Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Ruddiman & Co v Smith

1889

Posted By lanbuk.com

Facts

A clerk used the office washroom a few minutes after work ended and left a tap running, flooding the next-door premises.

Issue

Was this within the ?

Held

Yes; the employers were liable.

Principle

Acts reasonably incidental to work, shortly after hours, can be within the course of employment.

Why it matters

Time and course of employment.

Cited in these chapters

Cite this page

Ruddiman & Co v Smith (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/ruddiman-v-smith> accessed 31 October 2026

The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.

This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.