Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

De Crespigny v Wellesley

1829

Posted By lanbuk.com

Please note: The full report of this case could not be confirmed; this summary is limited to the point the case is usually cited for.

Facts

Cited for the point that repeating someone else's words is a fresh publication; wrong is not justified by wrong (Best CJ).

Issue

Is repeating a libel a defence?

Held

Repeating someone else's defamatory words is a fresh publication; wrong is not justified by wrong (Best CJ).

Principle

Repeating someone else's defamatory words is a fresh publication; wrong is not justified by wrong (Best CJ).

Why it matters

Repetition rule.

Cited in these chapters

Cite this page

De Crespigny v Wellesley (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/de-crespigny-v-wellesley> accessed 31 October 2026

The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.

This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.