Rev. Daniel Ademu John NO v Abu Black Gugbu (SC MISC APP 4 of 2000) [2000] SLSC 14 (24 October 2000)
Rev. Daniel Ademu John NO v Abu Black Gugbu is a miscellaneous application from Sierra Leone on 24 October 2000. Cite it as [2000] SLSC 14. Search it by the party names, the citation [2000] SLSC 14, or Sierra Leone miscellaneous application.
October 24, 2000
IN THE SUPREME COURT
Rev. Daniel Ademu John NO
Appellant
v.
Abu Black Gugbu
Respondent
SC MISC APP 4 of 2000
[2000] SLSC 14
Proceeding. Miscellaneous application. Sierra Leone.
ms 152 » IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SIERRA LEONE TUESDAY 24TH OCTOBER, 2000 . CORAM: Hen, Mr, Justice D., 3, F. Luke - cd. Hon, Mr, Justice A, B, Timbe - J.S.C, Hon, Mr. Justice H.M. Jeke-Smart - JS.C, Hon, Mr, Justice S.C.B, Warne - J.S.Ce Hon. Mrs. Justice V.A.D, Wright Teas SC.MISC. APP. 4/2000 REV. DANIEL ADSMU JOHN - (ATTORNEY FOR REV, ARCHIBALD GBAMBALD JOHN) (SXECUIOR OF THE ESTATE OF REV, GUSTAVUS ADEKU JOHN) AND ABU BLACK GUGBU ALLIS FOFANAH - LaMIN DAINKSH Re. A. CAESAR ESQUIRE for the Applicant As F, SBRRY-KAMAL SSQUIRE for the Respondents Mr. R. A, Caesar,
This is an application by way of Misc.App. 4/2000 dated 16th June, 2000 in which the applicant is asking the.Court that the Ruling of this Honourable : Court delivered by three Justices on 22nd September, 1999 granting a of the judgment of the Court of Appealm dated 17th June 1993 be varied discharged or reversed by the full Court pursuant to section 126 (b) of the Constitution of Sierra Leone (Act No.6 of 1991) on the following
Grounds
(1) That the said Ruling if not varied discharged or reversed will defeat 4 the ends of Justice in that there is no appeal pending in the Supreme Court,
hb
(2) That the orders contained in the said Ruling have not been complied with the Respondents,
(3) That the said order presently eristing is a bar preventing the , Applicant from enforcing the Judgment of the Court of Appeal dated 17th June, 1993 in his favour, Applicant will rely on the of Rev. Daniel Adem John and Roland Ade Caesar both sworn to on the 16th June, 2000 together with the exhibits annexed thereto and filed herewith. The Exhibits are as follows: Brh, A is a photocopy of his Power of Attoney erecuted by Rev. Archibald Gbambala John, Sxhibit B is the , C - Judgment of the Court of Appeal, D - Notice of Appeal tor: the Supreme Court, 8 - Records of the Supreme Court dated 21st September, 1999 and B - Ruling dated 22nd September, 1999. The purpose of the Application is not to complain of an irregularity but because Section 126(b) of the Constitution is the only way we can come to this Court to vary reverse or discharge its order. Mr, Serry-Kamal does not really objects except that the affidavit of the deponent should not have been in his name, Court: Application granted, Order of 22nd September, 1999 is disctiarged, No order as to costs.
Lb! : ee Hon, Mr. Justice DEF. Luke. Chief Justice.
Judges
The judges named in this report. Each page lists their other judgments on Lanbuk.