
Fraud and false pretences
Doctrine in Criminal. 15 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Alimu Bah V The State (CR APP 52 of 2010) [2014] SLCA 1 (6 May 2014)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2014
Principle established: In criminal cases involving the handling of project funds, the prosecution must establish the specific legal obligation of the accused to deal with the property in a particular manner.
- Columbus Moses Anriti Thompson v R (CR APP 20 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 12 (6 July 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: A trial judge summing up to assessors does not usurp their function or misdirect them where he accurately summarizes the evidence and fairly presents the defence.
- Garber v R, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 233
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: A storekeeper who receives his employer's goods into the store and subsequently removes them animo furandi commits larceny by a servant rather than embezzlement.
- Hakim and Others v Osikan (J4/12/2026) [2026] GHASC 73 (3 June 2026)
Ghana · 2026
Principle established: A judgment obtained through fraud or deceit is not entitled to legal respect and may be set aside, as fraud vitiates all judicial proceedings.
- Julius v S (10 of 2026) [2026] ZWHHC 287 (13 February 2026)
Zimbabwe · 2026
Principle established: A court must exercise judicious discretion when determining bail, providing a full analysis of the grounds for refusal rather than merely reciting the law and parties' submissions.
- Kaggwa v Musiimenta (Civil Appeal 10 of 2022) [2024] UGSC 41 (20 June 2024)
Uganda · 2024
Principle established: A registered proprietor may recover land where the title was transferred through fraud, even if the land was subsequently sold to a third party.
- Kagonye v State (32 of 2024) [2024] ZWSC 32 (26 March 2024)
Zimbabwe · 2024
Principle established: A public official may be convicted of theft of trust property if they misappropriated assets entrusted to them in their official capacity.
- Kenny v S (SC CRIM APP 2 of 1982) [1983] SLSC 18 (28 May 1983)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1983
Principle established: To convict a person of fraudulent conversion, the prosecution must prove a fraudulent and dishonest intent, which may be inferred from the natural and probable consequences of the accused person's acts.
- Musa v S (CR APP 7 of 1976) [1978] SLCA 2 (3 May 1978)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1978
Principle established: A conviction for obtaining money by false pretences cannot be sustained where there is insufficient evidence to prove the falsity of the pretence made.
- Mutakura v S (SC 766/25) [2026] ZWSC 14 (17 February 2026)
Zimbabwe · 2026
Principle established: A conviction for fraud will be upheld where the evidence establishes that the accused made a misrepresentation with the intent to defraud, resulting in prejudice.
- Ncube v S (HCBCR 1442/26) [2026] ZWBHC 117 (28 August 2026)
Zimbabwe · 2026
Principle established: Fraud is committed when a person makes a false representation with the intent to deceive, causing another person to act to their prejudice.
- R v Arthur B. O. Williams (12 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 20 (2 July 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A charge of forgery and uttering cannot succeed without sufficient direct or circumstantial evidence establishing that the disputed document was indeed forged.
- Regina v Amadu B. Chirm (CR APP 29 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1248 (11 December 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: A conviction for obtaining by false pretences requires satisfactory proof that the victims were actually influenced by the alleged false representations.
- Regina v Arthur B.O Williams (IC 12 of 1963) [1963] SLSC 47 (2 July 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: A charge of forgery and uttering cannot succeed without sufficient direct or circumstantial evidence establishing that the disputed document was indeed forged.
- S v Harry (36 of 2022) [2022] ZWHHC 36 (19 January 2022)
Zimbabwe · 2022
Principle established: Theft of trust property occurs when a person unlawfully converts goods or money held on behalf of another to their own use in violation of a trust agreement.
