
Wrongful dismissal
Doctrine in Labour & Employment. 23 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- A. J. G. Williams v Sierra Leone Development Company (CC 232 of 1958) [1961] SLSC 23 (5 June 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: An indefinite contract of service is terminable only upon reasonable notice, and wrongful summary dismissal entitles the employee to salary arrears and remuneration in lieu of reasonable notice.
- Abdul Rahman Jalloh v The West Africa Regional Director (CIV APP 2 of 2009) [2015] SLSC 1210 (24 November 2015)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2015
Principle established: The Supreme Court hears cross-appeals from the Court of Appeal to determine the correctness of orders made in employment-related disputes.
- Bangura v Sierra Leone Electricity Corporation (SC CIV APP 10 of 1981) [1983] SLSC 15 (5 May 1983)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1983
Principle established: Summary dismissal is only justified where the employee's misconduct is gravely incompatible with the employment, and an appellate court may evaluate overall evidence when not disturbing findings based on witness credibility.
- Charles D.K Nicol V Country Director, Care International in Sierra Leone & ANOR (CIV APP 5 of 2007) [2015] SLCA 1126 (12 February 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: Termination of a fixed-term employment contract during a probationary period must be conducted in accordance with the terms of the offer letter and the employer's human resources manual.
- Comium (S.L) Limited V Jemima M. M'cormack (CIV APP 27 of 2012) [2014] SLCA 2 (18 May 2014)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2014
Principle established: An employer may be liable for damages and terminal benefits if they unlawfully or unfairly terminate an employee's contract, especially during periods of illness or medical treatment.
- Heroe v F.C.S.C. Ltd, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 73
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: An employee is prima facie liable for loss of or damage to employer property entrusted to their care, and summary dismissal is justified unless the employee proves absence of negligence.
- Manyenga v PetroZim (Private) Limited (40 of 2023) [2023] ZWSC 27 (18 May 2023)
Zimbabwe · 2023
Principle established: An employee's failure to fulfill express or implied conditions of their contract, such as reporting critical operational challenges to the board, may constitute misconduct justifying dismissal.
- Marie Stopes (SL) v Gloria Mac-Conteh (CIV APP 30 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 33 (5 February 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: A trial judge must analyze the merits of the case and refer to legal principles when dealing with applications for summary judgment, rather than delivering a brief ruling without analysis.
- Marie Stopes Sierra Leone v Gloria Mac Conteh (CIV APP 30 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 22 (5 January 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: A trial judge must analyze the merits of the case and refer to legal principles when dealing with applications for summary judgment, rather than delivering a brief ruling without analysis.
- Marie Stopes SL v Gloria Mac-Conteh (CIV APP 30 of 2010) [2019] SLCA 10 (5 February 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: A trial judge must analyze the merits of the case and refer to legal principles when dealing with applications for summary judgment, rather than delivering a brief ruling without analysis.
- Mason v Mayor, Aldermen, Councillors & Citizens of Freetown (WACA CIV APP 2 of 1951) [1951] SLCA 2 (10 December 1951)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1951
Principle established: An indefinite contract of employment can only be terminated summarily for serious misconduct or upon reasonable notice, the length of which depends on the employee's status, salary, and service.
- Msosa & Ors. v FDH Bank Ltd (Miscellaneous Civil Application 7 of 2023) [2023] MWSC 3 (8 March 2023)
Malawi · 2023
Principle established: An application for extension of time to appeal is discretionary and requires the applicant to show good cause for the delay and that the appeal has prospects of success.
- Msosa & Others v FDH Bank Limited (Miscellaneous Civil Application 7 of 2023) [2023] MWSC 23 (8 March 2023)
Malawi · 2023
Principle established: The court will consider the length of the delay, the reasons for it, and the potential prejudice to the parties when deciding whether to enlarge the time for filing an appeal.
- Msosa and Others v FDH Bank Limited (Miscellaneous Civil Application 7 of 2023) [2023] MWSC 5 (8 March 2023)
Malawi · 2023
Principle established: Granting an extension of time to appeal is an exercise of judicial discretion aimed at ensuring that substantial justice is done between the parties.
- Muchena v The Police Service Commission and Another (65 of 2025) [2025] ZWSC 65 (29 July 2025)
Zimbabwe · 2025
Principle established: A public officer may be lawfully discharged from service following a suitability board's finding of misconduct, even if criminal proceedings for the same underlying conduct are still pending.
- Mugari v Chinhoyi University of Technology (126 of 2023) [2023] ZWSC 55 (31 August 2023)
Zimbabwe · 2023
Principle established: Condonation for the late filing of an application for leave to appeal will be refused if the applicant fails to provide a reasonable explanation for the delay or lacks prospects of success.
- Muktarr Kallay v United Africa Company (403 of 1957) [1961] SLSC 36 (17 June 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: An employee wrongfully dismissed under a yearly hiring contract is entitled to damages reflecting salary and commissions earned for the duration of the requisite notice period.
- Owira v Kenya Revenue Authority (Civil Application E019 of 2026) [2026] KECA 2026 (KLR) (19 June 2026) (Ruling)
Kenya · 2026
Principle established: Time to file a record of appeal may be extended where the delay is caused by difficulties in obtaining certified proceedings and a certificate of delay is provided.
- PETROZIM Line Private Limited v Hova (67 of 2025) [2025] ZWSC 67 (30 July 2025)
Zimbabwe · 2025
Principle established: Disciplinary proceedings against an employee for public statements undermining the employer's image are subject to judicial review to ensure compliance with the relevant code of conduct and principles of fairness.
- Ridge v Baldwin [1963] UKHL 2 (14 March 1963)
United Kingdom · 1963
Principle established: Public bodies must observe the rules of natural justice, including the right to a fair hearing, when making decisions that affect an individual's rights or livelihood.
- Sahid v Alharazim, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 43
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68
Principle established: A single instance of grave dereliction of duty may justify summary dismissal without notice where the governing terms permit termination for disregard of duty.
- The United Africa Company v Muktarr Kallay (CIV APP 37 of 1960) [1960] SLCA 2 (2 November 1960)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1960
Principle established: A commercial contract of employment containing an express clause for termination on one month's notice is not a yearly hiring, restricting wrongful dismissal damages to the notice period.
- Treger Plastics (Private) Limited v Dube (8 of 2025) [2025] ZWSC 8 (31 January 2025)
Zimbabwe · 2025
Principle established: An application for condonation and extension of time to appeal in a labour matter requires the applicant to explain the delay and demonstrate the merits of the intended appeal.
