
Insurance contracts
Doctrine in Insurance. 20 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Conteh v Northern Assur. Co. Ltd, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 260
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: An insurer is bound to indemnify a permitted driver for liability arising from death or bodily injury, but a third party has no direct statutory right of action against the insurer for property damage.
- Conteh v. Northern Assurance Company Limited (CC 314 of 1964) [1965] SLSC 1 (20 August 1965)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1965
Principle established: Third parties cannot directly recover against motor vehicle insurers under compulsory insurance statutes for property damage where the statute only mandates coverage for bodily injury or death.
- Grace Jenner-Wright v T. Yassin & 2 Others (CC 416 of 1960) [1963] SLSC 40 (16 September 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: An insurer must indemnify an insured where a driver was operating the vehicle with the owner's permission and for a permitted domestic purpose under the policy.
- Grace Jenner-Wright v T. Yassin & Others (CC 416 of 1960) [1963] SLSC 13 (16 September 1963)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1963
Principle established: An motor vehicle insurance policy covering domestic purposes indemnifies the owner when another person drives the vehicle with permission for such purposes.
- Greene v New India Assur. Co. Ltd, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 303
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: An insurer that conducts the legal defence of an insured without repudiating liability is estopped from subsequently denying its obligation to indemnify.
- Greene v New India Assurance Company Limited (CIV APP 15 of 1971) [1973] SLCA 5 (27 April 1973)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1973
Principle established: An insurer that assumes and conducts the defence of an insured without repudiating the claim is estopped from subsequently denying its liability to indemnify the insured.
- Ibrahim Jalloh v White Cross Insurance Company Ltd. (CC 444 of 1960) [1961] SLSC 26 (27 March 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: Parties who refer a dispute to an arbitrator are bound by the award on fact and law absent corruption or an error of law apparent on the face of the award.
- Intra Bank S.A. v Royal Exchange Assur. Co, 1970-71 ALR S.L. 20
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1970-71
Principle established: An insurance clause requiring all due and proper precaution for the safety of money in transit necessitates continuous minute-to-minute supervision, and transit ceases upon unauthorized deviation before delivery.
- Intra Bank Societe Anonyme v Royal Exchange Assurance Company (CIV APP 9 of 1969) [1970] SLCA 5 (29 January 1970)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1970
Principle established: A condition requiring due and proper precaution for money in transit demands continuous supervision of the security system, and transit terminates if the courier deviates prior to delivery.
- Libertas General Insurance Company Limited v Puffs (MSCA Miscellaneous Civil Application 62 of 2023) [2024] MWSC 9 (10 April 2024)
Malawi · 2024
Principle established: An application for stay of execution of a money judgment may be brought in the Supreme Court after being dismissed by the High Court.
- New India Assur. Co. Ltd v Zabian, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 180
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: An insurance agent's knowledge of material facts is imputed to the insurer, and an insurer's approval of an insured's bookkeeping system estops it from relying on policy conditions requiring specific accounting standards.
- Rokel Exchange Assurance Company Limited v Bazzy (CIV APP 20 of 1971) [1972] SLCA 1284 (19 May 1972)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1972
Principle established: Under section 9 of the Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Act, policy conditions excluding insurer liability—such as driving by an unlicensed driver—are void against third parties.
- Royal Exchange Assur. Co. Ltd v Bazzy, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 103
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: Under section 9 of the Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Act, policy conditions excluding insurer liability—such as driving by an unlicensed driver—are ineffective against injured third parties.
- Royal Exchange Assur. Co. Ltd v Bazzy, 1972-73 ALR S.L. 336
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1972-73
Principle established: An insurer is liable to satisfy a third party's judgment only where the terms of the policy defining permitted drivers are met; driving by an unlicensed driver excludes coverage.
- Royal Exchange Assur. Co. v Jenner-Wright, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 27
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: The policyholder bears the burden of proving that an insured motor vehicle was being used for a permitted purpose contemplated by the policy at the time of an accident.
- Royal Exchange Assurance Company Limited v Bazzy (CIV APP 1 of 1972) [1973] SLSC 8 (17 October 1973)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1973
Principle established: An insurer is not liable to satisfy a judgment against the insured where the driver was unlicensed and thus excluded under the policy's permitted driver condition.
- Sulaiman Sesay v Me White Cross Insurance Company v Baffi Mineral Mining Company Ltd. (CC 440 of 1960) [1961] SLSC 15 (26 January 1961)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1961
Principle established: A judgment creditor cannot proceed directly against an insurer unless the insured's underlying liability was one required by law to be covered by the policy.
- Taylor v White Cross Insur. Co. Ltd, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 363
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: The measure of damages under an insurance policy for a damaged but not destroyed building is the reasonable cost of repairs necessary to reinstate it to its prior condition.
- Taylor v. White Cross Insurance Company Limited (CC 300 of 1962) [1966] SLSC 8 (25 January 1966)
Sierra Leone — Supreme Court · 1966
Principle established: The proper measure of damages against an insurer for partial loss to a building is the cost of executing the repairs necessary to restore it to its prior condition.
- White Cross Insurance Co. Ltd. & Baffi Mineral Mining Company Ltd. v Sulaiman Sesay (SL-CA 2 of 1961) [1961] SLCA 1 (14 April 1961)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 1961
Principle established: An injured person cannot enforce a judgment directly against an insurer unless the insured's liability was statutorily mandated to be covered by the insurance policy.
