
Walsh v Lonsdale
1882 · 21 Ch D 9
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- An agreement for a seven-year lease of a mill provided for rent in advance on demand. No deed was ever executed. The tenant went in and paid rent. The landlord then demanded a year's rent in advance and, when it was not paid, levied distress.
- Issue
- Could the landlord rely on a term that existed only in the agreement, not in a deed?
- Held
- Yes. The Court of Appeal held that equity would decree of the agreement, and that the tenant held on the terms of the agreement, including rent in advance.
- Principle
- A specifically enforceable contract for a lease is treated, as between the parties, as if the lease had been granted. Equity regards as done that which ought to be done.
- Why it matters
- It is the foundation of the equitable lease. It does not bind a purchaser of the legal estate who takes without notice.
Words and Latin in this note
- Specific performance
- An order requiring a party to actually carry out what they promised in a contract, instead of only paying damages. Open the note.
Also on Lanbuk
- Walsh v Lonsdale in Lanbuk on the Law of Equity and Trusts
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
