Skip to content
The scales of justice on a plain background

Jones v Jones

1916

Posted By lanbuk.com

Please note: The full report of this case could not be confirmed; this summary is limited to the point the case is usually cited for.

Facts

Cited for the point that an accusation that a schoolmaster committed adultery with a cleaner did not touch him in his profession, so was not .

Issue

When do words touch a profession?

Held

An accusation that a schoolmaster committed adultery with a cleaner did not touch him in his profession, so was not actionable per se.

Principle

An accusation that a schoolmaster committed adultery with a cleaner did not touch him in his profession, so was not actionable per se.

Why it matters

Professional exception.

Cited in these chapters

Cite this page

Jones v Jones (Lanbuk) <https://www.lanbuk.com/llb/torts/cases/jones-v-jones> accessed 31 October 2026

The accessed date is today's date. Check your course or publisher's style guide.

This summary is a Lanbuk study aid based on the generally known facts and reports of the case. It is not legal advice.