
Corporate personality
Doctrine in Company & Commercial. 4 cases, with the principle each one established. By lanbuk.com.
- Basma v New India Assur. Co, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 198
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: Omitting the word 'Limited' in naming a corporate party on a writ is a mere misnomer curable by amendment, provided a reasonable recipient would know it was intended for itself.
- Femi Hebron v White Lion Company Ltd & 2 Others (CIV APP 50 of 2017) [2019] SLCA 28 (1 October 2019)
Sierra Leone — Court of Appeal · 2019
Principle established: The court considered whether a defendant was personally liable for a contract or if the transaction was entered into by a corporate entity, emphasizing the distinction between personal and corporate liability.
- Mobil Oil S.L. Ltd v Texaco Af. Ltd, 1964-66 ALR S.L. 133
Sierra Leone — African Law Reports · 1964-66
Principle established: The omission of the word 'Limited' from a company's name on a writ is a mere misnomer curable by amendment, provided a reasonable recipient would not be misled about who was intended.
- Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1896] UKHL 1 (16 November 1896)
United Kingdom · 1896
Principle established: A company is a separate legal entity from its shareholders, meaning they are not personally liable for the company's debts beyond their unpaid share capital.
