
Breach and remedies
Doctrine in Contract. 42 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- A. J. G. Williams v Sierra Leone Development Company (CC 232 of 1958) [1961] SLSC 23 (5 June 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: An indefinite contract of service is terminable only upon reasonable notice, and wrongful summary dismissal entitles the employee to salary arrears and remuneration in lieu of reasonable notice.
- Barclays Bank D.C.O v B.D. Khalil & Sons And Another (CIV APP 15 of 1970) [1972] SLCA 1277 (2 February 1972)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1972
Principle established: The presumption that an indefinite hiring is a yearly contract can be rebutted by contrary intention such as a contractual termination notice clause, and notice may run during paid leave.
- Beresford Cole v Mendekia (CIV APP 2 of 1973) [1974] SLCA 4 (29 October 1974)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1974
Principle established: A contract requires a concluded bargain embodying all essential terms, and failure to complete construction within the agreed period constitutes an actionable breach of contract.
- Charles D.K Nicol V Country Director, Care International in Sierra Leone & ANOR (CIV APP 5 of 2007) [2015] SLCA 1126 (12 February 2015)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2015
Principle established: Termination of a fixed-term employment contract during a probationary period must be conducted in accordance with the terms of the offer letter and the employer's human resources manual.
- Christian Ogoo V Huawei Technologies Ltd & Cellcom Telecommunications Sierra Leone Limited (CIV APP 31 of 2012) [2012] SLCA 25 (3 February 2012)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2012
Principle established: Disputes arising from international contracts for the supply of telecommunications equipment and subsequent equity transactions are subject to judicial review on appeal.
- Coker v Taylor Woodrow (CIVIL CASE 290 of 1966) [1967] SLSC 1211 (5 February 1967)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1967
Principle established: A party leading another to believe strict contractual terms will not be enforced cannot later insist upon those rights when inequitable, and a tenant holding over under an invitation to renew is not wrongful.
- Coker v Taylor Woodrow (S.L.), Ltd, 1967-68 ALR S.L. 35
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1967-68
Principle established: A party who induces another to believe strict contractual rights will not be enforced cannot resile from that position when it would be inequitable, amounting to a waiver.
- Femi Hebron v White Lion Company Ltd & 2 Others (CIV APP 50 of 2017) [2019] SLCA 28 (1 October 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court considered whether a defendant was personally liable for a contract or if the transaction was entered into by a corporate entity, emphasizing the distinction between personal and corporate liability.
- First International Bank (SL) Ltd v Sigma Engineering & Construction Services Limited And Another (CIV APP 1 of 2014) [2017] SLCA 1228 (2 March 2017)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2017
Principle established: A defendant may be refused leave to defend and summary judgment granted to the plaintiff where there is no triable issue regarding the recovery of sums due under a contract.
- Freetown Cold Storage Co. Ltd & Anor v Flower Garden Contractors (CIV APP 27 of 1960) [1960] SLCA 1 (2 November 1960)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1960
Principle established: Damages for breach of contract are assessed by subtracting the labour costs saved from the unpaid contract price, and related tort claims may be joined to avoid multiplicity of actions.
- Gaye v Sierra Leone Ports Authority (CIV APP 20 of 2010) [2013] SLCA 15 (13 November 2013)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2013
Principle established: A contract for the purchase of a vehicle, though not in writing, may be evidenced by a proforma invoice and subsequent part payment.
- Hadley v Baxendale [1854] EWHC J70 (9 February 1854)
United Kingdom · 1854
Principle established: Damages for breach of contract are limited to losses that arise naturally from the breach or that were within the reasonable contemplation of both parties at the time of contracting.
- Ilyas Vali v Pacific Limited (Commercial Case No. 155 of 2023) [2026] MWHC 23 (8 May 2026)
Malawi · 2026
Principle established: A court may set aside a default judgment if the defendant demonstrates a prima facie defense on the merits and provides a reasonable explanation for the failure to file a defense.
- Kaa Law v Bank Of Ghana (H1/236/2025) [2026] GHACA 2 (24 July 2026)
Ghana · 2026
Principle established: Law firms providing non-legal services may be subject to different rules regarding fee recovery and agency relationships compared to traditional legal practice.
- Longstreath v Venn, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 149
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: A purchaser may rescind a land sale contract and recover their deposit if the vendor cannot complete, and beneficiaries cannot sell estate land under administration without a vesting deed.
- Madzimbamuto v Musamadiya (235 of 2024) [2024] ZWHHC 235 (6 June 2024)
Zimbabwe · 2024
Principle established: Contempt of court proceedings serve to punish disobedience and enforce court orders, particularly orders requiring a party to perform a specific act, such as signing transfer papers for a property sale.
- Mansour v El Nasr Export & Import Co, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 385
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: The defence of accord and satisfaction to a breach of contract claim must be specifically pleaded and requires both an accord and full performance of the satisfaction.
- Mansour v El Nasr Export and Import Company (CIV APP 6 of 1973) [1973] SLCA 7 (18 October 1973)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1973
Principle established: The defence of accord and satisfaction must be specifically pleaded and requires not only an agreement to discharge the breach of contract but also full performance of the promised satisfaction.
- Mendekia v Beresford-Cole (CIV APP 12 of 1972) [1973] SLCA 6 (11 July 1973)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1973
Principle established: An agency relationship exists only where one party authorizes another to represent them and alter their legal relations with third parties.
- Mendekia v Beresford-Cole, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 321
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: An agency relationship exists when a principal expressly or impliedly authorises an agent to represent them and affect their legal relations with third parties.
