Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Curtis v Curtis

1834

Posted By lanbuk.com

Please note: The full report of this case could not be confirmed; this summary is limited to the point the case is usually cited for.

Facts

Cited for the point that saying 'you have committed an act for which I can put you in prison' was .

Issue

Must the crime be named?

Held

Saying 'you have committed an act for which I can put you in prison' was actionable per se.

Principle

Saying 'you have committed an act for which I can put you in prison' was actionable per se.

Why it matters

General imputation of crime.

Cited in these chapters

Cite this page

Curtis v Curtis (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/curtis-v-curtis> accessed 31 October 2026

The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.

This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.