Please note: The full report of this case could not be confirmed; this summary is limited to the point the case is usually cited for.
Facts
Cited for the point that saying 'you have committed an act for which I can put you in prison' was .
Issue
Must the crime be named?
Held
Saying 'you have committed an act for which I can put you in prison' was actionable per se.
Principle
Saying 'you have committed an act for which I can put you in prison' was actionable per se.
Why it matters
General imputation of crime.
Cited in these chapters
Cite this page
Curtis v Curtis (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/curtis-v-curtis> accessed 31 October 2026
The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.
This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.

