243 (12 August 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: To acquire summary jurisdiction under section 18 of the Summary Conviction Offences Act without a preliminary inquiry, the record must reflect that the magistrate considered it expedient having regard to the circumstances.
- Borbor Fefegula-Kamba v Margaret G. Baio-Gbanie (CIV APP 44 of 2016) [2019] SLCA 4 (16 October 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: An election petition must be filed within the strict statutory time limits, and jurisdictional objections regarding the timing of the filing should be determined before proceeding to other applications.
- C. J. W. Rollings v Ezekiel Lewis (26 of 1960) [1962] SLCA 19 (9 March 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: A magistrate cannot review or vary a final judgment once determined, and liberty to apply cannot be used to substantive vary rights decided in a final order.
- C.J. W. Rollings v Ezekiel Lewis (MAG APP 26 of 1960) [1962] SLCA 46 (9 March 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: A magistrate has no power to review or substantively alter a final decision after the case has been determined, and should not insert 'liberty to apply' to vary finalized liability.
- Chang Young Chi & 10 ORS v Inspector General of Police (SC CR APP 1 of 2010) [2018] SLSC 8 (25 March 2018)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2018
Principle established: The court considered whether an application for stay of execution of a magistrate's judgment could be entertained when the underlying judgment was not currently on appeal.
- Chang Young Chi & Others v The Inspector General of Police (SC CR APP 1 of 2010) [2018] SLSC 6 (20 March 2018)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2018
Principle established: The court considered whether an application for stay of execution of a magistrate's judgment could be entertained when the underlying judgment was not currently on appeal.
- Chang Young v The Inspector General of Police (SC CR APP 1 of 2010) [2018] SLSC 4 (6 March 2018)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2018
Principle established: The court may summon respondents to assist with discovery in aid of execution to enforce a previously delivered judgment.
- Coker v Coker, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 130
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: Failure to comply with a fundamental statutory condition precedent to an appeal deprives the court of jurisdiction, rendering the proceedings a nullity which may be set aside ex debito justitiae.
- Commissioner of Police v Janneh, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 205
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: A person arrested for an offence and brought before a magistrate's court may lawfully be tried on a charge for a different offence.
- Commissioner of Police v. Janneh & Others (40 of 1964) [1965] SLCA 1 (8 March 1965)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1965
Principle established: A person arrested for one offence may lawfully be tried before a magistrate's court upon a charge for a different offence.
- Conteh v Yayah & Another (CIV APP 36 of 1972) [1973] SLCA 4 (13 April 1973)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1973
Principle established: Under the Workmen's Compensation Act, magistrates' courts have jurisdiction to entertain claims of any amount, but the court's power to award compensation is strictly limited to the statutory maximum.
- Conteh v Yayah, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 296
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: Magistrates' courts have jurisdiction to hear workmen's compensation claims of any size, but their statutory power to award compensation is restricted to the prescribed monetary limit.
- Dr. Momodu Yilla V Augustine A . Luseni (CIV APP 24 of 2013) [2014] SLCA 3 (24 April 2014)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2014
Principle established: In appeals involving questions of customary law, the High Court (Local Appeals Division) must sit with the aid of two assessors as required by the Local Courts Act.
- Fargo Ltd v Lilongwe university of Agriculture & Natural Resources (46 of 2024) [2024] MWHC 56 (16 October 2024)
Malawi · 2024
Principle established: Once a matter is referred to arbitration pursuant to an agreement, the court cedes jurisdiction and cannot continue to exercise authority over the dispute.
- Francis F. Koroma v Hon Kusan Sesay & 3 Others (EP CIV APP 52 of 2018) [2019] SLCA 30 (10 April 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court addressed preliminary objections regarding whether an appeal from a decision striking out an election petition was interlocutory or final and the necessity of obtaining leave to appeal.
- Gabisi v Alharazim, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 177
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: An appeal lies to the Court of Appeal from an ex parte judgment of the Supreme Court, as the Supreme Court lacks jurisdiction to review or set aside its own ex parte orders.
