
Natural justice
Doctrine in Administrative. 19 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Amadu Hassan v John Karefa-Smart (CC 192 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 19 (28 June 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: Electoral returning officers exceed their jurisdiction by inquiring into the validity of a nominator's consent, and a nominator has no legal power to withdraw an already submitted nomination.
- Amadu Hassan v John Kerefa-Smart (CC 192 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 49 (28 June 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: Returning officers lack jurisdiction to investigate the circumstances of a nominator's consent or permit a nominator to withdraw a nomination once submitted.
- Estate, Khalilu Jabbie v Skye Bank (SL) Ltd & Anor (MISC APP 45 of 2014) [2016] SLCA 1152 (9 December 2016)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2016
Principle established: The right to cross-examine a deponent on their affidavit is an incidental of the rule of natural justice, allowing parties to test the evidence presented in support of an application.
- Foulah v Kolifa Rowala Tribal Auth, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 142
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: A tribal authority violates natural justice when a chief sits as judge in his own cause, and subjecting a person to complete detention without lawful authority constitutes false imprisonment.
- In Re: Complaint by C.A. Hollist Against S.C. Berthan Macaulay & F.A. Short (CIV APP 44 of 1960) [1960] SLCA 3 (3 November 1960)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1960
Principle established: A disciplinary tribunal lacks jurisdiction to convict a legal practitioner of misconduct based on an accusation completely different from and inconsistent with the formal charge.
- JA-AB (SL) Ltd v PSG Shipping & Logistics (CIVAPP 60/2025) [2026] SLCA 6 (28 July 2026)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2026
Principle established: Appellate courts must ensure that the record of proceedings is complete and that all parties are heard in accordance with the principles of natural justice before determining an appeal.
- Kamande v Judicial Service Commission (Petition E005 of 2025) [2025] KESC 48 (KLR) (Civ) (15 August 2025) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2025
Principle established: Disciplinary proceedings against judicial staff must comply with constitutional requirements for a fair hearing, including the right to confront accusers and the avoidance of inordinate delays.
- N'danema v Renner & Ors (WACA CIV APP 31 of 1955) [1956] SLCA 2 (29 May 1956)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1956
Principle established: A court will not intervene in the disciplinary proceedings of a domestic or ecclesiastical quasi-judicial tribunal until all internal rights of appeal under the body's constitution have been exhausted.
- PETROZIM Line Private Limited v Hova (67 of 2025) [2025] ZWSC 67 (30 July 2025)
Zimbabwe · 2025
Principle established: Disciplinary proceedings against an employee for public statements undermining the employer's image are subject to judicial review to ensure compliance with the relevant code of conduct and principles of fairness.
- Raymond Coker v Alpha Kamara (CIV APP 16 of 2017) [2022] SLCA 22 (9 June 2022)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2022
Principle established: A judgment obtained without proper service of process on a defendant residing outside the jurisdiction violates the principles of natural justice and the right to a fair hearing.
- Raymond S Kargbo v Attorney General & Minister of Justice (CIV APP 29 of 2020) [2022] SLCA 3 (18 December 2022)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2022
Principle established: Commissions of Inquiry must be conducted in accordance with prescribed rules of practice and procedure to ensure fairness and compliance with constitutional requirements.
- Ridge v Baldwin [1963] UKHL 2 (14 March 1963)
United Kingdom · 1963
Principle established: Public bodies must observe the rules of natural justice, including the right to a fair hearing, when making decisions that affect an individual's rights or livelihood.
- Samuel C. C. Pyne-Bailey v A. B. S. Janneh (21 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 27 (23 July 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: The Electoral Commission acts judicially when hearing appeals regarding nomination papers and violates natural justice by deciding an objection without hearing the affected party or having a prior decision from the Returning Officer.
- Samuel C.C Pyne-Bailey v A.B.S Janneh (EP 21 of 1962) [1962] SLSC 48 (23 July 1962)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1962
Principle established: An electoral commission exercising appellate functions over nomination objections acts judicially and violates natural justice if it determines an objection without affording the affected party a hearing.
- Samuel C.C. Pyne-Bailey v A.B.S. Janneh (EP 21 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 5 (23 July 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: The Electoral Commission exercises a judicial function regarding nomination objections and violates natural justice if it determines the matter without giving the petitioner a hearing.
- State (on the Application of Major) v Secretary General of Malawi Congress Party (MSCA Civil Application 46 of 2022) [2024] MWSC 10 (14 June 2024)
Malawi · 2024
Principle established: A decision to expel a member from a political party is subject to judicial review if it is alleged that the expulsion occurred without a prior disciplinary hearing.
- THE REPUBLIC VRS BANK OF GHANA [2024] GHASC 40 (26 June 2024)
Ghana · 2024
Principle established: Administrative bodies and officials must act fairly and reasonably, complying with legal requirements, and their decisions are subject to judicial review by the High Court.
- Tryphena Langley v E.D.E.M. Coker (CR APP 14 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 11 (5 July 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: A summary conviction must be set aside where the accused was wrongly denied the opportunity to make submissions to the trial magistrate.
- Unique Furnishing Limited v Holman Brothers Limited (H1/217/2025) [2026] GHACA 4 (24 July 2026)
Ghana · 2026
Principle established: A fair trial requires judicial independence and the absence of bias or conflict of interest, as these elements are fundamental to the integrity of the justice system and natural justice.
