
Ejectment and recovery of possession
Doctrine in Land & Property. 21 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Benjamin Juxon Smith v Vincent Lamin Kanu (JR) (C.C App 52/22) [2024] SLCA 6 (13 June 2024)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2024
Principle established: A stay of execution pending appeal may be sought in the Court of Appeal after being refused in the High Court to prevent the recovery of possession of disputed land.
- Chinhoyi Municipality v Musonza (110 of 2023) [2023] ZWSC 52 (31 October 2023)
Zimbabwe · 2023
Principle established: A local authority is entitled to an order of ejectment against an individual who occupies municipal land without a valid legal basis or through fraudulent means.
- Doris Spencer v B. Gibson (MAG APP 44 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 21 (5 October 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: A person's mother constitutes a member of his 'family' within the meaning of the Rent Restriction Act for the purposes of ejectment proceedings.
- Doris Spencer v V.B Gibson (MAG APP 44 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 59 (5 October 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: Under section 12(1)(d) of the Rent Restriction Act, the term 'family' includes a landlord's mother, and an appeal may proceed in an absent party's absence upon proof of adequate notice.
- England & Others v. Official Administrator & Others (CC 520 of 1959) [1966] SLSC 2 (5 January 1966)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1966
Principle established: Recovery of possession of land may be granted under a claim for further and better relief in a title action, and a prior trespass judgment where ownership was not in controversy does not estop.
- Kabajungu v Akgizibwe (Civil Appeal 73 of 2010) [2015] UGCA 2024 (3 November 2015)
Uganda · 2015
Principle established: A purchaser of land who encroaches beyond the boundaries specified in the sale agreement is a trespasser and may be subject to eviction orders.
- Kargbo NO v Turay & Others (CIV APP 4 of 2012) [2012] SLSC 9 (19 October 2012)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2012
Principle established: An applicant may seek a stay of execution of a Court of Appeal order requiring them to vacate premises pending the determination of an application to the Supreme Court.
- Macfoy v U.A.C. of S.L. Ltd, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 3
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: Where a third party occupies premises in breach of a covenant against underletting, the tenant is the proper defendant in a recovery of possession action, though the occupier may be joined.
- Magid Basma & 8 Others v Hassan Baydoun & Sons (CIV APP 41 of 2014) [2019] SLCA 31 (2 April 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court examined the validity of a property sale by administrators of an intestate estate and the subsequent claim for recovery of possession against occupants.
- Magid Basma And Others v Hassan Baydoun & Sons (CIV APP 41 of 2014) [2019] SLCA 21 (2 April 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court examined the validity of a property sale by administrators of an intestate estate and the subsequent claim for recovery of possession against occupants.
- Mary Harding v Naba Osaio Khanu (CIV APP 11 of 2014) [2018] SLCA 1271 (6 August 2018)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2018
Principle established: A court may order the relocation of a party and the restoration of a spouse to the matrimonial home pending the return of the other spouse.
- Mohamed S. Jalloh & 4 Ors v Abdul Bangura (CIV APP 23 of 2013) [2014] SLCA 11 (20 March 2014)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2014
Principle established: A plaintiff is entitled to recover possession of premises and mesne profits from defendants who occupy the property without a valid legal basis or after the termination of their interest.
- Momodu Jalloh v Josephine Macfoy & Others (CIV APP 6 of 2009) [2019] SLCA 11 (8 April 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court considered whether a magistrate has the jurisdiction to stay the execution of an order made by another magistrate of concurrent jurisdiction and powers.
- Momodu Jalloh v Josephine Macfoy And Others (CIV APP 6 of 2009) [2019] SLCA 19 (6 April 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court considered whether a magistrate has the jurisdiction to stay the execution of an order made by another magistrate of concurrent jurisdiction and powers.
- Njovana v Karaga and 3 Others (124 of 2023) [2023] ZWSC 58 (3 October 2023)
Zimbabwe · 2023
Principle established: An appellate court may set aside a judgment and remit the matter for re-determination if the trial court failed to properly determine the issues before it.
- Ntambara v Segawole (Civil Application 52 of 2025) [2025] UGCA 113 (25 April 2025)
Uganda · 2025
Principle established: A temporary injunction may be issued to restrain eviction and maintain the status quo of suit land until the determination of a main application for a temporary injunction.
- Sibanda v Masanga (90 of 2024) [2024] ZWSC 90 (30 September 2024)
Zimbabwe · 2024
Principle established: An owner of registered property is entitled to an order of eviction against an occupant if the agreement of sale has been validly cancelled due to a breach of obligations.
- Sierra Leone Red Cross Society v Ayea R.Koroma (CIV APP 92 of 2019) [2022] SLCA 6 (27 October 2022)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2022
Principle established: A property owner or their administrator is entitled to recover possession and claim damages from a party that wrongfully occupies the land without legal title or permission.
- Williams v Kange (CIV APP 17 of 2007) [2013] SLCA 6 (21 June 2013)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2013
Principle established: In an action for declaration of title, a party's failure to produce a title deed in their own name may be fatal to their claim despite producing ancestral deeds.
- Willie Roberts v Laura Mason (32 of 1962) [1963] SLSC 21 (20 July 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: The jurisdiction of a magistrate under the Summary Ejectment Act is not ousted merely by raising a question of title, as deciding some questions of title is necessary under the Act.
- Willie Roberts v Laura Mason (MAG APP 32 of 1962) [1963] SLSC 48 (20 July 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: Raising an issue of title does not oust a magistrate's jurisdiction under the Summary Ejectment Act where determining certain questions of title is necessary to decide the ejectment.