- Gwaro v Kenya Revenue Authority (Petition E036 of 2025) [2026] KESC 40 (KLR) (19 June 2026) (Ruling)
Kenya · 2026
Principle established: The Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction is limited to matters involving the interpretation or application of the Constitution, and mere invocation of constitutional provisions does not automatically confer such jurisdiction.
- Haja M. Kalokoh v Mrs. Neneh Kalokoh (CIVAPP 4/2025) [2026] SLCA 9 (21 July 2026)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2026
Principle established: Contentious probate issues should generally not be determined by an originating notice of motion, and an order for certiorari requires proper verification of the underlying warrant or conviction.
- Hendrix Laher and Another v the Director of Public Prosecutions (Being High Court, Judicial Review Cause No. 37 of 2025; MSCA Miscellaneous Civil Application 35 of 2025) [2026] MWSC 3 (13 May 2026)
Malawi · 2026
Principle established: A single judge of the Supreme Court of Appeal may exercise powers to grant or discharge a stay of execution pending the determination of an appeal.
- In Re: Contempt of Court Alleged Against Berthan Macaulay, Barrister & Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Sierra Leone (CR APP 38 of 1960) [1960] SLCA 4 (3 November 1960)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1960
Principle established: A superior court judge has summary jurisdiction to convict and fine for contempt of court committed in facie curiae without following ordinary criminal procedure or hearing formal evidence.
- In Re: Pierre Sarr N'jie; In Re: Rule 7, Order IX of the First Schedule to the Rules of the Supreme Court, 1928 (MISC CIV CASE 63 of 1958) [1959] SLCA 1 (5 June 1959)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1959
Principle established: A deputy judge lacks statutory jurisdiction to make disciplinary orders against a legal practitioner where such authority is not conferred by the Supreme Court Ordinance.
- Jalloh v R, 1957-60 ALR S.L. 1
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1957-60
Principle established: A district commissioner has absolute statutory jurisdiction under the Protectorate Ordinance to determine land disputes, unaffected by the general jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
- Jalloh v Reginam (WACA CR APP 3 of 1957) [1957] SLCA 1260 (20 March 1957)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1957
Principle established: A district commissioner's statutory authority to decide land disputes in the Protectorate is absolute and independent of urgency or the Supreme Court's concurrent jurisdiction.
- Jones v Master And Registrar & Administration-General (CIV APP 23 of 1971) [1973] SLCA 8 (8 November 1973)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1973
Principle established: A court cannot enforce a previous judgment upon an application by motion, but it possesses inherent jurisdiction to correct clerical errors and accidental omissions in its own records at any time.
- Jones v Sierra Leone Diamonds Ltd, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 117
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: A defendant who enters a conditional appearance does not waive the right to challenge jurisdiction merely by failing to initiate proceedings to set aside the writ.
- Juinor John Mansaray V Joseph P.A Koroma (CIV APP 68 of 2013) [2015] SLCA 1129 (1 December 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: An appeal against an interlocutory judgment requires leave of the court; failure to obtain such leave renders the appeal a nullity for lack of jurisdiction.
- Junior J. Mansaray v Mr Joseph P. A. Koroma (CIV APP 68 of 2013) [2015] SLCA 1135 (1 December 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal from an interlocutory order if the appellant failed to seek and obtain the necessary leave from the High Court.
- Kamara v Commissioner of Police, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 75
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: A statutory power to amend a charge does not permit the substitution of an entirely new and different charge, and a trial upon such a substituted charge is a nullity.
- Lansana Kpayenge v R (CR APP 49 of 1960) [1961] SLCA 3 (4 April 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: The general criminal jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under the Criminal Procedure Ordinance is not limited or restricted by the statutory wording of a committal form.
- Mariama K. Silla & ORS v The High Court of Sierra Leone & ORS (SC MISC APP 06/2025) [2026] SLSC 1 (15 June 2026)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2026
Principle established: The Supreme Court may exercise its supervisory jurisdiction through an order of certiorari to quash High Court orders that are made without jurisdiction or in violation of procedural rules.
