
Election petition
Doctrine in Election. 22 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Aaron Cole v Samura Sessay (EP 2 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 38 (3 August 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: A parliamentary nomination is invalid where one of the candidate's nominators is not an elector registered within that electoral constituency.
- Aaron Cole v Samura Sessay (EP 2 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 8 (3 August 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: A candidate's nomination for parliamentary election is invalidated if one of their nominators is not an elector of that constituency.
- Alhaji A.B. Mansaray v Abdul M. Iscandri & ORS (SC MISC APP 6 of 1984) [1984] SLSC 3 (14 February 1984)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1984
Principle established: The Supreme Court will refuse an application for special leave to appeal where the applicant fails to demonstrate that it is a proper case for the court to exercise its discretion.
- Amadu Hassan v John Karefa-Smart (CC 192 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 19 (28 June 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: Electoral returning officers exceed their jurisdiction by inquiring into the validity of a nominator's consent, and a nominator has no legal power to withdraw an already submitted nomination.
- Amadu Hassan v John Kerefa-Smart (CC 192 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 49 (28 June 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: Returning officers lack jurisdiction to investigate the circumstances of a nominator's consent or permit a nominator to withdraw a nomination once submitted.
- Borbor Fefegula-Kamba v Margaret G. Baio-Gbanie (CIV APP 44 of 2016) [2019] SLCA 4 (16 October 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: An election petition must be filed within the strict statutory time limits, and jurisdictional objections regarding the timing of the filing should be determined before proceeding to other applications.
- Francis F. Koroma v Hon Kusan Sesay & 3 Others (EP CIV APP 52 of 2018) [2019] SLCA 30 (10 April 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court addressed preliminary objections regarding whether an appeal from a decision striking out an election petition was interlocutory or final and the necessity of obtaining leave to appeal.
- Francis F. Koroma v Kusan Sesay & 3 Others (EP CIV APP 52 of 2018) [2019] SLCA 29 (10 April 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: Non-compliance with strict procedural rules for filing and presenting election petitions may result in the petition being struck out by the court.
- Gulama & Anor v Gulama & 2 Others (CIV APP 36 of 2012) [2012] SLCA 18 (22 November 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: The absence of a seal on an election petition may be considered a fatal irregularity that cannot be cured under the rules of court.
- Gulama & Two Others v Gulama & Anor (CIV APP 36 of 2010) [2012] SLCA 5 (26 April 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: A notice of appeal must comply with the rules of court regarding the identification of affected persons, or it may be subject to a motion to set aside.
- H. M. Kanagbo, W. L. Sherman, A. B. Fofana v H. M. Moriba v M. J. Kamanda Bongay (EP 27 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 17 (4 July 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: Rule 19 of the Election Petition Rules requiring an affidavit of service immediately after notice of presentation is mandatory, meaning filing must be done with reasonable promptness.
- H.M Kanagbo & 3 Others v M. J. Kamanda Bongay (CIV APP 14 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 40 (27 July 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: The requirement under rule 19 to file an affidavit of service immediately after service of an election petition is mandatory, and non-compliance requires striking out the petition.
- H.M Kanagbo & 3 Others v M.J Kamanda Bongay (EP 27 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 47 (4 July 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: The requirement to file an affidavit of service immediately after service in an election petition is mandatory, meaning with reasonable promptness, failure of which invalidates the proceedings.
- H.M. Kanagbo & Ors v M.J. Kamanda Bongay (CIV APP 14 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 11 (27 July 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: Rule 19 of the Election Petition Rules is mandatory, requiring an affidavit of service to be filed immediately after service; non-compliance warrants striking out rather than dismissing the petition.
- In Re: Application by Thomas J. T. Dixon for Leave to Apply for an Order of Certiorari (CC 253 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 10 (24 August 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: The statutory rules prescribing the service of election petitions and the timely filing of an affidavit of service are mandatory and cannot be waived.
- John O. Benjamin & 2 Others v Dr Christiana Thorpe & 3 Others (SC 4 of 2012) [2013] SLSC 5 (14 June 2013)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2013
Principle established: A petition challenging the election of a President is brought before the Supreme Court pursuant to the Constitution and the Public Elections Act.
- Manfred Onike Cole v Marcus Chamberlain Grant (EP 5 of 1962) [2020] SLSC 9 (2 July 2020)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2020
Principle established: Failure to properly serve notice of presentation of an election petition is not a mere formal objection, and service on an employee at a respondent's business is not valid personal service.
- Mia v Malola & Malawi Electoral Commision (Election Petition 58 of 2025) [2025] MWHC 24 (11 November 2025)
Malawi · 2025
Principle established: A candidate may challenge the results of a parliamentary election by filing a petition under the relevant electoral laws to address alleged irregularities in the conduct of the election.
- P.C. Torto v P.C. M'Briwa, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 456
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: Statutory requirements for delivering an election petition directly to an Electoral Commissioner are mandatory, and delivery to a mere employee deprives the court of jurisdiction, an irregularity which consent cannot waive.
- Petition against The Election of His Excellency Dr Ernest Bai Koroma as the President of the Republic of Sierra Leone as per the Declaration of the Result of the Presidential Elections of 17th November 2012 (SC 4 of 2013) [2013] SLSC 4 (14 June 2013)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2013
Principle established: The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear petitions challenging the declaration of presidential election results under the Constitution and the Public Elections Act.
- Sylvia Blyden v Chief Electoral Commissioner And Others (SC CIV 6 of 2018) [2018] SLSC 9 (18 July 2018)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2018
Principle established: The Supreme Court handles interlocutory applications within election petitions challenging the election of a President, involving the Chief Electoral Commissioner and political parties as respondents.
- Sylvia Blyden v The Chief Electoral Commissioner (SC 6 of 2018) [2018] SLSC 1 (18 July 2018)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2018
Principle established: The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over interlocutory applications in presidential election petitions to ensure the proper joinder of parties and the fair determination of the petition.
