
Victor Alphonso Deveneaux v John Kamara & Ors (SC CIV APP 6 of 2012) [2014] SLSC 10 (10 June 2014)
Posted By lanbuk.com
Victor Alphonso Deveneaux v John Kamara & Ors is a civil appeal from Sierra Leone on 10 June 2014. Cite it as [2014] SLSC 10. Search it by the party names, the citation [2014] SLSC 10, or Sierra Leone civil appeal.
June 10, 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT
Victor Alphonso Deveneaux
Appellant
v.
John Kamara & Ors
Respondent
SC CIV APP 6 of 2012
[2014] SLSC 10
Case brief
- Court
- Sierra Leone — Supreme Court
- Date
- 10 June 2014
- Citation
- [2014] SLSC 10
- File number
- SC CIV APP 6 of 2012
- Proceeding
- Civil appeal. Sierra Leone.
- Principle
- An appellant may apply to restore a dismissed appeal and for an enlargement of time to file their case pursuant to the Supreme Court Rules. By lanbuk.com
Only what is recorded for this judgment is shown. · Browse cases by topic
‘ ae y SC CIV APP NO 6/2012 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SIERRA LEONE CIVIL r BETWEEN: VICTOR ALPHONSO DEVENEAUX - / AND JOHN KAMARA - 18" /RESPONDENT MOHAMED KAMARA -_-28? RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Coram
HON MR JUSTICE P.O. HAMILTON - JSC HON MR JUSTICE V. V. THOMAS - JSC HON MRS JUSTICE V.A. D. WRIGHT - JSC M P Fofanah Esq for the /Applicant ND Tejan Cole Esq for the Respondent/ Respondent tk. OA be j Ruling Delivered on the |D Raa 2011 bid Wright JSC- This is an application on behalf of the Appellant/Applicant for the following Orders:-
1. That the Appellant/Applicant’s notice of Civil Appeal dated the 11" June 2012 which was dismissed by this Honourable Court on the 9" January 2014 be restored pursuant to Rule 103 of the ” Supreme Court Rules 1982 (Public Notice No. 1 of 1983).
Lee ,
2. That the Honourable Court enlarges the time within which the ' Appellant/A pplicant is to file his case based on the grounds of appeal filed in the said Notice of Civil Appeal pursuant to Rule ‘, 41 (b) of the Supreme Court Rules 1982 (Public Notice No ] of
The application is supported by the of Mohamed Pa-Momo Fofanah sworn to on the 14" January 2014 and_ the exhibits filed herein. At the hearing A B Fofanah Esq. for the Plaintiff/Applicant relied on the contents of this affidavit dated 14” January 2014 and based his application under Rule 4(i) (b) of the Supreme Court Rules]
982. N. D. Tejan-Cole Esq for Respondent/Respondent opposed the application on the ground that the Plaintiff/Applicant did not show sufficient reason why the application should be granted in that the Plaintiff/Applicant did not have sufficient funds to file his case at the relevant time and that his affidavit was defective. Mohamed Pa-Momoh Fofanah Esq for the Plaintiff/Applicant replied that the Plaintiff/Applicant made full and frank disclosure of the facts and that the affidavit was not defective. In the Civ App 4/2002 between Ibrahim A. N. Basma Applicant and Adnan Yousef Wansa Respondent and Bassam Ibrahim Basma — Applicant and Adnan Yousessef Wanza Respondent the Hon Mr ‘ Justice M E Tolla Thompson said “Procedural rules are intended to . serve as hand maiden of justice and not to defeat it, and invoke the x
Zo3Z courts discretionary power to waive strict application of the rules, in order to ensure that the parties have a fair opportunity to argue their case in the Supreme Court.
, Having heard the arguments of both sides I grant the application under Rule 103 of the Supreme Court Rules 1982 in the interest of justice. In the circumstances | order that the Appellant/Applicant notice of appeal dated the 11 June 2012 which was dismissed be restored and I grant an enlargement of time within which to file ihorapbeal ts the Supreme Court which is seven days from today’s case. The Plaintiff/Applicant is to pay the Respondent/Respondent cost assessed at Le2,000,000.
HON MRS V.A.D. WRIGHT - JSC 1 AGREE Re HON MR JUSTICE P.O. HAMILTON- JSC
1 AGREE coc MD ee ALoccccster nee
‘ HON JUSTICE V. V. THOMAS - JSC
Citations and appeal history
Read from the judgments on Lanbuk: a link is shown only where a judgment's text carries the other's exact citation. The quotes are the court's own words, so you can see how the case was used.
No other judgment on Lanbuk is recorded as citing this one, and it cites none of them by citation. It may still be cited in judgments and reports that are not on Lanbuk.
Why is Victor Alphonso Deveneaux v John Kamara & Ors important?
Victor Alphonso Deveneaux v John Kamara & Ors is important for this principle: An appellant may apply to restore a dismissed appeal and for an enlargement of time to file their case pursuant to the Supreme Court Rules. The judgment is listed under Sierra Leone — Supreme Court on 10 June 2014.
How do I cite Victor Alphonso Deveneaux v John Kamara & Ors?
Cite Victor Alphonso Deveneaux v John Kamara & Ors as Victor Alphonso Deveneaux v John Kamara & Ors [2014] SLSC 10, which is its recorded neutral or law-report citation. The decision is from Sierra Leone — Supreme Court on 10 June 2014.
Cite this page
Victor Alphonso Deveneaux v John Kamara & Ors [2014] SLSC 10 (Lanbuk, 9 October 2026) <https://www.lanbuk.com/cases/victor-alphonso-deveneaux-v-john-kamara-ors-sc-civ-app-6-of-2012-173w8> accessed 9 November 2026