- Michael K. Ondaan v Lap Green Network Limited (CIV APP 13 of 2017) [2018] SLCA 1284 (15 May 2018)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2018
Principle established: A party may invoke an arbitration clause in a share purchase agreement to have the court appoint an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from the agreement.
- Mohamed Bangura v Dalian Shengai Ocean Fishing & Ors (SC CIV APP 1 of 2018) [2019] SLSC 1 (29 November 2019)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2019
Principle established: Whether an agent contracts personally or solely for a principal is a question of fact; appellate courts are reluctant to interfere with findings of fact regarding oral contracts.
- Mohamed Bangura v Dalian Shengai Ocean Fishing & Ors (SC CIV APP 1 of 2018) [2019] SLSC 2 (29 November 2019)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2019
Principle established: An authorized representative with ostensible authority can enter into agreements that bind a company, establishing a valid agency relationship.
- Mohamed Bangura v Dalian Shengai Ocean Fishing Co And 2 Others (SC CIV APP 1 of 2018) [2019] SLSC 3 (29 November 2019)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2019
Principle established: The court examined the formation of an agency agreement between a local fisherman and a foreign fishing company through representatives claiming ostensible authority.
- Mohamed Bangura v Dalien Shengai Ocean Fishing & Co & 2 Others (SC CIV APP 1 of 2018) [2019] SLSC 5 (29 November 2019)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 2019
Principle established: The court examined the formation of an agency agreement between a local fisherman and a foreign fishing company through representatives claiming ostensible authority.
- Momoh v Lansana & 2 Others (CIV APP 43 of 2012) [2013] SLCA 4 (20 June 2013)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2013
Principle established: A defendant may seek a stay of execution of a judgment for the recovery of funds paid for construction work pending the determination of an appeal.
- Mr.Jamiru Momoh v Mrs Annie Lansana And Others (CIV APP 43 of 2012) [2013] SLCA 21 (20 June 2013)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2013
Principle established: A stay of execution may be sought pending appeal where a judgment was entered for the recovery of payments made under a construction contract.
- Muktarr Kallay v United Africa Company (403 of 1957) [1961] SLSC 36 (17 June 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: An employee wrongfully dismissed under a yearly hiring contract is entitled to damages reflecting salary and commissions earned for the duration of the requisite notice period.
- Ongeso v South Nyanza Sugar Company Limited (Civil Appeal 123 of 2018) [2023] KEHC 2026 (KLR) (15 February 2023) (Judgment)
Kenya · 2023
Principle established: A party is liable for damages for breach of contract where they fail to perform their obligations, such as harvesting crops as agreed, resulting in loss to the other party.
- Osman Thomas Sons & Bros v Hassan (CIV APP 38 of 1976) [1976] SLCA 9 (29 June 1976)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1976
Principle established: The anticipatory repudiation of a contract by one party does not automatically terminate the contract unless accepted by the other party.
- Sawaneh v Bayoh [1990] SLSC 2 (3 July 1990)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1990
Principle established: An appellate court cannot determine an unargued issue without hearing counsel, nor does it have legal authority to impose a time limit within which damages must be paid.
- Shell Co. of West Africa Limited v Mohammed Ahmed & Anor (t/a Ahmed Bros.) (CIV APP 7 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 22 (7 November 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: A party whose authorized agent accepts delivery of goods and resells them to customers is bound by that acceptance and obligated to pay for them.
- Sibanda v Masanga (90 of 2024) [2024] ZWSC 90 (30 September 2024)
Zimbabwe · 2024
Principle established: An owner of registered property is entitled to an order of eviction against an occupant if the agreement of sale has been validly cancelled due to a breach of obligations.
- Sillah v S.C.O.A. Ltd, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 192
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: Upon the owner's breach of a hire-purchase agreement depriving the hirer of possession, damages normally comprise the deposit and instalments paid, plus any additional proven loss.
- Tanios Gebran Chaghoury v Jamal k. Wansa (CIVAPP 57/24) [2025] SLCA 1 (11 February 2025)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2025
Principle established: Where a property is sold under a sales agreement, the purchaser's compliance with the prescribed mode of payment and the issuance of a receipt by the vendor confirms the transfer of ownership.
- The United Africa Company v Muktarr Kallay (CIV APP 37 of 1960) [1960] SLCA 2 (2 November 1960)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1960
Principle established: A commercial contract of employment containing an express clause for termination on one month's notice is not a yearly hiring, restricting wrongful dismissal damages to the notice period.
- Thomas v Samura (CIV APP 5 of 2006) [2013] SLCA 7 (21 June 2013)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2013
Principle established: A vendor may not unilaterally terminate an agreement for the sale of land where the purchaser's failure to pay the balance on time does not justify such termination.
- Umaru Zoker & Others v Lincoln Construction & Logistics & Another (MISC APP 19 of 2022) [2024] SLCA 4 (28 February 2024)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2024
Principle established: A party is entitled to recover sums due and damages where there is a proven breach of a memorandum of understanding or agreement between the parties.
- Union Trust Bank Limited v Mohamed Kakay (CIV APP 4 of 2019) [2019] SLCA 17 (7 June 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: An application for a stay of execution pending appeal requires the court to consider whether there are triable issues and if the appeal would be rendered nugatory without the stay.
- Union Trust Bank Limited v Mohamed Kakay (CIV APP 4 of 2019) [2019] SLCA 27 (6 May 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: An application for a stay of execution pending appeal requires the court to consider whether there are triable issues and if the appeal would be rendered nugatory without the stay.
