
Mens rea
Doctrine in Criminal. 23 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Cole v S (CR APP 2 of 1975) [1975] SLCA 1 (21 December 1975)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1975
Principle established: An indictment for embezzlement is defective if it omits the word "fraudulently", as fraudulent intention is an essential element that must be specifically averred in the particulars of offence.
- Cole v S (Criminal Appeal 2 of 1975) [1975] SLSC 5 (21 December 1975)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1975
Principle established: An indictment charging embezzlement must explicitly aver the element of fraudulent intention, and the omission of the word "fraudulently" renders the charge fatally defective.
- Comptroller of Customs v Basma, 1920-36 ALR S.L. 428
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1920-36
Principle established: Statutory prohibitions against importing improperly folded woven goods create offenses of absolute liability, though compliance warnings to overseas suppliers may mitigate sentencing.
- Dumbar v S (CR APP 26 of 1971) [1972] SLCA 1279 (15 February 1972)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1972
Principle established: A charge of using insulting words to provoke a breach of the peace does not require specifying the person insulted, and minor verbal clerical defects do not invalidate the charge.
- Dumbar v State, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 41
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: A charge of insulting conduct under public order legislation does not require naming the specific person insulted, and intent to provoke a breach of the peace may be inferred from context.
- In Re: the Will & Codicil Oft. I. Scott (deceased) [1963] SLCA 1234 (14 November 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: Proof that the accused intended to cause at least grievous bodily harm to the deceased warrants a conviction for murder based on malice aforethought.
- Joe Gbondo v Regina (3 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 21 (19 March 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: Malice aforethought can be established even if formed only an extremely short space of time before the commission of the fatal act.
- Joe Gbondo v Regina (CRI APP 3 of 1962) [1962] SLCA 48 (19 March 1962)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1962
Principle established: Malice aforethought for murder may exist even where it is formed only for a very brief duration before the act.
- Kamara v S (CR APP 5 of 1973) [1973] SLCA 9 (8 November 1973)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1973
Principle established: A misdirection on law or fact requires quashing a conviction unless, on a proper direction, the only reasonable verdict is guilty; 'grievous bodily harm' bears its ordinary meaning of really serious injury.
- Kenny v S (SC CRIM APP 2 of 1982) [1983] SLSC 18 (28 May 1983)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1983
Principle established: To convict a person of fraudulent conversion, the prosecution must prove a fraudulent and dishonest intent, which may be inferred from the natural and probable consequences of the accused person's acts.
- Kilbert Turay & Regina (CR APP 23 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1233 (13 November 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: An intention to inflict grievous bodily harm satisfies the mental element of malice aforethought required for murder.
- Kilbert Turay & Regina (CR APP 24 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1232 (13 November 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: An intention to inflict at least grievous bodily harm upon the deceased suffices to sustain a finding of murder with malice aforethought.
- Kilbert Turay v Regina (CR APP 23 of 1963) [1963] SLCA 1261 (13 November 1963)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1963
Principle established: Evidence showing an intention to inflict at least grievous bodily harm is sufficient to establish malice aforethought in a murder trial.
- Mawela & Another v S (377/2021) [2022] ZASCA 18 (16 February 2022)
South Africa · 2022
Principle established: To secure a murder conviction on the basis of common purpose with dolus eventualis, the State must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused actively associated with the criminal conduct and foresaw the fatal result.
- R v Lamin, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 346
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: In determining whether a political publication is seditious, the court must construe the work as a whole with due regard for press freedom, rather than focusing solely on objectionable excerpts.
- Regina v Musa Koroma (14 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 25 (6 November 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: A conviction for murder will be sustained where eyewitness testimony links the weapon to the victim and the evidence sufficiently establishes malice aforethought.
- S v Karomo (546 of 2022) [2022] ZWHHC 546 (8 August 2022)
Zimbabwe · 2022
Principle established: Magistrates must exercise caution when accepting a plea of guilty from an accused person who appears to suffer from a mental disorder, ensuring the plea is genuine and understood.
- S v Mhunza (303 of 2023) [2023] ZWHHC 220 (16 May 2023)
Zimbabwe · 2023
Principle established: A conviction for murder requires proof beyond reasonable doubt that the accused unlawfully caused the death of the deceased with the requisite intent or realization of the risk of death.
- S v Mutezo (126 of 2024) [2024] ZWHHC 126 (25 March 2024)
Zimbabwe · 2024
Principle established: A defense of mental disorder in a murder trial requires evidence that the accused was incapable of appreciating the unlawfulness of their conduct at the time of the offence.
- S v Mutyambizi (550 of 2022) [2022] ZWHHC 550 (16 August 2022)
Zimbabwe · 2022
Principle established: A plea of guilty must be unequivocal; if the accused provides an explanation that impacts the admission of guilt, the court must record a plea of not guilty.
- Sannoh v S (CR APP 11 of 1977) [1979] SLCA 11 (18 December 1979)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1979
Principle established: A judge's summing-up on a murder charge must adequately direct the jury on the issue of malice aforethought and alternative verdicts such as manslaughter when defences like self-defence or provocation are rejected.
- Wreh (or Dee) v R, 1950-56 ALR S.L. 153
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1950-56
Principle established: Drunkenness does not amount to a defence to a criminal charge unless it renders the accused incapable of forming the specific intent necessary to constitute the offence.
- Wreh (or Dee) v. R (CIV APP 12 of 1951) [1951] SLCA 4 (14 December 1951)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1951
Principle established: Drunkenness is only a defense if it rendered the accused incapable of forming the specific intent required for the offense or induced a state of actual insanity.
