Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Glasgow Corporation v Taylor

1922 · [1922] 1 AC 44

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts

A seven-year-old boy ate poisonous berries from a bush in a public park and died. The bush looked attractive and was not fenced.

Issue

Is an occupier liable for an attractive danger to children?

Held

The Corporation could be liable.

Principle

A tempting danger can be an 'allurement' to children. An occupier must take more care for children than for adults.

Why it matters

The leading case.

Cited in these chapters

Cite this page

Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44 (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/glasgow-corporation-v-taylor> accessed 31 October 2026

The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.

This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.