Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd

1973 · [1973] QB 27

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts

Contractors cut a power cable, and the claimant's steel factory lost power.

Issue

What losses could the factory recover?

Held

It recovered for the damaged melt and the profit on it, but not for profits lost while the power was off.

Principle

consequential on physical damage is recoverable; pure economic loss is not.

Why it matters

The leading illustration of the line.

Cited in these chapters

Cite this page

Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd [1973] QB 27 (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/spartan-steel-v-martin> accessed 31 October 2026

The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.

This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.